Topic: How to choose a good ICO, what criteria? (Read 859 times)
Wow, this awesome, infact u have just helped anyone that wanna invest in ICO. Because nowadays investing in ICO looks somehow risked, but reading this should help anyone interested in ICO. Bravo
nothing perfect. sometime the project good at some, and the other they have average. they have big reward but low price at the end, or low reward but high price. nothing sure.
maybe someone choose their project from who manager that handle it. good manager will research it project
maybe someone choose their project from who manager that handle it. good manager will research it project
It seems ICOs has been relegated to the past even though a project called Ferrum has decided to forego the IEO method and go old school.. my main criteria for evaluating a good ICO is it's team and whitepaper especially the team's activities.
Wow this is really a great information, to be very much honest.
I literally loved it.
It will be really helpful for a newbie , so that he will not end in losses.
Lastly, i would advise all the newbies to use their brain and keep themselves aware of the situations.
Never fall into scam ICOs.
I literally loved it.
It will be really helpful for a newbie , so that he will not end in losses.
Lastly, i would advise all the newbies to use their brain and keep themselves aware of the situations.
Never fall into scam ICOs.
A lot of good things to check on by the OP but may be too much to think about. There are also other important aspects that you need to consider like what those projects are aiming for. I fully support blockchain technology and believe how it can be used across all industries, and that's why I fully support legitimate blockchain companies which improve scalability, security, and blockchain functionality.
You need to check a lot of factors to make choices. No ICO is really good, but if it meets your criteria then choose and join it. Currently I only monitor IEO projects on Binance exchange. Because I believe Binance chooses ICO very well and is well worth the investment
Thanks for the detailed list. Everyone says "due diligence" but no one says what that means.
Nice one, if I must participate in an ICO then the major factor I would consider is the team, I must try to know the team backing the project ,also I go through the white paper to help me understand what the use case is.
Team and concept. this is important because we see the potential of whether it is good or not. many of the concepts offered in cryptocurrency aand as an investor analyzing are also important things to be able to benefit.
Steps to evaluate a good ICO:
1 Overall rating (overview)
2 main page
3 Power Forum (Forum)
4 Transaction Graph (Chart)
5 Trading volume (volume) 24h
6 Scale of investment capital (Market Cap)
7 Price rate
8 Papers proving ... (POS, POW, DPOS)
9 Current Supply (Current Offer)
10 Total supply (Total supply)
11 time a block (s)
12 Master / Supper / Full buttons
13 Mining / Ritual / Havest / Reward
Section / block
15 Budget for finance
16 development teams (development team)
The Elements
18 smart contracts
19 Reward mechanism (Reward)
MultiSig
21 Transaction Fee (Fee)
22 Block size (Blocksize);
23 Purse Purse (wallet)
24 Send Message (Private Message)
25 Inflation (Inflation)
26 Compare crypto with industry
27 WhitePaper
28 Path clearly visible
29 live support (slack, tele)
30 Youtube channels
Social Network (FB, steemit)
32 Twitter channels
33 Blockchain Explorer
34 fully hidden
35 new blockchain / new technology
36 Testnet
37 payment utilities
38 Practical applications
39 Example Name (Alias)
And through the 39 criteria above, I choose AION, ICON, NEO, WANCHAIN, BITDGREE, CURRENT !!
1 Overall rating (overview)
2 main page
3 Power Forum (Forum)
4 Transaction Graph (Chart)
5 Trading volume (volume) 24h
6 Scale of investment capital (Market Cap)
7 Price rate
8 Papers proving ... (POS, POW, DPOS)
9 Current Supply (Current Offer)
10 Total supply (Total supply)
11 time a block (s)
12 Master / Supper / Full buttons
13 Mining / Ritual / Havest / Reward
Section / block
15 Budget for finance
16 development teams (development team)
The Elements
18 smart contracts
19 Reward mechanism (Reward)
MultiSig
21 Transaction Fee (Fee)
22 Block size (Blocksize);
23 Purse Purse (wallet)
24 Send Message (Private Message)
25 Inflation (Inflation)
26 Compare crypto with industry
27 WhitePaper
28 Path clearly visible
29 live support (slack, tele)
30 Youtube channels
Social Network (FB, steemit)
32 Twitter channels
33 Blockchain Explorer
34 fully hidden
35 new blockchain / new technology
36 Testnet
37 payment utilities
38 Practical applications
39 Example Name (Alias)
And through the 39 criteria above, I choose AION, ICON, NEO, WANCHAIN, BITDGREE, CURRENT !!
