I have never heard of all these cryptocurrencies you have mentioned here, and it seems like they are all worthless, I can't even find any of them online (though I didn't search for all, but the ones I searched for never appeared).
Even If I did find any, I don't think I will ever be interested in investing in any of the coins that are listed. Just look at their names, anyone who is serious wouldn't be using dumb names like these, they all have dumb names, like what the hell is Bitcoin Boy and Pizza? Lol, these people are not serious. I guess this is part of the reasons why they failed, because they had no single vision, so they never knew what they were doing.
Many of the Bitcoin forks that have come and gone, served as quick money grabs by developers. With silly names like Bitcoin God, Super Bitcoin, and Bitcoin Pizza, no one will take them seriously. Anyone can copy Bitcoin's source code to make a new coin, but what matters is constant development, innovation, and most of all, real use cases for the mainstream world. Most people are tired of hype and false promises provided by developers working on cloned Bitcoin projects. A cryptocurrency which is nearly identical to the original one, will not gather the attention of everyday people.
I'm surprised to see Bitcoin-based forks like Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV still alive after a couple of years since inception. Maybe it's because they're being maintained by developers? If I were to compare both BCH and BSV, I'd say that BCH is the winner since it's constantly being developed with a great number of people supporting it. Some say that BSV is only backed and supported by Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre, bringing concerns over the project's level of centralization. But who cares? As long as the original Bitcoin (BTC) is still alive and running, there should be nothing to worry about. Alternative versions of Bitcoin will most likely fail in the long run due to their inability to provide use cases for the mainstream world. Not to mention, their focus is on convenience/ease of use rather than the security/reliability of the underlying Blockchain network.
In the end, the market will decide which coins will survive and which will die in the long run. I believe that the more Bitcoin forks there are, the better it'll be for the Blockchain ecosystem. Like it or not, this greatly contributes towards the development of Blockchain technology. Issues/flaws that are discovered on one chain, can be prevented on other chains. It's like a "ripple effect" if you ask me. No matter how many forks there are, there will always be one true Bitcoin whose path will be decided by people using/supporting it. Just my thoughts