Topic: I find way to win on dice - page 7. (Read 2146 times)

Anyone who thinks that martingale or any of its variants work is usually for a reason like the one you mention. They don't work and are a very bad strategy as I explained some time ago:

Why martingale is PURE SHIT.


What I explained there has also been pointed out by other forum members in this thread, as it is no secret. It has been known for more than 100 years. But as I predicted in that thread, no matter how much we explain it, we will still have people insisting that martingale or its variants work.

Let me guess, you must have just tried this method with small amount and you won some money using it. That's why you say this method is working to win on dice game. You were lucky enough if you win some money using this method, but you should never think that it will always work to make money. Otherwise you'll regret about it later because you may lose all what you have with this method when you are unlucky.

I also felt that he doubted his own strategy so he threw the strategy on this forum to see if his strategy could work or not. It was only by trying his strategy that he could figure it out because not many people used that amount of money to bet in one round.

When there is no limit to the money we use, it means we have to be prepared to use very large capital to chase big wins and it is not worth trying for most gamblers. Maybe they can reduce the bet amount for each spin and maybe it can still be tried so they can hope to make a profit. It's better not to try to chase victory because it will cause losses on our part.

The dice game is indeed a gambling game based on luck so by making that strategy, it is hoped that it will work for us and give us the victory we want. But we must remember that in luck-based gambling games, it really requires luck so by making some strategies in playing gambling today it might be possible to win. But don't expect too much from that strategy.

The strategy or method we use in the dice game will not always work for several rounds so if we have several strategies, we can change them after the previous strategy didn't work.

It’s not a good strategy to keep on increasing your bets since 12 times.Because you should learn the strategy to win a game.This is not seems to be a strategy for me.This will multiple the chance of losing huge dollars instead of small bet.We can bet 20$ for 12 times,instead of doubling and tripling of money you made on first bet.The dice is based on the luck,but it can be repeated with the alternate rolling of dice.So you can find the alternate dice and make some dollars from winning.I had a doubt,why you keep on trying for the next bet.You had loss,So you are emotionally weak now.So it’s best way to hold for short period.The market will reflect on the involvement of gambling.When the bet is more,the money you earn will be more compared to the situation of money you earn at less bet.

It is, a game of luck but unlike the other, many people are creating a strategy to be used in dice games and one of it is the strategy proposed by the op. Our luck differs so you can always try it and see if you are more lucky on using this kind of strategy than the strategy that you are using before.

There is no method that works consistently because no gambling sites will survived on that but it does not mean that we should replace our strategy right away because they can still work after some time. It's fine if you have more than one strategy so that you can cycle them once you feel that the other needs a rest. Op already confirm that it's working on him, that is why he is sharing it here but we should test it first with small amounts.

I think this type of strategy is riskier than other strategies. Although it is easy to guess that if someone misses first time, he doubles his second chance to recover his loss. In the same way there is more chance 3rd action. In this way, if you can advance a bit far, how many people are eligible for such a large scale? But one advantage here is that you may not lose over and over again. Once you win in any one, your old loss will be recovered.

In reality you don't need infinite balance because there's really no way to lose 30+ bets in a row because your chances of a loss also get exponentially lower with each lost bet. I've seen people with 15 losses in a row but getting 30 is already almost impossible. Of course to be able to bet 30 times you either need a very low starting bet or a lot of money and with some of the last bets like 25+ you're going to be putting thousands of dollars at stake just to go back to 0 and be able to reset the game which is pretty bad.


I also had 16 losses in a row when I tried to do it. Fortunately, that still made it a small loss, but it emptied my wallet and I didn't feel like sending more just to try again.

Well, it should be noted that yes, it is indeed the Martingale strategy, and if it fails 7 times, in fact one day I did something like this and counted the number of failures and had 18 second losses, this is something that cannot be avoided, sometimes when that happened to me I just went into despair and well sometimes I couldn't continue jugnaod anymore because I was going to compromise all my money balance and that wasn't the idea either. So, in reality, this strategy is not good, because there are also people who do not have a balance of more than $500, so it is very dangerous, I agree that a person who makes this strategy has to have an infinite balance.

This is just one of the strategy of the players if they lose the game they will make a double to make an earning back again and small profit and back to the normal bet this kind of strategy is martingale still theres a lot more but this is the most common people doing.  But this kind of strategy I called as a revenge wage because there's a chance it triple your lose or back your previous bet.

Yes, he should do that. At the same time, though, I doubt he will. If he was so sure of this "strategy", he would use it for his personal gain. 


The Martingale system of betting is an old gambling tactic and, as has been proven countless times, it can't possibly work unless there's no limit to how much you can bet and if you have unlimited funds at your disposal - and neither is ever true. Any gambler who tries to use it to their advantage is going to be on a swift road to financial ruin sooner or later.

So maybe he could give it a try to see if his strategy would work or not. And if his strategy fails, it seems that he needs to update it by modifying his strategy and maybe replacing it with another component.

I can't think of how much money he will spend using his strategy and how much he could lose because there is no certainty in gambling. Hopefully, he can understand the many suggestions from us and not only pursue victory but also think about anticipating the amount of loss he can get later.