This is great! I think this is the deepest research someone can make about specific project. More things you check from this list more safer you can be with your
investment. I check most of them, but I don`t have time to check everything. It would be exhausting, I have other things to do. That`s why I follow some people
who make great reviews about existing and new projects, people who have time and more knowledge about technology.
You listed many criteria that we should check, but I`m sure that list can be longer. Checking team members, their CV`s, previous accomplishments, checking WP can
be difficult without proper knowledge.
I will check AION, WANCHAIN, BITDGREE. ICON and NEO are already on my list. Thanks for good suggestions.
So many points:) In fact, this seems to be a great way. The more detailed the analysis, the less chances of f*ckup. Last ptoject I invested in and meets my needs for the most part is taklimakan network.
I do not see anything positive why you should now invest into ICOs.
Big sales are on cryptocurrencies, on cryptocurrencies that are really working, solving a real problem, so why you want to invest into promises? You will not earn more, trust me.
Big sales are on cryptocurrencies, on cryptocurrencies that are really working, solving a real problem, so why you want to invest into promises? You will not earn more, trust me.
I see your point and I agree with you, people should pay attention to existing projects before thinking about investing in some ICO. But still, most of the good projects started somehow, people are waking up and we see many projects popping out, some of them worth attention. Is it a new idea, a better concept, something new on the market..whatever that is and if you like it you need to support it with your investment.
Nice one, if I must participate in an ICO then the major factor I would consider is the team, I must try to know the team backing the project ,also I go through the white paper to help me understand what the use case is.
I do not see anything positive why you should now invest into ICOs.
Big sales are on cryptocurrencies, on cryptocurrencies that are really working, solving a real problem, so why you want to invest into promises? You will not earn more, trust me.
Big sales are on cryptocurrencies, on cryptocurrencies that are really working, solving a real problem, so why you want to invest into promises? You will not earn more, trust me.
Waoh that is a lot of criteria. Perhaps bearing those in mind one should be able to make the the decision when it comes to choosing an ico
Steps to evaluate a good ICO:
1 Overall rating (overview)
2 main page
3 Power Forum (Forum)
4 Transaction Graph (Chart)
5 Trading volume (volume) 24h
6 Scale of investment capital (Market Cap)
7 Price rate
8 Papers proving ... (POS, POW, DPOS)
9 Current Supply (Current Offer)
10 Total supply (Total supply)
11 time a block (s)
12 Master / Supper / Full buttons
13 Mining / Ritual / Havest / Reward
Section / block
15 Budget for finance
16 development teams (development team)
The Elements
18 smart contracts
19 Reward mechanism (Reward)
MultiSig
21 Transaction Fee (Fee)
22 Block size (Blocksize);
23 Purse Purse (wallet)
24 Send Message (Private Message)
25 Inflation (Inflation)
26 Compare crypto with industry
27 WhitePaper
28 Path clearly visible
29 live support (slack, tele)
30 Youtube channels
Social Network (FB, steemit)
32 Twitter channels
33 Blockchain Explorer
34 fully hidden
35 new blockchain / new technology
36 Testnet
37 payment utilities
38 Practical applications
39 Example Name (Alias)
And through the 39 criteria above, I choose AION, ICON, NEO, WANCHAIN, BITDGREE, CURRENT !!
