Topic: IEO IS WAY BETTER - page 10. (Read 1823 times)
IEO is a right step at the right direction especially at this time that investors are fed up with ICO, but it should never be seen as a hundred percent guarantee that some project will not fail even after passing through IEO process so we must invest with caution.
I like IEO but everyone keeps following the same format. Every exchange transforming into IEO already. So every year new trend set. Last year ICO does failed as now IEO is becoming popular. I hate to say it, but later on people will also complained why the price of the tokens on IEO becoming poor or beyond their brought coins. Take a look on Latoken, some coins in the IEO are now below its ico price. So it depend on the exchange who conduct IEO. If they have reputation more investors will dive but unlike Latoken, forget it. I think they dont screen projects on their exchange as long as those pay them.
Today it seems better than everything before, for example ICO or its derivatives. But there are always problems that cannot be simply solved and solved, I think that there will be the same problems here, so it seems to me that this is an inevitable matter.
yes, im agree with you, project whos doing IEO already partnering with exchanger, even not permanent listed, at least the investor hasnt worry their fund will be lost, because there is guarantee of safeness on exchager itself.
Exchanges will earn their cut in IEO and investor will be still in risk . There is no guarantee that IEO cannot fail or cheat on later stage.
Did not see the exchange listing the scam/worthless coins first and delisting at later stages?
The investor is always in a bad position. No one gives any guarantees. Invest your money at your own risk. Did not see the exchange listing the scam/worthless coins first and delisting at later stages?
IEO is now considered a very popular way to sell tokens of any company which wants to sell its tokens, but some companies cannot afford to spend their IEO on the most popular cryptocurrency exchanges, so ICOs will still live for now.
1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
IEO is just like safe listing. I find ICO projects not true to their words. Did you know Aitheon? Many people invested on that project. That was way last year. And until now, their token hasn't been unlocked yet. They just keep on telling everybody, "We're close in exchange listing" but there's none. With IEO, the exchange who introduce the project surely will list that project.2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
True, and mostly IEO projects are very successful. 
Exchanges will earn their cut in IEO and investor will be still in risk . There is no guarantee that IEO cannot fail or cheat on later stage.
Did not see the exchange listing the scam/worthless coins first and delisting at later stages?
Did not see the exchange listing the scam/worthless coins first and delisting at later stages?
About the original exchange offer (IEO) started talking somehow suddenly and very recently. Therefore, the mechanism of its implementation is incomprehensible. It seems that it differs little from the ICO. I hope that with this form of fundraising from investors, bounty hunter services will be in demand.
You are right as due to big scams in ICO and at the end no keen interest shown in ICO by investors but on main loss will be to bounty hunters, But i personally like this IEO system but only with big exchanges.
some exchanges also do not only large Exchange ieo, but perhaps that many are those who believe the big Exchange. because it might be a little more risk for manipulation of acquisition funds.
You are right IEO seem to be the better choice for investors this days because of the trusty exchanges are bringing to investors ,integrity is what exchanges will be after so they won't dare promote scam projects on there exchanges which is a very good thing
You are right as due to big scams in ICO and at the end no keen interest shown in ICO by investors but on main loss will be to bounty hunters, But i personally like this IEO system but only with big exchanges.
IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons
1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
The concept is good at this point of time, because investing in ICO is now considered unsafe, and it took the ICO date to finish, whereas on IEO the sales could be over within 24 hours, but we'll see after a couple of months if the point you are giving are all still correct.
IEOs are the upgraded ICOs as they are backed by the exchanges and under their supervision. Binance invented this new model and up now it seems to be very successful one and other exchanges started following their example.
We created a chat on the subject of IEO, there we discuss everything that is interesting and can help make a successful IEO. Here is a link if anyone is interested: https://t.me/ieoone
IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons
1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
You say great things. IEO is a really good find for the cryptocurrency market, but you should not forget that the growth of tokens of new projects for IEO is primarily due to the exchanges. They artificially pumped the price. And it is precisely this bad thing that if the exchange stops pumping the price of new projects, then interest in the IEO will drop dramatically.
IEO way better when The exchange behind that IEO is quit big
just like Binance , bittrex , or Huobi
let say about IEO on latoken or yobit it safe for investing but look at previously history its getting worse the price get down when hit market
just like Binance , bittrex , or Huobi
let say about IEO on latoken or yobit it safe for investing but look at previously history its getting worse the price get down when hit market
IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons
1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
the appearance of the IEO is indeed full of pros and cons. but if the IEO can be better than ICO I am very supportive for the advancement of technology and developments in the digital world. this will be very interesting for further investigation. 1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
Your argument is correct, the IEO concept is a good solution to the ICO problem, where many ICOs are currently scamming and making investors reluctant to invest.
Hopefully IEO will be the best solution for ICO
Hopefully IEO will be the best solution for ICO
IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons
1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
IEO is definitely better than ico, because of the security it offers and the exchange will also guarantee the genuity of the product, giving the investors a confidence and also more potential customer. 1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .
2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.
I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you
Jump to: