Topic: How to know a good bounty - page 4. (Read 10375 times)

In the crypto world, surprises often occur, because everything is difficult to predict. What you say is true, because no matter how good our
research results on a project, still there is no guarantee that the project can provide a satisfactory payment. There are several factors that
cause the value of the reward tokens that we get from the bounty the price can change drastically. As I said before there is a luck factor that
can finally make us get a good payout from the bounty. That's why I never get my hopes up too high every time I join a bounty. I am afraid of
being disappointed the results are far from my expectations, even though I have sacrificed my time to promote these projects. So let it hang on
my luck, the important thing is I've done my best to choose a good bounty.


It's true that we should prioritize bounties that use escrow for payments, so that we can at least make sure we get paid as promised,
although sometimes the reward tokens obtained are of no value and cannot be sold. But at least there's some satisfaction in getting paid.
There's something even safer, by choosing a bounty with stablecoins paid, I admit it is safe and quite satisfying. Unfortunately it is very rare
for bounties to pay with stablecoins. Despite the many disappointing from bounties, but several times I've followed a bounty with good pay,
meaning as long as we don't give up and can be patient in facing a bad situation. At least the bounty is still good enough as a side job to be
able to make additional money without the need to spend money.

You should care about the project, not the aesthetics. Most people join the project based on the design of the bounty page. No, it shouldn't be like that. You need to pay attention to the potential and vision of the project. In addition, the profile of the person who organizes the bounty program is an important factor for me.

It's actually quite difficult to know which bounties are good or not. Bounties that have high potential or not will be difficult to find. I'm still a beginner so I don't know much. but at least I'm sure that a good manager will choose a good bounty project. so the reputation of the manager can be used as a reference here. because a conscientious manager will definitely not accept a project arbitrarily. because it could damage his reputation if his campaign project turned out to be a scam.

I consider it 50/50 for the bounty analysis factor and luck, because no matter how good the project concept does not guarantee high payouts because the token price is not expected, but sometimes we see bounty projects have low analytical values based on whitepaper reviews and news updates, but who would have thought they distributed the highest paid for bounty hunters.

I admit it's not easy to find a good bounty, sometimes we've done some research first as you said, by checking the teams project, white paper
and social media. But still often we end up getting bad bounties, which several times the bounty I participated in paid with trash tokens,
which couldn't be sold because tokens never entered the exchange. Or even the reward tokens given are of no value, because before reward tokens
were distributed, by the teams project had been dumped first. It doesn't even guarantee that the bounty managed by a trusted bounty manager will
get a good bounty. The conclusion now is that most of the bounties circulating are bad and we really don't have high hopes for the bounty,
later we can be disappointed in the end. For me finding good bounties sometimes takes luck too.

Beside make our research to know with good project on team developing this important thing why choose experience with Bounty Manager because they know about fake team developer, try to get investor and coins success sold on public sale then not listing yet on exchange market or listing with dapp exchange market only like Pancakeswap for usually BSC coin network right now.
Most difficult nowadays to find with potential project bounty campaign after with many time price drop when listing and reward sending to bounty participants, not only with reward reduced but also investor get loss money with bad project building because have lower price when listing on exchange market.

You have to see the founder and team of the Bounty, sometimes many of them are fake, just want to deceive investors, overall you have to check the web and their white paper well, many things to learn in the assessment of the Bounty.

I realize a few bounties are currently successful and honest, the rest are problematic of all.

There are many aspects to access a bounty to know if it will be successful or not. Escrow is one aspect of bounty that gives a good assurance that a bounty could be successful, especially if it is being held by a reputable bounty manager. If the escrow is in USDT or other stable coin, then that helps to increase the trust. Apart from these mentioned points, it is really difficult to know which bounty will be successful. Once the bounty departs form being escrow, then, it is a higher risk.

Though, in some instances you should not even trust the team. One of the bounty I participated in, did not pay because one of the bounty management team absconded with the funds. That is, the project owner paid the team in their wallet only for one of the bounty management team members to abscond with the funds - so we were told by the manager.

Many project/token owners have refused to pay the hunters after their project was completed in recent times. And most times, since they are online, it is all about making themselves inaccessible, and that will be the end of the project. Some go as far as deleting their website and other social accounts for completely scam projects.

Even with a good manager, some projects end up paying hunters worthless tokens - that is not up to one dollar in some instances. A bounty can only be said to be a success when it has rewarded hunters as well as well as success in the IDO, ICO or other marketing activity as the case may be.

Bounty offering who have good bounty manager and escrow, it's good enough to know that rewards are available

once the time frame was already done, though there's no assurance if the bounty rewards will be rewardful or if you will gain
something from the offer, but it's better than no rewards at all. You have to learn how to pick the right team who is conducting
the bounty and prepare yourself not to lean much with the potential amount of possible rewards.

First you have to know the level of trust of the bounty management manager, because those who have a good reputation, rarely do anything related to failure to pay, unless they fail to be paid by the project owner, it's not entirely the manager's fault.
This is what you have to distinguish, failed to be paid by the project owner or bounty manager (Manager)

When finding a bounty, select a bounty with escrow, meaning the project team payment is already with the manager. we cannot determine which bounty is good or bad.
You can also check the Bounty manager's reputation. 

Some of these factors you mentioned are not a yardstick or guarantee a good bounty. Let take a look at them one after the other.
1. Responsible manager: does this guarantee a good bounty? The answer is obviously NO. Haven't you seen a reputable managers manage a failed project?
2. Good project: the question here is how do you identify a good project?
3. Weekly distribution: aside signature campaign, most of the project won't agree to this term. And besides, I don't see this workable for some managers who always update sheets lately.
4. Project is Already in the market: going by this, you've ruled out new projects conducting a bounty which in one way or another help to grow their projects.
Conclusively, the above can help reduce the risk but not absolutely a factor to know a good bounty. After all, it's all about taking risks.

there are no parameters or benchmarks to know a bounty project is good or not. because no one knows what the future fate of a project will be.
Many successful bounty projects do not pay bounty participants or reduce the allocation for bounties. I think right now it's best to participate in a bounty that uses escrow because the payment is clear.

The bounty manager is only the person responsible for the marketing part of the project under the agreement with the project owner. They are not part of the project, so they cannot know the project's plan and its future.
In my opinion, we better stop working with bounty campaigns, they can't really generate any worthy profit. Today we have other methods such as learning to make money from exchanges or signing up for a program to experience projects that do not have a product on the market. Give them ideas to help them improve the product and they'll be well rewarded for the best contributors.
This way also does not guarantee 100% that we will be rewarded, if we do not receive the reward, at least we will accumulate knowledge and experience.

There are a lot of factors on how to know a good bounty.
1. Responsible Bounty Manager, I think that is a very important factor.
2. Good project, if the good manager is good bad the project who are promoted by the bounty team is worse, then it was a failure.
3. At least pick a bounty that offers the weekly distribution of rewards.
4. The project is already in the market.

True and I forgot to include that bounty manager isn't always how you determine a good bounty as their work is only in that field and not identifying a scam project that is why I included 99% are scam and only 1% are legit. With that, you give support to that one. I would say when you quoted my post that should be the additional information that knowing a good bounty is very hard because some hide in plain sight like the one you explained.

When choosing to join the bounty project, bounty hunters may use this as one of their primary references. If they base their decision on too many previous events, the work and results will not be related. My final point is that at least the bounty manager has received positive feedback. However, it is difficult to identify good bounties these days because even those managed by trusted forum members always turn out to be scams. If you look at some projects' white papers and road maps, you might think they are genuine, but in the end, they are always frauds. Today, bounty offers a lot of shitcoins. Everyone is simply participating in various bounties in the hopes that they will one day earn money from them.

^Even a bounty manager does not know the outcome of the project, because sometimes there is a project that sounds good to be true and they have all signed as a good project. But when if they will not survive or they will not hit the sales target during ICO, most likely it will end up as an exit scam and the manager has nothing to do with it. New projects as of now if you really wanted to invest it seems like gambling, yes because it has a high risk of being scammed and it is the same when you are in gambling it is a highly chance that will lose your fund.

Everybody is just participating in different bounty hoping that one day they will make money from it, identifying good bounty is difficult now because even trusted managers on the forum always end up as scam bounty, if you see some projects white paper and road map you will think the project is real but at the end it always turn out to be scam.

 To identify a good bounty, you need to read the project, see its roadmap, its partners, its team's experience, and then look at the quality of the team managing it. What is giving in reward. Then you will have no problem in getting a good bounty.   By the way, many bounties keep coming.  Which are often scammed. Or the majority of which are bounties that give in the form of reward in tokens. If the token of this project is listed on an exchange or there is a chance to be listed in the coming times and  If the project is running with a strong and standard and with a good roadmap, its chances of success are also high. Otherwise, the project often fails. And the token is of no use. The best bounties are those whose gave reward  in the form of stablecoins.  For example, BUSD or USDT. Apart from this, it also depends heavily on those who manage the bounties. For example, Bounty Detective and Brain Boss are the best bounty managers, whose bounty is always guaranteed. These often reward in stablecoins Give everyone their reward honestly.