Topic: How can ICOs come back in the game? - page 4. (Read 1653 times)
To be frankly speaking, ICO can never come up into the cryptocurrency games anymore, its simply out. I believe in future there would be more ways of funds raising systems. The ICO system fraudulent techniques applied makes it a while shit but still wondering while some project nowadays conducts their token sales via ICO and failed surely at end scamming noobs, I see Jo reason for comeback battle for ICO in the game ,they are gone for ever.
It's all up to the project to abide new regulations and structures when using ICO as the way to raise the fund for their project., right? Then regulations and structures will not have that much of the impact if project doing ICO only do it at the start to raise enough funds and never intend to realize their plan, snowballing till no interest in their project then making a new one.
I think the ICO project is difficult to come back again, especially when investors are disappointed with the many ICO project scams.
Even investors have started to switch to investing in IEO projects that have proven to be more profitable. We have to move on from
the ICO, because for me the ICO is already dead and it is no longer feasible to provide benefits. Imagine in 2019 I have read article
ICO projects in circulation 99% scams. That's a percentage that reflects that ICOs never come back in the game.
Even investors have started to switch to investing in IEO projects that have proven to be more profitable. We have to move on from
the ICO, because for me the ICO is already dead and it is no longer feasible to provide benefits. Imagine in 2019 I have read article
ICO projects in circulation 99% scams. That's a percentage that reflects that ICOs never come back in the game.
All they have to do is take back the long lost confidence of investors, they have to prove the projects they are developing really live up to their expectations, because if it's just a promise, then the ICO will get back to playing as before.
You're talking about the most risky step in this whole cryptocurrency field, ICO's are so dangerous these days because of the volatility and the misleading projects willing to scam or grab peoples funds and run away. Talking about the regulation of the ICOs, it's also containing a risk because even the bounty managers themselves can't protect the project or assume that it would be successful, if the project is going to be a scam since the first step they will be, no one can change that fact. I hereby admit that this field is one of the hardest fields ever and its regulation won't be easy. We hope to see more regulated ICOs but these are just wishes.
If I am an investor I would have to be good in the analysis if a project that I like to support and invest is holding their crowdfunding in ICO because it is prone to a lot of mistakes because it is badly exploited by scammers you are on your own to decide what to look for, compared when the project is going to do an IEO where all the weight of making criterias are in the hands of the exchange.
Perlin was judged as a bad project by everyone. But this did not stop him from growing x10 in a month)) 
If I am an investor I would have to be good in the analysis if a project that I like to support and invest is holding their crowdfunding in ICO because it is prone to a lot of mistakes because it is badly exploited by scammers you are on your own to decide what to look for, compared when the project is going to do an IEO where all the weight of making criterias are in the hands of the exchange.
I don't think they can come back to the game again as it were before because IEO is now leading and there have never been signs of it slowing down, let alone for ICO. IEO has really proved that ICO has many downsides which ends up only benefiting the team. On a more serious note, why thinking of ICO when before investing in a project, as an investor you can either decide to do so or not when looking at the exchange the IEO will take place on; yes because exchange plays a vital role in the growth of any project and IEO gives investors the power to make choices based on that.
But there are still few projects which are running their ICOs trying hard to raise their funds.
And I don't think they will be successful unless they are backed with bigwigs.
IEO is also showing its true colour, most of them are not really on track in terms of their developments.
We will be seeing more and more types of crowdsourcing but the bottomline is, if the project is not solid and sincere, they will just disappear without a trace.
I don't think they can come back to the game again as it were before because IEO is now leading and there have never been signs of it slowing down, let alone for ICO. IEO has really proved that ICO has many downsides which ends up only benefiting the team. On a more serious note, why thinking of ICO when before investing in a project, as an investor you can either decide to do so or not when looking at the exchange the IEO will take place on; yes because exchange plays a vital role in the growth of any project and IEO gives investors the power to make choices based on that.
With a lot of flaws like ICOs as it was back then 2017-2018, of course, it needs to have regulations and structures to allow it to have a chance to stood against IEOs. Some other way I can think of to help ICOs have more chances to fix its flaw and have a decent shot at IEOs is how projects need to be serious about their plan even after the ICO done.
I think there is still a chance for the ICO to be trusted again, because many DEFI projects are now holding ICOs or their pre-sales are very successful, maybe the ICO for the Defi project can still compete
This must not be a question as so many new icos have already succeeded with its own crowdsale. ICO will exist forever and I think that IEO and ICO will be running at the same time and people are feeling good again with the revival of ico. 
I think there is still a chance for the ICO to be trusted again, because many DEFI projects are now holding ICOs or their pre-sales are very successful, maybe the ICO for the Defi project can still compete
This must not be a question as so many new icos have already succeeded with its own crowdsale. ICO will exist forever and I think that IEO and ICO will be running at the same time and people are feeling good again with the revival of ico. hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The biggest problem for ICO is they need to make investors trusting it again. Regulations and structures might work but I don't think it is a game-changer for ICO compare to IEOs. Maybe if there are more successful ICO projects again, people would slowly trust it again.
In this situation, it will difficult to gain trust from the investor because the investor is already hurt by the scam ICO. The investor needs to recover from the last scam, and I think the investor needs time to get their money back from other ways. Meanwhile, the project needs to run still and show the progress to the public, so the public can know that the ICO project still runs and the ICO don't want to scam them. If the ICO can do that, I am sure that the investor will also see what the developer and the teams does, so the investor will think again about investing in their project.
ICO may never be like before many trusted it and invested. The way I am seeing ICO now is based on recommendation or instruction decides to buy but by bounty promotion or hyping by some paid groups it may really not be successful. Some projects did ICO lately and came out very successful but that doesn't mean others can if you don't play your card well by proving to everyone the genuineness.
Too many scammers create cryptocurrency companies to collect money from investors and then just run away with this money, and this is most likely the biggest problem why ICOs are not so popular anymore and in order to return the former glory of the ICO sphere, every cryptocurrency company that will conduct ICO must be checked for fraud and for various other verification procedures.
The biggest problem for ICO is they need to make investors trusting it again. Regulations and structures might work but I don't think it is a game-changer for ICO compare to IEOs. Maybe if there are more successful ICO projects again, people would slowly trust it again.
there is no right way or guarantee that investing in an ICO is safe or profitable. ICO's reputation at this time has been bad, there are many problems about ICO especially fraud which is getting rampant. I think there is no way to restore confidence in ICOs, unless the current ICO is like the ICO in 2017.
I think there is still a chance for the ICO to be trusted again, because many DEFI projects are now holding ICOs or their pre-sales are very successful, maybe the ICO for the Defi project can still compete
Well, if they have a good development team and a lot of great partners investing in their projects then I believe they will get a lot of investors in this market, and their ICO is sure. will be successful. I have seen a lot of Defi projects succeeding lately and hope it can help make the ICO come back 
I think there is still a chance for the ICO to be trusted again, because many DEFI projects are now holding ICOs or their pre-sales are very successful, maybe the ICO for the Defi project can still compete
The chance will always there and it should not be asked again as so many new icos have already proven it as they can reach their hardcap instantly. The investors are not so stupid as people think and investors have already learned from their past experience about how to avoid the scam project.
I think there is still a chance for the ICO to be trusted again, because many DEFI projects are now holding ICOs or their pre-sales are very successful, maybe the ICO for the Defi project can still compete
Jump to: