hsrminer - Nvidia mining software for various algos by palgin&alexkap - page 11.

maggari

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

With this HSR "test" miner: Around 23500 h/s
KlausT: 23500 h/s

1070-1070ti-1080 cards. Total speed should be over 26500 h/s if those readings on miner screens would have anything to do with reality. So after all, you are only lending your miner rigs for free. This is the reason why this miner is closed source, because there's no actual increasement despite what numbers are shown. Closed source because only thing added is a fee. I suggest everyone to run 24hour test with KlausT and this test-miner, then have a look for what your wallet hashrate tells you. Roll Eyes

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: ggong on January 29, 2018, 05:55:33 AM

Quote from: MagicSmoker on January 25, 2018, 05:55:58 AM

Letting hsrminer set intensity has resulted in a mysterious drop in hashrate by 100-150 kH/s after 1-3 hours of operation, and this is with two separate GTX 1080 on two very different machines. But in the spirit of science I'll try your suggestions. I noticed you don't mention anything about core clock, though, and that seems to be the source of woes for me.

Right now my Asus GTX 1080 ROG Strix edition is hashing at 1208 kH/s while drawing 166W at 85% PL, -125 core (varying between 1595 to 1670) and +300 mem (4811). (while typing this the hashrate dropped to 1176 kH/s... sigh).

My older EVGA GTX 1080 FE is hashing at 1218 kH/s while drawing 146W at 85% PL, +125 core (1633 to 1658) and +300 mem (4811 again).

In both cases setting -i 4 resulted in about 100 kH/s lower hashrate but with no real change in stability, at least for the FE card; I didn't bother repeating the same experiment with the Asus.

I've found that too much of a memclock boost creates instability (and I haven't seen any benefit), though maybe it's because I have different cards. I'm running about +150 core and +200 mem at 80% power on 1070 and 1060 3G, getting a slight hashrate boost but extremely stable. Around the 1700/4000 range for both, and 1160kH/s and 740kH/s on 1070 and 1060. Also getting 500kH/s on 1050 Ti @ stock clocks and 80% power, all very stable.

Huh, I hadn't messed with mem clock much at all so I'll give your suggestion a try. Right now I have both 1080's tied up conducting a head-to-head comparison between NiceHack® and Nemosminer/MiningPoolHub which will be running for another few days but I've been noticing occasional artefacting/black screens on the ROG Strix 1080 and that does point to vram memory errors (core errors invariably lock up the GPU completely).

ggong

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Quote from: MagicSmoker on January 25, 2018, 05:55:58 AM

Quote from: Kompik on January 25, 2018, 05:27:40 AM

Your mem clock is extremely low for this type of memory. Set it to 5400 at least, also delete the intesity setting. HSR miner will do the job for you and set it better. Also if you have such low temp, maybe it is not good idea to lower power limit especially for neoscrypt.

Letting hsrminer set intensity has resulted in a mysterious drop in hashrate by 100-150 kH/s after 1-3 hours of operation, and this is with two separate GTX 1080 on two very different machines. But in the spirit of science I'll try your suggestions. I noticed you don't mention anything about core clock, though, and that seems to be the source of woes for me.

Right now my Asus GTX 1080 ROG Strix edition is hashing at 1208 kH/s while drawing 166W at 85% PL, -125 core (varying between 1595 to 1670) and +300 mem (4811). (while typing this the hashrate dropped to 1176 kH/s... sigh).

My older EVGA GTX 1080 FE is hashing at 1218 kH/s while drawing 146W at 85% PL, +125 core (1633 to 1658) and +300 mem (4811 again).

In both cases setting -i 4 resulted in about 100 kH/s lower hashrate but with no real change in stability, at least for the FE card; I didn't bother repeating the same experiment with the Asus.

I've found that too much of a memclock boost creates instability (and I haven't seen any benefit), though maybe it's because I have different cards. I'm running about +150 core and +200 mem at 80% power on 1070 and 1060 3G, getting a slight hashrate boost but extremely stable. Around the 1700/4000 range for both, and 1160kH/s and 740kH/s on 1070 and 1060. Also getting 500kH/s on 1050 Ti @ stock clocks and 80% power, all very stable.

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: genmauer on January 28, 2018, 03:38:38 PM

Sorry for that, but you thing it's safe? I bit worried, because the devs don't show up.

Yes, it's perfectly safe. The explanation I read elsewhere - and which makes perfect sense - is that mining programs are being flagged for their behavior, not because of actual malware-infection. I really wish Windows Defender had a way to easily mark a hit as a false positive rather than immediately delete the item and force a reboot on me, because that leads me to adding an exclusion to the very folders that will be first to encounter real malware - my downloads folder, USB drives and mining folder; so, counter-productive if the goal is to actually protect me.

genmauer

newbie

Activity: 84

Merit: 0

Quote from: MagicSmoker on January 27, 2018, 09:16:07 PM

Quote from: genmauer on January 27, 2018, 08:08:21 PM

I using HSR Miner for the week, and been amazing, but today show a Trojan.

Trojan:Win32/Tiggre!plock

It's annoying yeasterday don't show nothing.
Any tips?

Look, I realize it's unrealistic to read every single post in a nearly 1000 post thread, but at least read the first and last pages... More specifically, post 926.

Sorry for that, but you thing it's safe? I bit worried, because the devs don't show up.

edwin-1

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: edwin-1 on January 28, 2018, 08:56:17 AM

try to run it, speed is faster than others miner
but in some a few minute , it become stop
try another miner app, it runs normal with same algorithm
Virtual memory already have been set more than total GPU memory.
GPU 1060,1070,1080ti.

Any solution ?

Update
use parameter -i 1, now became more stable
i will see on the some hours

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: cryptocentralized on January 28, 2018, 08:47:34 AM

Quote from: MagicSmoker on January 28, 2018, 08:31:00 AM

Quote from: cryptocentralized on January 28, 2018, 08:23:46 AM

Hi all,

All i am getting is rejected shares due to duplicate share. I am using altminer as my pool and have got ccminer working already. I have two gtx970's and my conf file is

hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:10001 -u WALLET-ADDRESS -p x -i 2 -c 3

Thanks

That's not the correct format for altminer.net; you need something more like this:

hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -i 2 -c 3 -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:10001 -u WALLET-ADDRESS -p c=TZC

Just tried that. The miner starts up but still all my shares are rejected now with a invalid job ID

Looks like that port is for VIVO, so -p c=VIVO should be used instead. Maybe drop the -i and -c parameters completely and let hsrminer set those?

edwin-1

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

try to run it, speed is faster than others miner
but in some a few minute , it become stop
try another miner app, it runs normal with same algorithm
Virtual memory already have been set more than total GPU memory.
GPU 1060,1070,1080ti.

Any solution ?

cryptocentralized

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: MagicSmoker on January 28, 2018, 08:31:00 AM

Quote from: cryptocentralized on January 28, 2018, 08:23:46 AM

Hi all,

All i am getting is rejected shares due to duplicate share. I am using altminer as my pool and have got ccminer working already. I have two gtx970's and my conf file is

hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:10001 -u WALLET-ADDRESS -p x -i 2 -c 3

Thanks

That's not the correct format for altminer.net; you need something more like this:

hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -i 2 -c 3 -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:10001 -u WALLET-ADDRESS -p c=TZC

Just tried that. The miner starts up but still all my shares are rejected now with a invalid job ID

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: cryptocentralized on January 28, 2018, 08:23:46 AM

Hi all,

All i am getting is rejected shares due to duplicate share. I am using altminer as my pool and have got ccminer working already. I have two gtx970's and my conf file is

hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:10001 -u WALLET-ADDRESS -p x -i 2 -c 3

Thanks

That's not the correct format for altminer.net; you need something more like this:

hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -i 2 -c 3 -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:10001 -u WALLET-ADDRESS -p c=TZC

cryptocentralized

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Hi all,

All i am getting is rejected shares due to duplicate share. I am using altminer as my pool and have got ccminer working already. I have two gtx970's and my conf file is

hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:10001 -u WALLET-ADDRESS -p x -i 2 -c 3

Thanks

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: katak on January 28, 2018, 05:18:19 AM

I have seen the increase on my pool, GTX1080 is working now at 1.38 MH/s* for 4 days and steady as rock.

More details please on actual core and mem clocks as well as power limit. I have two different GTX 1080 - an EVGA Founder's Edition and an Asus ROG Strix - and the best consistent speed I can attain is 1230 kH/s, and even this is in question based on the cumulative earnings over a 4.5 hour period on a high volume Neoscrypt pool that I trust.

* - units corrected to MH/s.

katak

member

Activity: 100

Merit: 10

Quote from: maggari on January 27, 2018, 11:46:54 PM

According to pool, there's no increase in actual hashrate. I will let you know more in next hours, when I get screenshots without HSRminer. But for now, it seems I could donate my kidney if HSRminer is faster, users are only "donating" to this closed source makers... aka makers are stealing your hashrate.

But hey, who am I to judge. Roll Eyes

When there's money involved in any form, these things pop up.

Hello,

I have seen the increase on my pool, GTX1080 is working now at 1.38KH/s for 4 days and steady as rock.

++

maggari

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

According to pool, there's no increase in actual hashrate. I will let you know more in next hours, when I get screenshots without HSRminer. But for now, it seems I could donate my kidney if HSRminer is faster, users are only "donating" to this closed source makers... aka makers are stealing your hashrate.

But hey, who am I to judge. Roll Eyes

When there's money involved in any form, these things pop up.

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: genmauer on January 27, 2018, 08:08:21 PM

I using HSR Miner for the week, and been amazing, but today show a Trojan.

Trojan:Win32/Tiggre!plock

It's annoying yeasterday don't show nothing.
Any tips?

Look, I realize it's unrealistic to read every single post in a nearly 1000 post thread, but at least read the first and last pages... More specifically, post 926.

genmauer

newbie

Activity: 84

Merit: 0

I using HSR Miner for the week, and been amazing, but today show a Trojan.

Trojan:Win32/Tiggre!plock

It's annoying yeasterday don't show nothing.
Any tips?

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: Elder III on January 27, 2018, 05:11:07 PM

For what it's worth, we have a number of rigs using this miner for the past couple of weeks or so and have not had any significant drop in hashrate over time. All of the rigs are on Windows 10 Pro with page file set to the total amount of Vram plus a little bit extra. 80% power limit and a moderate core OC (+100-175 depending on the model of GPU). --- 388.71 drivers, vga drivers only installed, no audio, 3dsurround, geforce experience etc installed.

Yes, I managed to get this to run very consistently with my FE GTX 1080, but hashrate dropped after some period of time on both my Asus ROG Strix 1080 and my one "real" rig of 6x GTX 1060.

Worse is that I just mined TZC for 4.5 hour with my 6x 1060 rig on the official pool (which finds blocks every few minutes) and got credited for 15.8 coins instead of the expected 18.4 - that's about 15% less, meaning my effective hashrate was more like 3700 kH/s rather than the 4300 kH/s claimed by the program. In fact, that makes the effective hashrate worse than ccminer-klaust 8.19...

I'm not sure what's going on here, but it sure looks funky from my perspective.

Elder III

sr. member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 274

For what it's worth, we have a number of rigs using this miner for the past couple of weeks or so and have not had any significant drop in hashrate over time. All of the rigs are on Windows 10 Pro with page file set to the total amount of Vram plus a little bit extra. 80% power limit and a moderate core OC (+100-175 depending on the model of GPU). --- 388.71 drivers, vga drivers only installed, no audio, 3dsurround, geforce experience etc installed.

SCSI2

full member

Activity: 206

Merit: 100

Quote from: stevascha on January 27, 2018, 02:03:58 PM

Quote from: jugger1028 on January 26, 2018, 08:39:50 AM

lol, virtually memory is most definitely a very big factor. Mining rigs usually have 4-8gb of ram and if you have even 1 or 2 cards with low virtual memory you will most definitely get crashes and errors. I run 8 1080ti's, I need 88gb of virtual memory minimum. My system hasn't crashed in weeks and my oc settings are 90%tdp, +100 +600 (some cores run +150 on my hybrids). No crashes.

Go to system, advanced settings (on left side) then advanced tab, then set it there.. Or just google changing virtual memory to get a more thorough guide.

how to count the minimum and maximum virtual memory?

Always set Min equal Max. You *really* don't want to have windows adjusting its pagefile size on the fly.

ferall

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 265

Open source yet?

Topic: hsrminer - Nvidia mining software for various algos by palgin&alexkap - page 11. (Read 30812 times)