but gold has intrinsic value. people actually need it to work, to some industries, jewelry, etc. Gold will always have value.
bitcoin dont.
don't get me wrong, im not against bitcoin (actually i love it), i just love to see every aspects and possibilities and sometime play the devel's advocate to really understand where this is capable to go.
And don't follow than genius blindly because you have even more genius on the other side, the side that says bitcoin is a mirage!
I understand you like bitcoin; that's why you're here. But your arguments are simply wrong. What intrinsic value does gold have? Absolutely nothing. I always laugh when I hear people say that gold has intrinsic value. If you're stuck on a deserted island, what can gold do for you? Nothing. You can make jewelry with gold, but you can make jewelry with a lot of things. Plus you can melt the gold back down, and make something else; it isn't completely consumed. Gold doesn't have any "real" use. Even silver has more intrinsic value, because it is used in a lot of industries.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, DOES HAVE INTRINSIC VALUE. I'm not talking about the "backed by mathematics" bullshit. I'm talking about the blockchain's potential use as a secure, public database. Look at how much money companies like oracle are making now. Larry Ellison is one of the richest people on Earth. Bitcoin could potentially provide a better, more secure database system than anything oracle can ever make. There are also uses for bitcoin's blockchain in terms of smart contracts and such.
There are REAL WORLD USES for bitcoin/blockchain, that's why there are VCs willing to invest in the space. Bitcoin is like the "fuel" of the bitcoin blockchain, and it is required to keep the blockchain secure. That's it's intrinsic value. If people want to use the blockchain, they will have to pay with bitcoins.