Topic: How much longer will JollyGood take to reverse his feedback? - page 2. (Read 1153 times)

If someone does claim this as the case, then clearly the neutral tag should not be removed.

In fact, such a case would demand the neutral tag's elevation to a higher status of negative feedback, in my opinion.

And what about the Zilon account? You mentioned that you brought him to the forum, right? It is interesting that at that time, you (dbc23) were inactive on the forum for more than two years. Can you tell us more about that?

Speaking of cans of worms, here is another case where a member is asking for (or insisting on) having neutral feedback removed as though it somehow becomes compulsory for one to remove or revise it as per to the liking of the one receiving it.

Question (and thread title):
"How much longer will JollyGood take to reverse his feedback?"

Answer:
"I will not remove it" (if that is what the OP means by reverse)

-----------------

I have no idea why anybody would go to such lengths and such theatrics for the sake of trying to have a neutral tag removed unless it is connected in some way shape or form to earning from bounties, avatars or signature campaigns and on too many occasions related to account farming and to puppeteers that are controlling several accounts.

Even those proclaiming their reputation is under scrutiny because of a single neutral tag from me and if they insist they are not a low level poster (which over a period of time they might be able to prove with good quality posts), eventually somehow find themselves and their reputations connected to earning via the forum which is what it ultimately comes down to. Some go around chasing for a neutral tag to be removed and others try their best for a negative tag to be removed.

In this case, the farming will probably exceed the three names mentioned but we will wait to see what transpires in a short period ahead:

~dbc23
~coco23
~Zilon

I wish coco23 will say something about this and why he choose to post the same BTC address I can't be defending something I know nothing about. I haven't sent a pm to such user neither have we exchanged anything before now. coco23 needs to come up to say why he chose to use my BTC address instead of his. If it will be possible we post our different locations on a particular day and time simultaneously or any other means that can prove it was a mistake on coco23 part.

It would seem OP’s decision to create this thread has opened a can of worms, I’m sure he will be regretting his decision now. He could have sent a pm to Jollygood and avoid such open confrontation, I guess he thought if his case was supported by other members, JG would reconsider his feedback. I think you’re lucky no one has tagged you yet, even if it’s true that the other account is your brother or friend, most people wouldn’t believe you because that excuse has already been used up.

I have removed and revised feedback on numerous occasions. I am not as strict or as stubborn as some might make me out to be 

On several occasions I gave completely incorrect feedback and removed/revised it. On some occasions I revised the feedback after the member posted and contributed positively regularly over a period of time.

The issue that brought about the neutral tag for dbc23 was an error on his part but it was sufficient enough for me to understand what he was up to. If he did it another thread I did not frequent it could have gone unnoticed but he did it in one of my self-moderated threads therefore I spotted it.

Yes I have, I am quick to revise or remove tags when I realise I made a mistake, I am human after all therefore am prone to errors even when I try my best   

If he were to put effort in when posting the OP would not have had anything to worry about now some of his farming accounts have been connected he and the associated accounts will probably have problems enrolling now.

Honestly speaking, I could not care less about the score, it was simply the fact that an event already happened and the outcome was already know yet the OP still wrote nonsense which clearly showed he posted to increase his posts.

He posted in one of my self-moderated threads that was why I noticed his post.

Well bro I'm not sure I would call it "absurd." You literally posted the same BTC address in posts that appear to be about half an hour apart. Why would we bother checking out the contents of posts when there's direct blockchain links tying you to other accounts? Those are generally regarded as more firm of a connection.


If you notice, nobody has actually red tagged you yet, but you know, do what you gotta do.

No, it is not. What do you have to say about sharing addresses with the other accounts?

I have the right to express myself in which ever idiomatic and grammatical words I feel will express how I feel about a post. What is the essence of posting when I make the reader do extra research to comprehend my posts. I chose to lighten my choice of words to so I don't bug the reader with so much stress not everyone has that time to start debugging words.

Just like the word logarithmyically which was a way to say how many times Bitcoin went up in 2017, a comparison to how post quality dropped that year. Now comparing the quality of posts to previous years I saw that many posters decided to adopt google translators to make statements and the whole idea of getting unique knowledge died rather google boiler plate statement became rampant, more or less twisting contents from google and replicating them on the forum to earn merits. The sole reason I took a break at some point.

As for linking my account to coco23 is absurd, I mean we don't even post in the same way and manner same thing goes to Zilon who I will boldly say I brought into the forum. Instead of linking transactions and addresses we have used in the past check out the contents of both posters and draw your conclusions based on that...

I will leave the forum to make their final decision on this matter. I am tired of seeing users link accounts of users that are in no way related but do what is right and make sure you have enough evidence before mitting out your judgements.

My account is clean of all accusations. I can as well decide to transact with anybody on the forum any day any time and thereby moving funds across wallets

Yeah, way to many coincidences for them not to be related in some way.


Probably will tag them sooner or later, but lets see if any of them come back to try explain it away. Once again, probably will not work but stranger things have happened...just can't think of any at the moment.

And yet again, had they just ignored the 1 negative nobody would have cared. And since JG is quick to pull the trigger (nothing wrong with that) but it was still a minor thing a lot of campaign managers would have excused it for acceptance so long as everything else with the account was good.

-Dave

Three or four Signature campaigns have just opened up spaces, so dbc23 was probably angling to join one of them this week to either clear their debts, or just double dip payments from campaign managers.

How many coincidences today.

Now this is interesting:


Note the time Zilon posted their request for an extension...

49 minutes after the OP started this thread...

Later on I'll come back and take a good look at the thread and links to decide if I take an aggressive approach on this issue. But if I understand it correctly, we have pretty clear indications that the OP has not only bought the account, but has other accounts that have been red trusted previously, or have committed plagiarism, no?

6/28/2021 12:23:43 AM    woke up -     dbc23
6/30/2021 2:16:39 PM    password changed -   Zilon

Source bpip.org

---

---

This is true - Zilon is in the Rollbit signature campaign which @Hhampuz is the campaign manager of.

https://loyce.club/trust/2023-05-13_Sat_05.07h/2862749.html


Sucking up to all the campaign managers perhaps??

Why is Jollygood being talked about as some kind of machine, bot?  I am still convinced that behind that account is a real person with some beliefs of his own.


OP, I believe you have already been told many times, a neutral tag is not that influential for your participation in the forum. That's why this drama that you started for the second time is a bit unclear to me.
Also, you obviously don't understand the use of the trust system, you left a negative tag on Timelord2067 as a form of revenge, because of his feedback on your trust page.

However, what presented nutildah and lovesmayfamilis, say that Jollygood's neutral feedback will be the least of your problems here.

Yeh - speaking of abusing the Trust system:



I'll leave it for @JollyGood to slap the first negative on your BOUGHT account.

Thanks, nutildah . I lost where and when I wrote about this user. But he knew for sure that something was wrong with him.
In addition, about the conversation that this account may also belong to the Zilon account. In addition to the previously found matches for the Bitcoin address, you can also see the total transactions with the BSC wallet.




https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=0xf1e6c4972335Ad5e28187a3e6247cC18a085bB93


Therefore, to say that the dbc23 account is clean as water would be stupid, OP.

This is the situation when someone complains about having negative or neutral feedback, and then something much worse happens to them - someone finds proof that the account was bought or that it is part of an alt farm in which at least one account has been permanently banned. Now, instead of that irrelevant tag, the OP has much more to worry about, especially if someone digs up hard evidence and paints him in red.

Its tacky for Timelord to leave a link to his own question as the reference in your neutral feedback (in lieu of proof or even evidence), but it means even less than Jollygood's feedback. You leaving him a negative in response is not the right way to go about handling it.

I can see you're upset but the thing is you probably did buy this account, or acquire it in some other way, because the person who owned it before you had a completely different style of writing, and they were writing because they enjoyed posting, not because they were merely slogging through the requirements of their sig campaign.

So you're gonna tell us you posted this?


Cmon bro, that's not you.

What's worse is you appear to have a bunch of accounts on this forum, and one of them is even in DT2:



The address of coco23 shows up first because you only wrote "R" for reserve, meaning he didn't copy the address from you. And that account only used it once whereas yours used it a bunch of times.

I'm not tagging you but I am excluding you and coco23.