They can also get more deposits from users if they are very transparent and don't always find a way to hold onto player's money whenever they win a large amount with KYC and later change their mind that the players must comply and do verification even though they said it wasn't necessary at first and even after doing the verification, they should adhere to fair policy and allow users to withdraw their money, which will instil some level of confidence in the player. That money they withdraw will either directly or indirectly return to the casino, it could be they are putting the integrity of the firm they played and won with to the test.
It is always normal for gambling casinos they are always given a KYC for only people who won a large amount, and some of them allow a large withdrawal with this like just need to submit first a KYC, or else they will hold your winning sometimes they are allowing withdrawal but in a certain amount only like 20% of the total balance and it took always a months before you can allow makes another withdrawal.
In my opinion, such an online casino policy is not very fair to the casino user.
Why introduce the KYC procedure when withdrawing funds from the gaming platform?
Why is the obligation to complete the KYC procedure correlated with the size of the player's winnings?
What difference does it make if the player wins a large sum of money or not?
After all, in any case, the money won in the online casino is the lucky player's own money. And he can dispose of them without any restrictions.
I see in such a policy of the administration of the online casino a restriction of the player's natural rights to dispose of his own funds. To some extent, this is a violation (illegal restriction) of property rights. At the same time, the right to property is one of the basic rights of a free person.