A bounty should be straightforward and direct; no hiccups
With no terms such as; you can be deleted without any explanation
Or terms like; payment allocation can be adjusted
Fair and honest is all that is required
Topic: HOW SHOULD A BOUNTY BE........ (Read 566 times)
You have a point But Sometime Its not only Bounty Hunter who dump the token investor are part of it . Most Project give out 50% bonus in Pre-sale lets say you have bought $1000 wealth of token and your giving 50% bonus .. as soon the token get on exchange if you are panic investor you will dump it and go .. Some time Bounty Hunter cheat but KYC can never solve the issue .. sometime the project manager should distribute the bounty hunter token on 2 or 3 quarter bases ..i think it can help .
I agree that everyone is difficult to deal with the division of the money, but do you understand the feeling that our money is held by others, I am very inhibited about that feeling. But I also agree that dividing each installment to pay is the most stable
You are correct. But a lot of ICOs and bounties being total scam, it would be too risky to provide you KYC to anyone and everyone.
If requested for, KYC should be verified by a trusted third party agent rather than being asked by campaign managers and ICO teams.
Until now, there are many KYC issues that have problems regarding KYC which is required for bounty hunters. even though I think so far there is no problem with the bounty hunter in completing KYC several project bounties that have been followed. I myself do KYC for bounty if the project is good and really pays. If requested for, KYC should be verified by a trusted third party agent rather than being asked by campaign managers and ICO teams.
You are correct. But a lot of ICOs and bounties being total scam, it would be too risky to provide you KYC to anyone and everyone.
If requested for, KYC should be verified by a trusted third party agent rather than being asked by campaign managers and ICO teams.
If requested for, KYC should be verified by a trusted third party agent rather than being asked by campaign managers and ICO teams.
I think most of the people and also the ICO believe that bounty is main reason for the dump of the coin. It is true in either way but most of the participants are scammers. They make multiple accounts acquire most of the reward and when the coin is listed on exchange they dump it. Most of the content have only views (PAID) and no public interaction but then also then they are getting huge rewards and aquire the reward of true bounty hunter.
FOR ME THE ICO SHOULD HAVE THESE CONDITION :
1) KYC
2) content should be checked nicely.
3) Facebook and Twitter accounts should be checked if they have real people or not.
These things will reward only the one who should get rewarded. I think fraud will be very less by applying these things.
THOUGHT - Only scammer and fraud people dump their coins but True bounty hunters support the project by HODLING as they know how much it takes to give a good content.
honestly I really hate KYC and also the data that I have is not cheap and it's impossible I want to exchange my data with a few $.FOR ME THE ICO SHOULD HAVE THESE CONDITION :
1) KYC
2) content should be checked nicely.
3) Facebook and Twitter accounts should be checked if they have real people or not.
These things will reward only the one who should get rewarded. I think fraud will be very less by applying these things.
THOUGHT - Only scammer and fraud people dump their coins but True bounty hunters support the project by HODLING as they know how much it takes to give a good content.
I don't think it is possible for a bounty manager to check on each social media account of a bounty participant. it's a stupid thing that wastes a lot of time.
Now bounty is going down. But coming future bounty will be increase am steel believe. Some bounty need to kyc. So before join the bounty check the rules and regulations. Then easy to choose and invest. If price is down wait and check the price then exchange and sell it.
Check the below mentioned link. It help to get some information and ideas.
https://ih.advfn.com/cryptocurrency/icolist
Check the below mentioned link. It help to get some information and ideas.
https://ih.advfn.com/cryptocurrency/icolist
here are my opinions :
I don't agree that only scammers are dumping their coins. Anyone have right to buy or sell any of their asset, it's their rights. They have been paid for doing their jobs, and not scamming anyone.
- KYC proccess is to prevent money laundering, therefore it's not really necessary for bounty hunters, unless they will buying tokens at tokensale.
- I agree that content campaign should be checked carefully or give a hard rules, but the amount of tokens they received is related to the portion of total stake of the campaigns. If someone has a minimum stake but no one is accepted on the campaigns then he/she deserves to get 100% of campaign allocation.
- There's a website which can automatically check real followers, it's not about real or fake but the most important is that their follower is related to crypto or not
I don't agree that only scammers are dumping their coins. Anyone have right to buy or sell any of their asset, it's their rights. They have been paid for doing their jobs, and not scamming anyone.
I don't think bounty hunters are the only dumpers. Most of the bounty hunters hold their coin for the future to get a passive amount. However, the traditional way of bounty isn't profitable for the project because they engagement is too low.
We are almost at the end stage of bounty campaigns and I doubt there might be any bounty participants if all the bounty projects either turns out to be a scam or don't pay thier dues to bounty hunter and there needs to be a much organized way that the bounty programs should operate. While most of the bounty users just dump their coin once they receive it but there are some of them who holds it.
I disagree if you call the bounty hunter a dump ... I also know why you consider the bounty hunter to cause dum ... that's because you have never invested ico ... if you have invested a large amount of ico then you will know who cause a dump .. '
Remember, bounty allocation is only 1-2%, while you don't count bonuses for investors?
You are right, bounty hunters only have a small amount of funds from ICO allocations. Investors are the ones who influence the destruction of the price of an altcoin because they hold a lot of coins from the ICO.Remember, bounty allocation is only 1-2%, while you don't count bonuses for investors?
I don't think KYC is necessary unless it's a legal requirement of whatever jurisdiction the bounty is being run in.
FOR ME THE ICO SHOULD HAVE THESE CONDITION :
1) KYC
2) content should be checked nicely.
3) Facebook and Twitter accounts should be checked if they have real people or not.
Number 1 is a no for me. I will not give my personal information to some stupid scammers out there whom I don't know. They can do anything in my information like selling it online etc.1) KYC
2) content should be checked nicely.
3) Facebook and Twitter accounts should be checked if they have real people or not.
Contents and social media campaign checking are done by the bounty manager so this is the fault of the bounty manager. Sad to say, there are some lazy bounty managers out there who aren't checking if the accounts are real or not as long as they are being paid.
I don't think bounty hunters are the only dumpers. Most of the bounty hunters hold their coin for the future to get a passive amount. However, the traditional way of bounty isn't profitable for the project because they engagement is too low.
Well, in the project in which I participate, I saw that social networks are checking for reality. Maybe it's time for all other projects to enter this procedure. I can also say that the content should check more. So many scammers just steal articles.
I do not think KYC is needed for a bounty, but if the needs arises then it can be done. But I think it should be the last resort.
First we must know why we are making a bounty campaign, this is to advertise the project. Unless multiple account is not permitted on the bounty, I do not see any wrong if someone exploit this hole on the campaign. Beside those alt account will be doing the advertising too. Morally I believe it is wrong but technically it isn't. Aside from that, the reward of the bounty hunters must be filtered by the manager in-charge. And the manager must be strict in implementing rules. If the participant does not meet the requirements, he can always reject the application and all the entries.
First we must know why we are making a bounty campaign, this is to advertise the project. Unless multiple account is not permitted on the bounty, I do not see any wrong if someone exploit this hole on the campaign. Beside those alt account will be doing the advertising too. Morally I believe it is wrong but technically it isn't. Aside from that, the reward of the bounty hunters must be filtered by the manager in-charge. And the manager must be strict in implementing rules. If the participant does not meet the requirements, he can always reject the application and all the entries.
Your better off if the service pays in a trustworthy crypto like bitcoin and ethereum. Accepting new coins/tokens as payment is extremely risk and you will be unlikely to cash it out due to low liquidity. Remember that it takes very little effort to create a new token.
creating token now very easy to do now since many platform that allowed it.even there are many people open services for this.and if we don't know the developers background we could trapped in wrong projects that will not give us worthed reward. 
Your better off if the service pays in a trustworthy crypto like bitcoin and ethereum. Accepting new coins/tokens as payment is extremely risk and you will be unlikely to cash it out due to low liquidity. Remember that it takes very little effort to create a new token.
it is the job of bounty manager to find and get rid of scammers, spammers, and lastly those people who have multiple accounts, i don't understand why would you need KYC for bounty campaign, the bounty manager should declare that there will be KYC at the start of the campaign, most of bounty campaign tells it at the end of campaign, it's like scamming the bounty hunters, to solve the trust issue we need a escrow to hold the bounty tokens for us.
Sometimes bounty manager is also used with tricky ways and they don't understand what is going on. ICOs can successfully reach the soft cap and get listed by the exchanges. The later team decides to stop the development of the project and they gave back the invested amounts. 
I personally think that the Bounties should be paid half in the token and half in ETH OR BTC on a weekly basis, that way people don't get discouraged by waiting months and months to receive a useless token that in the end isn't worth anything, or be totally scammed by the ICOS that run off with Investor's money. Both TOKENS AND ETH/BTC should be escrowed as well that way there is more trust being built by both parties. Also, there should be minimum level at least KYC, like for example, you must put in the PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION post. Like recently there was a gang of Vietnamese Thieves, stealing all my Husband's videos and my blog reviews, pretending to be us, they even made telegram i.d using our photos, etc. So there has to be trust built from both sides of the fence.
I think most of the people and also the ICO believe that bounty is main reason for the dump of the coin. It is true in either way but most of the participants are scammers. They make multiple accounts acquire most of the reward and when the coin is listed on exchange they dump it. Most of the content have only views (PAID) and no public interaction but then also then they are getting huge rewards and aquire the reward of true bounty hunter.
FOR ME THE ICO SHOULD HAVE THESE CONDITION :
1) KYC
2) content should be checked nicely.
3) Facebook and Twitter accounts should be checked if they have real people or not.
These things will reward only the one who should get rewarded. I think fraud will be very less by applying these things.
THOUGHT - Only scammer and fraud people dump their coins but True bounty hunters support the project by HODLING as they know how much it takes to give a good content.
That might be the best arrangement for the ICO organizers, but not for bounty hunters, maybe you have read various reasons from the other members above, especially for KYC. The bounty hunter does not want to sell his personal data to the ICO organizers, because of their privacy. The crypto world is created to maintain the privacy of each user, if there is a KYC system, there is no privacy again. Except for registration on exchanges, which has been running for a long time and many people know this exchange (big exchanges), maybe that is necessary FOR ME THE ICO SHOULD HAVE THESE CONDITION :
1) KYC
2) content should be checked nicely.
3) Facebook and Twitter accounts should be checked if they have real people or not.
These things will reward only the one who should get rewarded. I think fraud will be very less by applying these things.
THOUGHT - Only scammer and fraud people dump their coins but True bounty hunters support the project by HODLING as they know how much it takes to give a good content.
Not all bounties will implement KYC as we now it, even the developers will be the ones to decide that and the rest is bounty managers job, the bounty I'm presently promoting has a very hardworking no nonsense bounty manager, and many who used double accounts are been fished out already and mind you this doesn't stop dumpers from dumping
Jump to: