How is sale going so far,if you can share that info?
We are still 1 day away from the start of the pre saleWhat will be the bonus for the beginning of the pre sale,and amount of toikens allocated for that?
Topic: [ICO] It's not an idea, it's a BETA product ▐░░VoxelX-The DICOM-Platform░░▌ - page 62. (Read 173416 times)
April 18, 2018, 09:55:43 AM
What will be the bonus for the beginning of the pre sale,and amount of toikens allocated for that?
April 18, 2018, 06:54:30 AM
How is sale going so far,if you can share that info?
We are still 1 day away from the start of the pre saleWhat will be the bonus for the beginning of the pre sale,and amount of toikens allocated for that?
1 ETH = 200,000 GRAY
More bonuses are reserved for large purchases as follows:
>= 50 ETH 3.75%
>= 100 ETH 5%
>= 250 ETH 7.50%
>= 500 ETH 10.00%
April 18, 2018, 06:37:53 AM
Hi Devs, I've got a question for you. What is the target audience of this Project, what is its sphere of implementation? Is it only medicine? For whom this project is designated? Who will be able to get profit from it, instead of radiologists?
April 18, 2018, 06:34:23 AM
How is sale going so far,if you can share that info?
We are still 1 day away from the start of the pre saleWhat will be the bonus for the beginning of the pre sale,and amount of toikens allocated for that?
April 18, 2018, 04:32:44 AM
So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Thanks for the reviewI am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software
But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this
other academic resources like Pubmed are already integrated in the platform
April 18, 2018, 03:57:35 AM
VoxelX got >650 votes on crowdholding!!!
April 18, 2018, 03:49:40 AM
So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Thanks for the reviewI am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software
But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this
Although I have not tried the platform yet, I believe that the upload time of the file should not be taken as a disadvantage as it is still in the BETA stage.
True. And also it can depend on the quality of the image - I would assume they prefer higher quality images.
April 18, 2018, 03:14:13 AM
How is sale going so far,if you can share that info?
We are still 1 day away from the start of the pre sale April 18, 2018, 03:01:26 AM
So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
http://
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Thanks for the reviewI am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
http://
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software
But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this
Although I have not tried the platform yet, I believe that the upload time of the file should not be taken as a disadvantage as it is still in the BETA stage.
True. And also it can depend on the quality of the image - I would assume they prefer higher quality images.
April 18, 2018, 02:57:00 AM
How is sale going so far,if you can share that info?
April 18, 2018, 02:48:35 AM
So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
http://
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Thanks for the reviewI am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
http://
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software
But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this
Although I have not tried the platform yet, I believe that the upload time of the file should not be taken as a disadvantage as it is still in the BETA stage.
April 18, 2018, 02:42:42 AM
So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
This is what I was waiting for, a n00bs guide to the platform. Good work and thank you
this will help a bunch of people on this forum and hopefully, we will get more reviews. April 18, 2018, 01:37:10 AM
So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Thanks for the reviewI am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
Regarding the possible improvements you mentioned in the review:
- Wikipedia is not only the resource to link with but rather there is many other academic resources but unfortunately you don't have the editing permission to see these tools
- There many causes for long time loading - first is because the large files we are dealing with - second because we are in beta and there is a lot of code that need to be rewritten to improve the speed of the software
But I am thankful for this review and you've got our vote and an extra reward for this
April 17, 2018, 10:20:41 PM
So I'm visiting here from Crowdholding and finished playing around with your Beta platform.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
I am a complete noob to the medical field but managed to learn some interesting things!
For example, I learned what the Aortic Arch is. This was made possible by easy links to wikipedia:
Your platform was easy enough for someone like me to use and benefit from.
So that tells me:
- It is intuitive, simple, and very easy to use
- Has a vast amount of information that is easily accessible.
- Has an interactive element to it that can facilitate learning.
Some things that stood out that could be improved:
- I wonder how useful it would be to just have students follow links to Wikipedia? Wouldn't it be better to have more academic links? I suppose the student can find academic references through the wikipedia pages but direct links to scholarly works seems appropriate.
- I'm not sure about the technical side of things, but the platform did seem to take a long time to load between categories. I assume it is because of the large files that you can interact with. If so, and nothing can be done, that is acceptable. However, I imagine a medical student having to cover vast amounts of information at a time. With each page taking 30 sec to a minute to load, that is a lot of wasted time for the student.
Overall, I would say it is a terrific platform, especially when you consider that it is in Beta. You can use this open testing of the platform to attract more investors. It has certainly changed my mind about whether I should consider investing your company.
April 17, 2018, 05:35:26 PM
GRAY Token; The VoxelX Medical Token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
Do you allow users to freely enter data or are there some verifications?
we have said in our white paper that only verified users have the ability to enter data. And the lowest verified user with editing ability is the medical student.
Sorry for dumb question
Can you please explain how does the system verifies users? An individual just need to prove that he is a student of medinine?
With student id or certificate for postgraduate students.
And even if somebody passed the verification all data entry are subjected to a validation which act as an extra filter for the system
Will that slow the whole process down?
I completely agree,when ti comes to something so serious as medicine,and health,you cant be careful enough,so better take your time to do all the needed verifiactions,im sure everyone will understand,and wont have any issues.
I absolutely agree, verification is necessary on such platforms, it is irrelevant whether it will decompile work, the most important thing is to process the data as good as possible.
But what if slowing down will cause that medical staff cant get to the needed info in time.
April 17, 2018, 05:06:53 PM
GRAY Token; The VoxelX Medical Token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
https://steemit-production-imageproxy-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/DQmS1si4vA1wq7Q2BHzB9Krrphjqey61iBrZ5yn1WfBJA6U
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
https://steemit-production-imageproxy-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/DQmS1si4vA1wq7Q2BHzB9Krrphjqey61iBrZ5yn1WfBJA6U
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
Do you allow users to freely enter data or are there some verifications?
we have said in our white paper that only verified users have the ability to enter data. And the lowest verified user with editing ability is the medical student.
Sorry for dumb question
Can you please explain how does the system verifies users? An individual just need to prove that he is a student of medinine?
With student id or certificate for postgraduate students.
And even if somebody passed the verification all data entry are subjected to a validation which act as an extra filter for the system
Will that slow the whole process down?
I completely agree,when ti comes to something so serious as medicine,and health,you cant be careful enough,so better take your time to do all the needed verifiactions,im sure everyone will understand,and wont have any issues.
I absolutely agree, verification is necessary on such platforms, it is irrelevant whether it will decompile work, the most important thing is to process the data as good as possible.
But what if slowing down will cause that medical staff cant get to the needed info in time.
April 17, 2018, 03:56:59 PM
GRAY Token; The VoxelX Medical Token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
https://steemit-production-imageproxy-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/DQmS1si4vA1wq7Q2BHzB9Krrphjqey61iBrZ5yn1WfBJA6U
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
https://steemit-production-imageproxy-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/DQmS1si4vA1wq7Q2BHzB9Krrphjqey61iBrZ5yn1WfBJA6U
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
Do you allow users to freely enter data or are there some verifications?
we have said in our white paper that only verified users have the ability to enter data. And the lowest verified user with editing ability is the medical student.
Sorry for dumb question
Can you please explain how does the system verifies users? An individual just need to prove that he is a student of medinine?
With student id or certificate for postgraduate students.
And even if somebody passed the verification all data entry are subjected to a validation which act as an extra filter for the system
Will that slow the whole process down?
I completely agree,when ti comes to something so serious as medicine,and health,you cant be careful enough,so better take your time to do all the needed verifiactions,im sure everyone will understand,and wont have any issues.
I absolutely agree, verification is necessary on such platforms, it is irrelevant whether it will decompile work, the most important thing is to process the data as good as possible.
April 17, 2018, 02:55:20 PM
GRAY Token; The VoxelX Medical Token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
Do you allow users to freely enter data or are there some verifications?
we have said in our white paper that only verified users have the ability to enter data. And the lowest verified user with editing ability is the medical student.
Sorry for dumb question
Can you please explain how does the system verifies users? An individual just need to prove that he is a student of medinine?
With student id or certificate for postgraduate students.
And even if somebody passed the verification all data entry are subjected to a validation which act as an extra filter for the system
It is good to know that the data on the platform will be additionally verified.
April 17, 2018, 02:48:50 PM
GRAY Token; The VoxelX Medical Token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
https://steemit-production-imageproxy-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/DQmS1si4vA1wq7Q2BHzB9Krrphjqey61iBrZ5yn1WfBJA6U
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
In enhancing the use of radiology learning and studies, as well as sharing and storing of medical images and reports, DICOM platform is introduced by Voxels.
https://steemit-production-imageproxy-upload.s3.amazonaws.com/DQmS1si4vA1wq7Q2BHzB9Krrphjqey61iBrZ5yn1WfBJA6U
The platform enables storing and sharing of medical devices. The DICOM platform is built to encourage medical practitioners in radiology. The platform is built to encourage interaction and education. Users can create their own files for reference purposes as well as for lecturing.
VoxelX token is called GRAY and it is used mainly to finance the building of contents on the DICOM-Platform.
https://steemkr.com/voxelx/@m11/gray-token-the-voxelx-medical-token
Do you allow users to freely enter data or are there some verifications?
we have said in our white paper that only verified users have the ability to enter data. And the lowest verified user with editing ability is the medical student.
Sorry for dumb question
Can you please explain how does the system verifies users? An individual just need to prove that he is a student of medinine?
With student id or certificate for postgraduate students.
And even if somebody passed the verification all data entry are subjected to a validation which act as an extra filter for the system
It is good to know that the data on the platform will be additionally verified.
April 17, 2018, 01:47:27 PM
What will be circulating token supply after ICO is over,and what will be the price per 1 token during ICO,will it be pegged to ETH maybe,since erc20 token?
So what you are saying that if it's pegged to ETH that it will fluctuate as ETH fluctuates?
Exactly,atleast during ICO phase.Some projects even change the ratio eventually,if price of ETH changes drastically,but in most cases they stick to original ratio.I guess all of us that are into crypto have to accept volatility,and risks of that.
1 eth = 200,000 Gray at pre sale
1 eth = 160,000 Gray at public sale
is that good option? what if ETH drastically go up... is that mean GRAY will worth after ICO?
that is logical, so everybody are happy
Jump to: