Topic: How to choose a good ICO, what criteria? - page 2. (Read 859 times)
You stated a good point in the way to go when selecting good ICO as there will be a reason every project to be launch but ICO used to be good back then and it has turn to scam portal now for crypto and why many prefer using their funds on trading or IEO which is more secure and has no issue with listing.
it is a very good list, but not all bounty hunters can do that, because there are very many bounty campaign programs scattered, so most bounty hunters don't have time to check one by one, and that is also the reason for the many bounty hunters who still hit by a bounty scam trap
Now, It's a time of IEO While Initial Exchange Offering was present in 2017, it was overshadowed by the Initial Coin offerings. But with problems arising and no regulatory clarity on initial coin offerings, Initial Exchange Offerings have taken the front seat. Now Ieo takes a place of ico's because it is more safer and trustable than Ico's. https://tokensale.moozicore.com/
1. Always go through the project’s white paper
2. Team's qualification
3. Business model and future development
4. Open cap or Hard cap
2. Team's qualification
3. Business model and future development
4. Open cap or Hard cap
I actually help in promoting AION and Bitdegree. Believe me you don't need to look too deep before you know a project will have good prospects. Nearly all the projects we have this days are imitation of already existing ones. Good projects are solidly motivated probably because of idea behind them. Bitdegree is still doing great and if not because of the high volatility of the crypto, it would have been one of the top altcoin. Amon is still another great project. Although, the team are having a challenge in getting all the licenses required but I'm very optimistic it will make top list one day
I see a kind of promotion at the end of OP's post 
, but actually it is ok, we must see carefully to pick ICO because it will affect on our money when we make investment in it. And usually ICO maybe at least have very active developers and do their progress according their roadmap.
, but actually it is ok, we must see carefully to pick ICO because it will affect on our money when we make investment in it. And usually ICO maybe at least have very active developers and do their progress according their roadmap. Yes, we must always be vigilant and more careful before investing in an ICO project, making sure that the entire project has a good work map. besides that we also have to see how the team experiences before managing the project that they want to develop, if they have good experience of course the project can also run well.
It's much better if you're going to emphasize or expand what's on your list like explaining them one by one just like "youtube channels" what's with that? not because they have a youtube channel they're a good ICO it much better if you're going to explain like "they should have youtube channel which gives detailed information about the project and how it works and how it solves the existing problem"
Lastly, It's really irritating to see users who doesn't know how to use ~snip~ it's really irritating to eyes. There are some high rank members who doesn't know how to use it please visit this: THIS IS HOW TO USE SNIP UNCULTURED SWINES
Lastly, It's really irritating to see users who doesn't know how to use ~snip~ it's really irritating to eyes. There are some high rank members who doesn't know how to use it please visit this: THIS IS HOW TO USE SNIP UNCULTURED SWINES
I see a kind of promotion at the end of OP's post , but actually it is ok, we must see carefully to pick ICO because it will affect on our money when we make investment in it. And usually ICO maybe at least have very active developers and do their progress according their roadmap.
, but actually it is ok, we must see carefully to pick ICO because it will affect on our money when we make investment in it. And usually ICO maybe at least have very active developers and do their progress according their roadmap. 
No one really follows all this criteria when it comes to choosing a good ICO to invest in, it is however important to consider the token metrics, the team, the pre-ico progress and also if it has any really reasonable real life use .
Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
This time it's a little bit different to determine which is the best one and we can start it from determine where the ico create its own ICO, I meant about where exchange site that will have made the IEO for that ICO.I thought that that's enough to only use a single indicator like that right now. Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
No one really follows all this criteria when it comes to choosing a good ICO to invest in, it is however important to consider the token metrics, the team, the pre-ico progress and also if it has any really reasonable real life use .
Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
I think the most important thing in a project is the developer team. With a solid team, a project goes on to achieve goals such as those in the whitepaper or roadmap. In addition, an exchanger where a project is traded also determines because it is related to liquidity
The list give by OP is almost complete. We have to check all that details to be able to determine if the project is quite good to be successful in the future. Though the assurance is not 100% when all the criterias were met. That is my suggestion, what are the normal values or data of every criteria or what are the things we should know about every criteria? As for me, I focused on the whitepaper and to the development team. If the two do not passed on my evaluation, I will not check the rest on the list.
No one really follows all this criteria when it comes to choosing a good ICO to invest in, it is however important to consider the token metrics, the team, the pre-ico progress and also if it has any really reasonable real life use .
Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
Also a patnership with existing projects can be deceiving so you have to be careful.
Over all strong community and investors will help you to find good ICO. Main criteria is main page, transaction volume and social support.
I pay most attention to the supply of the tokens, ICO price, and the team ability.
On these criteria's i select the ICO.
