Topic: how do you think about the forkdelta?? - page 2. (Read 521 times)
We really need a variety in exchangers and exchanges, because only then will we avoid such overloads, which recently arose on EtherDelta. I have not yet used ForkDelta, but I will definitely come and see. It is very good that in us the number of such exchanges is growing, where it is possible to exchange ERC20 tokens.
Very good alternative to Etherdelta, I think
I like fork delta. I would suggest to always use another layer of security like Metamask when you trade there. So far, transactions have been smooth.
yes this is a substitute for etherdelta, and I've several times transacted in forkdelta and have no problem for deposit or withdraw
I also know it in the past week, I think it works better than etherdelta but not much known. In the future I think it will be used more.
I learned about it not so long ago and was pleasantly surprised by the speed of interaction with the interface, in contrast to the EtherDelta. So now i'm fan of this fork 
that means of the new forkdelta was having some improvements compared with etherdelta. But this time i labelled all of those etherdelta developers just like scammers. They were raising a lot of funds through ico and then they are gone. That means like some people above me said they are selling nothing for something just like etherdelta worthless token. I hope this fork will never try to do that.
I think both forkdelta can be faster and more accurate than etherdelta. But better and safely install metamask in the browser. During the week I used forkdelta to exchange tokens instead of using etherdelta
is this a substitute for the exchange of etherdelta? how do you think is it safe for a better exchange ??
I've actually never hear of it. I'm still waiting on ehterdelta to resume it's service. Right now there are no updates on their twitter page, so I don't know what's going on. They said they were working on API issues, but the last update stating that was on the 15th Feb. The only "substitute for ehterdelta that I'm aware of, but never tried it, is the IDEX exchange. Are they even connected? Checked their twitter but didn't saw any mention of that.
Etherdelta is finished, the new owners held an ICO just for the money, now people are bag holding their wortthleess ED tokens.
Well I never held any etherdelta tokens, but I did used the exchange and I never held any problems with it. I just still don't understand if they will ever solve their API issues and come back, or if they will actually close business. As far as I know no one was harm by them, or lost any money, so if they will actually close, at least they didn't scam anyone which is good.
As for the forkdelta I still don't know if they are related, but I guess they aren't. I will probably given them a try, because I have some tokens I want to sell. I was waiting for etherdelta to comeback, but they are taking to long.
I learned about it not so long ago and was pleasantly surprised by the speed of interaction with the interface, in contrast to the EtherDelta. So now i'm fan of this fork
I only know this news when reading the comments here. I will try to use it to see if it is really good or not.
I personally observed that the interface of Forkdelta and that of EtherDelta decentralized exchanges look the almost same. In terms of loading speed they are almost the same. Maybe there are some few differences that I have not taken time to observed. There is another one that look like them that has a better loading speed, but it has not started trading. The name of the exchange is https://Etherflyer.com
it looks like forkdelta is a new exchange huh? or whether I'm new to it.
I've done transactions in forkdelta a few days ago, and my transaction went smoothly, but I see forkdelta very similar to etherdelta.
I've done transactions in forkdelta a few days ago, and my transaction went smoothly, but I see forkdelta very similar to etherdelta.
is this a substitute for the exchange of etherdelta? how do you think is it safe for a better exchange ??
Well, the way I see it, the forkdelta is clearly something that is better than etherdelta. I think that they are doing this to gain back trust from all the users out there that have lost interest in their services due to countless issues that have been sorrounding etherdelta. But even so, I sure hope that fork delta will be more better than etherdelta because it is the very first exchange I used and pretty much liked it before all the issues about it came up. Maybe when I see good feedbacks on their services, I would try using the forkdelta. But for now, I do not plan on supporting it yet.
It's safe as etherdelta, because forkdelta has the same database with etherdelta. I use forkdelta during week and everything is ok. But better use connection with Metamask
I do not understand about using connection with Metamask please explain to me?Here is a video that give you a pretty good overview of how to use metamask. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YeyTF5lalE
is this a substitute for the exchange of etherdelta? how do you think is it safe for a better exchange ??
It's safe because it interacts with the same smart contract as etherdelta while it's still responsive and not lagging like etherdelta. It also adjust the default gas price so the transaction won't stuck for too long, however if you feel like the gas price is too expensive then you can change it as you like. I don't use etherdelta anymore since i know about forkdelta. 
is this a substitute for the exchange of etherdelta? how do you think is it safe for a better exchange ??
I completely moved over forkdelta during past week and it's fine. They are sharing the same smart contract, but forkdelta is showing correct orders. Etherdelta is still a mess.
Highly recommended to use both with metamask instead of private key.
Fork delta is better in terms of UI design and flexibility, but this is the same shitty and low trust exchange, where all of your money could be stolen if you don't use Metamask
Fordelta and Etherdelta has sharing the same database,the same smartcontracts and both of these websites are being run by the same people.So there will be no different which one you would use,Forkdelta has some advantages because there are less people who are using the exchange which means there will be less traffics and problems,unlike to ED which has slowed and has a lof of problems.
I got confused here... if Etherdelta is the same with forkdelta, then why built new platform? Is there a good reason for this?
About less user on forkdelta make the transaction smoother, how about when the user of ED migrates to FD?
I did not touch EtherDelta after the hack anymore, the new owners don't give me any any hope for improvement either, most likely they tried to fill their pockets themselves. It all became more clear when they tried to raise more money with their shady ICO. If I had to use it again then I would prefer to use ForkDelta as this one has nothing to do with the new owners. Still Idex is a better choice nowadays.
i think it's safe like etherdelta and i think also it's a development version from it and have the same database .. so we need to know if the two exchange will stay or only on of it ?
Jump to: