I am searching for a great bounty manager and in 90 percent of cases this decision solves all the problems. When you have a trusted manager it almost guarantees that you won't take part in a fraud project.
I would advise you not to rely 100% guarantee on the words of the Bounty manager of the company. To date, even the very authoritative names of managers already have a tarnished reputation. 
Topic: How to Choose better Bounty Projects? - page 6. (Read 22417 times)
There is one thing I find out about choosing better bounties ,the ones that go wrong are mainly running on erc20 blockchain because for scammers its easier to use erc20 smart contract but I like coins that runs on other algorithms like cryptonight ,scrypt ,sha256d ,in the past I have no issue with no getting paid after bounty ends, for example I joined slate bounty which runs on its own blockchain and I got paid ,same other too ,smart contract like erc20 is like scammers haven
I only have a very simple choice, namely by choosing a bounty based on the platform that released the bounty list. and the best in my opinion is the bounty platform and bounty hive.
But i think Bountyhive promoting many scam ICO project few people's claiming and creating some thread against bountyhive if this is very reputed bounty platform. 
Ignore them, you must look at the team is one of the arrangement breaking factor with regards to putting and in the potential achievement of an ICO. The center group should have a demonstrated reputation of achievement in their own industry.
To the eyes of potential crypto specialists, a feature of their mind boggling information and encounters inside their field of aptitude obviously elucidates the motivation behind the task. Having such group include certainty as well as goes about as an assurance that the venture isn't a trick.
To the eyes of potential crypto specialists, a feature of their mind boggling information and encounters inside their field of aptitude obviously elucidates the motivation behind the task. Having such group include certainty as well as goes about as an assurance that the venture isn't a trick.
When choosing a bounty, I usually pay attention to such things as:
1. Reputation of the organizers. Famous people should stand behind the campaign.
2. The amount of investment in ICO. The more money raised, the greater the likelihood of success.
3. The number of participants in the bounty company. If too many people took part in the campaign, then everyone will get very small amounts.
4. Feedback on the project. If the project is not mentioned anywhere, it is better to bypass it.
5. Feedback from company representatives.
6. Objectives of the project. They must be real and doable.
1. Reputation of the organizers. Famous people should stand behind the campaign.
2. The amount of investment in ICO. The more money raised, the greater the likelihood of success.
3. The number of participants in the bounty company. If too many people took part in the campaign, then everyone will get very small amounts.
4. Feedback on the project. If the project is not mentioned anywhere, it is better to bypass it.
5. Feedback from company representatives.
6. Objectives of the project. They must be real and doable.
I only have a very simple choice, namely by choosing a bounty based on the platform that released the bounty list. and the best in my opinion is the bounty platform and bounty hive.
But i think Bountyhive promoting many scam ICO project few people's claiming and creating some thread against bountyhive if this is very reputed bounty platform.
I agree with most of your point but the nature of the project also determine the success of project most of the time.
I think that today it’s as difficult to choose a normal project as it is to make some serious investment, so I see that today you have to try to start to get serious about business. Because everything happens very difficult.
You should take into account several key facts:
- If the bounty pool is too big there is a chance that it will be cut. And the number of the participants will remain the same. You will get a couple of bucks
- If the bounty manager is doing everything carelessly, there is a chance that you will get less than you deserved or even nothing.
- If the dates of the bounty campaign are not set and written strictly, it can last potentially forever. Especially if the ICO dates are not set either.
- If the rules and conditions of bounty tasks are not formulated strictly, they are likely to be very unobvious and can depend on bounty manager's mood, his grandma's health and Moon phase
Thanks for your advice! It is very useful for new bounty hunters, for me, I often join projects with reputable and famous managers, it will limit failed and deceptive projects.
I usually look at the complexity of the project and the composition of the team, especially if they are real people and are they capable of making this idea!
Its easy to find a good bounty projects if you know the way to find.as a bounty hunter I'm looking dor the aim and platforms of the project as well as the team and ico team. and also the achievements amd the product so i wont get scam and to earn money not toose time.
There are several ways to look at this. Some experts in bounty hunting prefer to follow the bounty programs managed by a renowned bounty manager who on several occasions has hosted successful bounty programs. But the best way is to do a personal research into the project. There are other promising bounties managed by low profile bounty manager yet becomes successful in the end.
I agree on most parts, just want to say that bounty manager has nothing with payments hence it is irrelevant if bounty manager is trusted or not, it only depends on team. Another thing is, you said funds raised are not important, I can tell you this is very important part because if project doesn't raise enough money they won't pay participants or they will pay less.
I agree with you to your opinion, So that's why raised funds was very important. And also that project was useless if they haven't funds or money to move forward the project. Money or funds is like a gas to boost or to start a machine. Once they have not money its zero meaning to this world.
There are many ways to choose good bounty campaigns and some of them team activity, region of the ICO (I noticed that Korean projects rarely end of as scam) and you have to research it like you are researching an ICO to invest in.
The number of participants in a project relaly matters, once I see that the people doing a particular bounty is too much, I just do not bother myself with that bounty anymore because it's just a waste of time.
The team plays a big role. Very cool and gives confidence if the team has previously developed a successful project, and are now engaged in a new one. Rarely, but still.
I'm always first investigating the manager of the bounty campaign. Then I do a general research about the project. And finally I look at the ICO scores. Especially in a market where there are a lot of paused or canceled projects, we need to do this kind of researchs.
With the increasing rate of fraudulent ICOs, choosing a good bounty to participate in is becoming harder. There are quite a number of things I consider while choosing a good bounty.
1 the progress of the ICO: before I partake in any bounty I check to see that they have met at least the softcap of the project
2 the credibility of the bounty managers
3 the integrity of the team
4 the number of participants already participating in the bounty
1 the progress of the ICO: before I partake in any bounty I check to see that they have met at least the softcap of the project
2 the credibility of the bounty managers
3 the integrity of the team
4 the number of participants already participating in the bounty
Jump to: