. You can't find out any good bounty campaign by these criterias. 
Topic: How to choose bounty? - page 19. (Read 22806 times)
Almost your criterias are shit. ICO listing site? Design of website? Number of telegram group member? LOL. At first every ICO project can pay for ICO listing sites to get high score and they also can pay money for the best designer to designer a website for them and they also can pay money to buy tons of telegram member but it's fake member . You can't find out any good bounty campaign by these criterias.
. You can't find out any good bounty campaign by these criterias.
choosing a bounty is simple.. dont they are all junk just invest with money like a normal person
When choosing a bounty, first of all I pay attention to the project itself. What he is and how much he enjoys the interest of investors. Next, everything else.
ICO rating is one of the best positive point in every ICO i think but a lot of peoples can't believe rating. Number of subscribers in telegram it's totally bullshit because you can buy telegram member to using some dollars. Social networks is a big deal and also websites design is too important.
Yes, I agree with issue of telegram members, now many people provide services to make fake members even one package with telegram group / channel, funny thing is that I used to rely on telegram problems but now it's no longer 
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
ICO rating is one of the best positive point in every ICO i think but a lot of peoples can't believe rating. Number of subscribers in telegram it's totally bullshit because you can buy telegram member to using some dollars. Social networks is a big deal and also websites design is too important. 1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I dont agree with some options. For example, ICO rating sites are all scam. They make a review for payment. Number os subscribers in Telegram chat isn't so important. All groups are with bots. With all other I agree.
You have a great list, that will help you to identify any scam project. If you are really spending time, by investigating any project, it should not be a problem for you, to find a great and legit ICO, even on such a market.
I think that the choice of bounty company should be made on all the same parameters, how to choose the ICO in which you want to invest. The only difference is also the choice of the bounty Manager of the company, as proven managers are more preferable.
I think if you choose the famous bounty manager, the disadvantage is that a lot of other people think like you. You and they will join and the number of shares you divide will be very small and you will not get much money from the bounty
You have left out the most important thing: the product. Without that, analyzing an ICO is useless. If we have a product with a proper use case then we can look at other parameters
This is a valuable addition but I don't think that is all, a lot of projects have a good activity in their telegram group, the team is legit, and also have a lot of these points you listed but will still not keep to their promise on bounties.
I think bounty hunting has a big element of luck to it.
I think bounty hunting has a big element of luck to it.
Right now choose the right campaign is very difficult. if you are new to the market, then it is better to ask for help to professionals at the initial stages. it will be not expensive
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
The offer mentioned are visible criteria for good icos but some other times it good to carry out your own personal research about the project before subscribing to either invest in them or take part in their bounty program. And in doing that you can take your time to study the project White paper and chose a token that are utility base because their have long term potential. 1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
I think the numbers of subscribers on their telegram doesn't really ensure what a good bounty is. Still, some bounty with too much member in their telegram is found out to buy the member. The best thing to do here is to filter out the reputation of the bounty through the quality message of the members in their telegram group.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
The most important factor in finding a potential bounty is the hype. In addition to the factors you listed, I found that investigating the potential of the project was the most important thing. In addition, the quantity of Token projects for bounty is more or less is also something I often consider when choosing a bounty project.
I think you have to investigate a lot some ICO before investing, especially in this bearmarket is quite difficult to succeed when the currency you use to trade is falling in price every day, that means that tomorrow's investment is worth less today and so you can't do business, so if it were you, would stop a little the investment until the market recovers.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Talking about design of the site, mostly i'm looking into this point when i reviewing project because some of them had a terrible design, and i always avoiding it. Number of subs in Telegram are not needed too much at all, because most of them are bots/fake account, or airdropers that only joining for reward, not for the project itself. Huge partnership had a high value, also social network and activity of the project.
I start with the vision of the project and the idea behind and imagine what benefit will it bring to crypto space.
Then analyzing all the rest you have mentioned, but all those are only tools to achieve the project ideas.
Then analyzing all the rest you have mentioned, but all those are only tools to achieve the project ideas.
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
Most of these criterias listed here are now what most of the scammer also use now to convince investors which does not guarantee one of no being scam. No 3 is worth to consider because most of these scam don't have enough time to post on social media. They won't provide enough post to retweet and they will be the one who will make them compulsory
Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
When I need to choose a new bounty, I look for promising projects, especially from those that collected good amounts of money in the course of pre sales.
Depends on your taste what bounty you choose. If you think the project is good ofcoarse bounty project is good to. Researching about bounty can help to know what bounty is good to join and to avoid useless bounty campaign.
Jump to: