to me, your explanation seems rather confusing. You still not explained, how exactly you connected Idena coin with any fraud possibility? what is it that sets it apart from more as a possibility of fraud compared to Dogecoin or Litecoin, for example?
On which way of promoting exactly you mean here?
Dogecoin was started by people who specifically wanted to try to pump it even though they admitted 100% that it was a pure marketing game.
Litecoin is just a knockoff of bitcoin with a different algorithm and a faster blocktime more practical for a currency.
Both of those are shitcoins that add nothing useful and definitely nothing worth billions of dollars.
Both of those were released with a very strongly 'decentralized' theme. Nobody knows or cares if their neighbor bought or didn't buy, nobody joins any group to get involved with those currencies etc.
The other side is
Your coin, Idena.
Actually does try to start something which is a big step and very important.
Like moto, huc, neu and some others, a very difficult to solve problem. How do you get human mining without bots overwhelming the system.
Huc tried, failed. Moto tried, failed. Neu tried, failed.
No matter who fails it's still the most important thing that the coin economy shifts from rig mining, you can mine depending how much mining equipment you can afford, to human mining, you can mine according to how much work you want to do. A random person in Botswanaland or some remote country can mine as much as anybody if they want to work at the computer. It doesn't matter if you can afford expensive mining equipment.
So the base of your coin is something that anybody should support.
The problem is the way you try to solve what other coins have not been able to do. You have a sort of centralized system which requires people connect directly to somebody else in the network. If one weak link gets in your network then it can introduce more and more of whatever the weakness you are trying to eliminate by creating a network. Worse, the initial link in the network is an unknown. In crypto so far there have been a high number of anonymous people who have started brilliant projects then disappeared.
So Idena is
1) Following a necessary step in the coin economy
2) But in a way that has been associated with scams in the past
Does that mean it's a scam?
No, it means it might be. There is one or a few people who have the means to cash out the entire Idena economy instantly and fly to Rio if they want. Litecoin and doge are utter shitcoins, but they have no such vulnerability.
The person who started Idena made some very insightful comments about ai, so he or she obviously knows the significance of a coin like this. Why anonymous? It's possible they are 100% sincere and just doing the best anybody can, it's possible they are worried about ending up like Mikhail Sindeyev who started a similar coin outside the control of corporate/government control, it's possible they are a smart person who crafted an elaborate scam, it's possible etc etc etc
I wish the coin well and follow it and prefer it over dogecoin or litecoin, but common sense says be cautious unless and until it decentralizes in such a way that it has more transparency