That's a good thing, you have many criteria for choosing a good ICO. Everyone must have their own way of choosing good ICO. For me personally, I will focus more on who the team behind, read the whitepaper and roadmap, and analyze the possibilities that can occur whether the project can attract a lot of investor interest and run until success.1 Overall rating (overview)
2 main page
3 Power Forum (Forum)
4 Transaction Graph (Chart)
5 Trading volume (volume) 24h
6 Scale of investment capital (Market Cap)
7 Price rate
8 Papers proving ... (POS, POW, DPOS)
9 Current Supply (Current Offer)
10 Total supply (Total supply)
11 time a block (s)
12 Master / Supper / Full buttons
13 Mining / Ritual / Havest / Reward
Section / block
15 Budget for finance
16 development teams (development team)
The Elements
18 smart contracts
19 Reward mechanism (Reward)
MultiSig
21 Transaction Fee (Fee)
22 Block size (Blocksize);
23 Purse Purse (wallet)
24 Send Message (Private Message)
25 Inflation (Inflation)
26 Compare crypto with industry
27 WhitePaper
28 Path clearly visible
29 live support (slack, tele)
30 Youtube channels
Social Network (FB, steemit)
32 Twitter channels
33 Blockchain Explorer
34 fully hidden
35 new blockchain / new technology
36 Testnet
37 payment utilities
38 Practical applications
39 Example Name (Alias)
And through the 39 criteria above, I choose AION, ICON, NEO, WANCHAIN, BITDGREE, CURRENT !!
No one really follows all this criteria when it comes to choosing a good ICO to invest in, it is however important to consider the token metrics, the team, the pre-ico progress and also if it has any really reasonable real life use .
Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
This time it's a little bit different to determine which is the best one and we can start it from determine where the ico create its own ICO, I meant about where exchange site that will have made the IEO for that ICO.I thought that that's enough to only use a single indicator like that right now. Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
I guess, we need to talk about IEO not ICO, but certain rules should be used here, some criteria must be taken into account. As IEO are checked by the exchanges, I guess, you need to pay attention to the product.
If you believe that it will be interesting to people and has a good future, you can invest in the project. Nevertheless, trading for me is the better choice still.
I see a kind of promotion at the end of OP's post 
, but actually it is ok, we must see carefully to pick ICO because it will affect on our money when we make investment in it. And usually ICO maybe at least have very active developers and do their progress according their roadmap.
, but actually it is ok, we must see carefully to pick ICO because it will affect on our money when we make investment in it. And usually ICO maybe at least have very active developers and do their progress according their roadmap. Yes, we must always be vigilant and more careful before investing in an ICO project, making sure that the entire project has a good work map. besides that we also have to see how the team experiences before managing the project that they want to develop, if they have good experience of course the project can also run well.
extensive network, partnership with bona fide agencies, solid teams, high hype, and good marketing (advertising on large platforms). That is one of the best criteria, in my opinion. The seriousness of the project can be seen from the marketing strategy and cooperation carried out with various competent parties.
Partnership is important for a new project to succeed. In addition to partnerships with large companies, the solidity of developer teams is also an important part of the success of a new project. Partnertship with large companies will provide a perspective on the business that is happening now and also for the development of a project
extensive network, partnership with bona fide agencies, solid teams, high hype, and good marketing (advertising on large platforms). That is one of the best criteria, in my opinion. The seriousness of the project can be seen from the marketing strategy and cooperation carried out with various competent parties.
Perhaps, we are hard to see it in a package instead of seeing them more on scamming activities. But I saw the market turns into good by now, it eventually changing its course for new environmental features where we could see more legit projects than of the fake ones. It is just have to exert some effort in finding those projects that we could a reliable market demand not just today but looking it forward in the future.
extensive network, partnership with bona fide agencies, solid teams, high hype, and good marketing (advertising on large platforms). That is one of the best criteria, in my opinion. The seriousness of the project can be seen from the marketing strategy and cooperation carried out with various competent parties.
Jump to: