When I joined I understood that difficulty would increase but I accepted that new members would make up for that. Now, I do not benefit from new members and I think it will be difficult to attract new investors due to ROI time, so if all power is directed at 10 oldest accounts, I will never see anything!
This is a complete change to the original concept and I am not content with only the 10 oldest accounts receiving any hashrate (apart from new deposits). This part needs a rethink, otherwise 10 individuals (or maybe less if they are owned by the same people) will benefit and no one else will.
I agree 100%. Thats why I think it would be right and fair to allocate some small amount of the new hashpower to older accounts. I have posted 10ths but even 1ths would be more than enough. If he is basing it on deposits, then we all have an even chance of seeing it work for us.
Eventually the difficulty will level off, and we will all see a benefit eventually even if it takes a year or so.
Let's wait until he gets the new hardware online and the new rules programmed in, and then we can see what needs to change and push him to do so.