On these criteria's i select the ICO.
Steps to evaluate a good ICO:
1 Overall rating (overview)
2 main page
3 Power Forum (Forum)
4 Transaction Graph (Chart)
5 Trading volume (volume) 24h
6 Scale of investment capital (Market Cap)
7 Price rate
8 Papers proving ... (POS, POW, DPOS)
9 Current Supply (Current Offer)
10 Total supply (Total supply)
11 time a block (s)
12 Master / Supper / Full buttons
13 Mining / Ritual / Havest / Reward
Section / block
15 Budget for finance
16 development teams (development team)
The Elements
18 smart contracts
19 Reward mechanism (Reward)
MultiSig
21 Transaction Fee (Fee)
22 Block size (Blocksize);
23 Purse Purse (wallet)
24 Send Message (Private Message)
25 Inflation (Inflation)
26 Compare crypto with industry
27 WhitePaper
28 Path clearly visible
29 live support (slack, tele)
30 Youtube channels
Social Network (FB, steemit)
32 Twitter channels
33 Blockchain Explorer
34 fully hidden
35 new blockchain / new technology
36 Testnet
37 payment utilities
38 Practical applications
39 Example Name (Alias)
And through the 39 criteria above, I choose AION, ICON, NEO, WANCHAIN, BITDGREE, CURRENT !!
1.Team Composition-especially the development team and the advisory board. Look up each team member for relevant experience.1 Overall rating (overview)
2 main page
3 Power Forum (Forum)
4 Transaction Graph (Chart)
5 Trading volume (volume) 24h
6 Scale of investment capital (Market Cap)
7 Price rate
8 Papers proving ... (POS, POW, DPOS)
9 Current Supply (Current Offer)
10 Total supply (Total supply)
11 time a block (s)
12 Master / Supper / Full buttons
13 Mining / Ritual / Havest / Reward
Section / block
15 Budget for finance
16 development teams (development team)
The Elements
18 smart contracts
19 Reward mechanism (Reward)
MultiSig
21 Transaction Fee (Fee)
22 Block size (Blocksize);
23 Purse Purse (wallet)
24 Send Message (Private Message)
25 Inflation (Inflation)
26 Compare crypto with industry
27 WhitePaper
28 Path clearly visible
29 live support (slack, tele)
30 Youtube channels
Social Network (FB, steemit)
32 Twitter channels
33 Blockchain Explorer
34 fully hidden
35 new blockchain / new technology
36 Testnet
37 payment utilities
38 Practical applications
39 Example Name (Alias)
And through the 39 criteria above, I choose AION, ICON, NEO, WANCHAIN, BITDGREE, CURRENT !!
2.Stage of the project and VC investments-Evaluate the stage of the project.Does it only have a whitepaper? A beta version? Is there a launched product with limited functionality?VCs (venture capital) tend to invest and support projects from early stages. Look for this information usually on the main page of the project’s website.
3.Community and Media
4.Bitcointalk.org Thread- Bitcointalk is the biggest forum for Bitcoin and crypto related issues. It is strongly recommended that you read the messages carefully. Investor’s concerns will be answered in this thread.
5.Unlimited / Hard cap
6.What do they need the token for? Is the blockchain necessary?
7.Token distribution – when and how
8.Quality of the code
9.Evaluating the Whitepaper
10.The Bottom Line-t is key to investigate and read as much information as possible and write down all the important aspects, positive and negative, before making an investment decision.
product based
1. Team: Do they have a solid team or just Randy from Idaho in his basement?
2. Technology: Is their technology solid, or atleast, could their future technology be unique?
3. Timeline: Is this company going to take 5 years to launch, or is it in the near future?
2. Technology: Is their technology solid, or atleast, could their future technology be unique?
3. Timeline: Is this company going to take 5 years to launch, or is it in the near future?
1. Investors
2. Trading volume
3. Price rate
4. Whitepaper
2. Trading volume
3. Price rate
4. Whitepaper
I think it's very hard to analyze like that but it has sense. The main criteria you have to admit are idea, team, technology and will be that project useful. Even the team is not so important because when the idea will be popular then they can hire top developers and finish the idea.
The market of crypto is so unpredictable that even the good idea, good ICO etc could not be done because of many reasons.
The market of crypto is so unpredictable that even the good idea, good ICO etc could not be done because of many reasons.
It is a great list, but if I always checked on every step, I'd always be late for token sales it is all good, but there's no need to do So much research. I can go with max ten of them.
it is all good, but there's no need to do So much research. I can go with max ten of them. Yes, There is)) I can recommend NCRYPTO. It’s a tool used to simplify and economic ally optimize interactions between business and individuals, rather than offer another way of crowdfunding or running so-called ICO
Jump to: