In fact, to find potential projects, we have to carry out complex research, which means there are many aspects that need to be looked at. I have my own way of identifying a project, as follows:
1. Looking at the fundamentals
2. Looking at the teams
3. Looking at the investors and backers.
4. Looking at the tokenomics.
5. Looking at the community
Yep, these are also aspects we can consider to find a good ALtcoin. Searching to find an Altcoin that we can safely invest in for the long term is a process that requires in-depth digging, there are many criteria we can set to choose, and sometimes we just need to meet a few important criteria, we can think about investing to them. It is not necessary to ensure all criteria. This is very perfectionistic and sometimes we will miss a lot of good growth projects.
Step 3: Find a nice entry, price it right by comparing with projects that are similar to the project you are aiming for (for example, layer 2 array if you are planning to invest in ARB, you can compare it with OP ), from there you can estimate what capitalization level is reasonable to buy.
To compare 2 altcoins from the same category, you can use
Marketcapof, there you will easily get multiples by comparing the MC of 2 projects.
Using Marketcap to compare 2 projects is the simplest and most intuitive way. Besides, we can consider many other factors such as the community, TVL, investment funds and who is the MM team behind them. The most obvious examples are Arb and Op. Maybe in terms of technology ,community and Arb's TVL is superior to OP, but the investment fund behind Op is not much and not spread out like Arb, so it will be easier for MM to set up to push the price than Arb. You should combine many screening criteria to make the most reasonable choice.