Like others said, this is just martingale strategy, it do help gamblers that gamble in casinos, not in sport bet that odds are set in a way you may gamble several times and later won but the betting odds is not in a way that would favour you. But maybe it can be applied appropriately but I have not tried the strategy before on sport gambling because I do not know how it would work successful to let me make profit.

The money you are using it too much for me. As for me, I will just prefer to double the money and nothing more. If I start with $20, the next would be $40 and I can not go more than 5 times which is $320. That amount is still too high for me, I will prefer to start with $1 or $2 instead of $20 so that the game played at the 5th time would not be more than $25.

What if luck is not favouring me, if I am not wrong I went 10 or more times in a row with red so what will happen if I follow the strategy you said. And this is really new the strategy is called martingale and suggested to win the bet million times already but the reality is different the house wins more so you're just taking higher risk with this strategy.

Martingale strategy? You think people haven't thought of this? Lol, sure they have and this is how they lost everything. In the long run, no matter what strategy you use, the casino will always win.

And for your strategy to work, you will need infinite balance or you won't eventually be able to place bets since you will lose everything. And if you had infinite balance, why would you want to gamble?

I experimented with some shibu...millions of shitcoin, best to saying.

In those days for a matter of wager, rather than seeking fortune or money I was trying roulette, then according to my (wrong) analyzes the bet red never failed to appear more than 12 times in a row it was consistentit,so...this is easy!

I decided that applying Martigala would accelerate my wager, in the long run the result of Martigala returns you to the initial bet in the result of your win, nothing happens I told myself, big wager! so I am going to initially bet something that was not compromising, (dont forgot that I used Shibu), I did tests of very safe limits.

I did my calculations and the maximum that my bankroll supported was + 65 million Shibu, that is, with an initial bet of 500 shibu ($0.0055 today), red had to come out at least on spin #18.

So it was simple, no! or if! How is it not going to come out sooner if the average is 12 in the highest value... I started, it worked, I used it for several days, and typical! I made my wager, and without needing it for the objective in question, I told myself one more time, this is working...
Then black!, 16 black... there are about 10 seconds between bets to decide if I bet for the 17th time, but how I had the number 20 as the allin, I thought I have 18, 19 and 20 left, it is impossible that the red one does not come out before... it did not happen.

The red one came out on roulette spin #23, which for number purposes was 262,144,000 Shibu taking a base bet of 500.

There is a term that is used for some players in poker, infinite banking, are these players that play poker as amateur or semi-professional way, it is not that they have an infinite bankroll, it is that their capital is such that based on traditional betting games, given the established limits of blinds, they would never lose their bankroll, there are several celebrities out there, they have losses of $5 -$10 million, the owner of cirque du soleil is one I remember now e.g. then on the opposite side, no matter how good a poker pro player is, he can't bear those losses, they have bankroll limited.

Well, the point, given the Martingale setup, if a millionaire played $500 the initial bet would break him, surely, I hope you understand the point of risk that is "playing" with this technique, it is pure mathematics fighting with the probability, the investor almost always loses, despite...
___

Sinceraly, it is necessary that these user OP appear wanting to proclaim the success of doubling the bet, because it makes you review the concepts and know why not to apply or how to do it correctly.

Your method isn't new, it's called martingale, and if you really think you can't lose 7 consecutive times you are terrible wrong.

I would recommend you to use a dice simulator to see how how you can't win in the long run. A bad streak will always hit you, and that's how dice works, with good streaks and bad streaks.

I remember when i played dice for the first times, i get the idea that i was impossible to lose 6 consecutive times at 95% chance to win, but i learned by the hard way it was possible.

You did not find anything worth mentioning, as stated this method is called martingale and it has probably been around since gambling has been a thing, and as it can be easily implied from this martingale does not work, you state that it is impossible to lose 7 or 12 times in a row but this is not true, this is just unlikely to happen, however the more you do this the greater the chances that it occurs until it becomes a certainty, so stop using martingale before you lose all the money you have at the casino of your preference.

He would definitely be editing or change up those words once he do able to experience the slap of reality.

There's no way on beating up the house(speaking of Dice game). Even if you do win some rolls but to mind off about House edge then you would be still losing in the long run.
Usually these lines are into those people who had just recently experienced wins on dice games or certain games but soon they'll realize
on whats the risk on gambling.

The only thing I see the intention of the post is to make people believe that he's always winning on the strategy he mention and then if someone believes him for what ge say he will ask for additional funds for him to gamble which huge money and gain more profit with that. This is classic form of scamming but I don't think such methods ill even work because we all know the intentions of random people coming here especially when there's money involve in discussions.

Never ceases to amaze me whenever a newbie drops a guide like this as if we are all newbies here, if something like this works in online casinos then it's not gambling anymore, all we need is a huge bankroll then we are a sure winner by doubling it until we regain all that we've loss

How can you've sure have you tried it did it works for you how long have you known this method and who told you that this guide will work

10/10 here are laughing at how you come out with your guide which has been proven by the community as something that will not work and will never work because there is such a thing as a house edge, f you don't now about a house edge that is your assignment go check it out.