Pages:
Author

Topic: IEO vs ICO my opinion, tell me yours - page 7. (Read 5169 times)

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 30
December 09, 2019, 11:51:48 PM
I am sure that IEO and ICO are the same. Since 2018, when the ICO movement has lost momentum, the market has gradually become quiet and unattractive as before. Therefore, IEO was born to solve liquidity and attract investors back, but its nature is still ICO + a bit of privacy and security (but I don't think so Grin).

A little more information: IEO is still being abused by HYIP and Ponzi groups in my country. I do not know whether other countries have this kind of situation. But according to what I have seen in my country, IEO is not a safe investment form like what others have promoted.

Exactly ! We can't believe on ICO/IEO we have to do research from our side,
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 30
December 09, 2019, 11:47:54 PM
Well.
i believe we have to do research properly whether it's IEO or ICO,
i have a question for: IEO is Scam free? if it's held on Binance?

i suggest you to do proper Research Before investing in any project,
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
The Decentralized TCP/IP Internet Protocol
December 09, 2019, 11:47:20 PM
I am sure that IEO and ICO are the same. Since 2018, when the ICO movement has lost momentum, the market has gradually become quiet and unattractive as before. Therefore, IEO was born to solve liquidity and attract investors back, but its nature is still ICO + a bit of privacy and security (but I don't think so Grin).

A little more information: IEO is still being abused by HYIP and Ponzi groups in my country. I do not know whether other countries have this kind of situation. But according to what I have seen in my country, IEO is not a safe investment form like what others have promoted.
copper member
Activity: 238
Merit: 1
December 09, 2019, 11:30:34 PM
IEO and ICO have their strength and weekness. IEO gives so much power to the exchange no doubt, who also charge the project exorbitantly and doesn't guarantee that the IEO tokens would be purchased. The issue of IEO arose as a result of the distrust which dominated the cryptocurrency space owing to the increase in scam projects.
hero member
Activity: 1458
Merit: 509
December 09, 2019, 09:30:04 PM
IEO is safer than ICO, but until now ICO still has a record of success. in 2017, it was as if most ICOs had success. but that does not apply to the moment, where there are many fraudulent projects in it and trends are shifting towards safer IEO


It's a little bit safe than ICO but this time IEO goes to the same conclusion as ico caused by so many crap exchange sites are launching the scam IEO and so many investors have been getting scammed by the scam IEO with a lot of pre-mined coin. Both are going to the same thing that ICO and IEO can't 100% be trusted again.
sr. member
Activity: 1002
Merit: 250
December 09, 2019, 09:16:14 PM
I find that all IEO projects have been lauched on major exchanges like Houbi, Binance have brought returns to investors (not buyers or owners, who buy when they open their asset trading), but not with ICO projects. In 2018, we could see a lot of ICO projects being turned into scams after reaching the hard cap, which makes investors afraid of investing and IEO is the key to solving this problem.
So to me, IEO is the best solution to choose investment right now.
copper member
Activity: 280
Merit: 5
December 09, 2019, 08:49:37 PM
Both are almost samething both I prefer IEO to a certain level though especially on some Exchanges but generally ICO and IEO are same set of people and should be monitored because they have done more harm than good.
sr. member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 262
December 09, 2019, 08:05:16 PM
the number of scam ico indications makes investor confidence decreases. ieo came up with a new idea, in my opinion it's good to fix it all. because if it continues to survive like this, it is not impossible ico will be increasingly lost and the difficulty of getting a market in crypto because without the funds, they might not be able to run the project. any situation that should occur in the crypto market should not be a reason and a hindrance for the team to make tokens have value and are profitable.
member
Activity: 812
Merit: 11
December 09, 2019, 07:59:29 PM
IEOs are way forward for more investors and I doubt anyone will prefer to invest in the ICOs anymore. The good projects also try to avoid the ICOs and they choose to invest in the IEO on bigger exchanges. That is a more reliable way of making money through token sales.

Investors will prefer the IEO held by large exchangers because of the price history after the initial listing. IEO might be a good alternative in the sale of tokens but it is not guaranteed that the price will go up after the initial listing because many IEOs are offered by small exchangers, the price drops below the IEO price
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
December 09, 2019, 07:26:59 PM
I think there's bad and there's great ICOs and IEOs. For example MintFlint is an ICO that just secured a listing on Atomars. It is an exchange that has been known for fast listing, secured trading platform, and they only list the best projects. MintFlint has a real use-case and has association with matic. Check out its app.
legendary
Activity: 1006
Merit: 1000
SafeHaven.Finance
December 09, 2019, 06:25:57 PM
IEOs are way forward for more investors and I doubt anyone will prefer to invest in the ICOs anymore. The good projects also try to avoid the ICOs and they choose to invest in the IEO on bigger exchanges. That is a more reliable way of making money through token sales.
sr. member
Activity: 1077
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
December 09, 2019, 03:09:42 PM
The ultimate aim of projects who raise funds via ICO and IEO methods are to raise money to fund their projects and I think projects actually prefers ICOs to IEOs because there would be no middle-man (exchanges) to share the funds with or to give large amounts of their tokens to,
middle-man is needed to reduce scam fund raising. on the other hand, it costs more. but I think it is no problem at all

Quote
additionally during the days of ICOs, projects could raise much more funds via the ICO tokensale method, we used to see hardcaps of $10m and above but with IEOs, their hardcap is much smaller although it's almost guaranteed that they would hit it I'm a short period of time, mostly within seconds of opening the sale.
that's good for IEO, we can know that IEO aims to NOT get funding as much as possible.
IEO has clear calculation how much money needed, and set with it.
full member
Activity: 721
Merit: 100
December 09, 2019, 03:04:25 PM
IEO is very popular lately. Imagine an altcoin because it was released with IEO. This altcoin is born inside the Exchange. In this case, the process starts immediately. People prefer IEOs because of this convenience. Is it easy to join IEO? No, there are many difficulties.
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 251
December 09, 2019, 11:16:12 AM
Thanks for the very rich post and detail analysis about ICO and IEO in my opinion now either it is ICO or IEO the investors only take part in a project which is already stable or supported by another big project. and all other projects never get the support or interest by investors due to large number of scam projects from in IEO and ICO.
ICOs are no more the part of game. They have become the major way for scammers to fool people. With IEOs, things get a bit better when these projects are listed by famous exchanges. Still, there are chances of failure but these don't have scam issue. The safest and most beneficial coins are the one that have been here since the beginning and which actually laid foundation of crypto currency world so naturally they become the first choice.
full member
Activity: 821
Merit: 100
Volare.network
December 09, 2019, 08:17:21 AM
IEO is safer than ICO, but until now ICO still has a record of success. in 2017, it was as if most ICOs had success. but that does not apply to the moment, where there are many fraudulent projects in it and trends are shifting towards safer IEO



IEO is not really safe, scams can still take investor money with the help of bad exchanges. so nothing is safe, if we want to invest in new projects. I think both of them look the same because long before IEO was popular, the initial sale of tokens on exchanges was already there when ICO was still popular and LAtoken was one of those exchanges.
jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 1
December 09, 2019, 07:58:34 AM
IEOs are better than ICOs because the exchange vets the project. Exchange tokens like bnb and ecxx are an even better investment imo.
full member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 100
December 08, 2019, 04:20:52 AM
Thanks for the very rich post and detail analysis about ICO and IEO in my opinion now either it is ICO or IEO the investors only take part in a project which is already stable or supported by another big project. and all other projects never get the support or interest by investors due to large number of scam projects from in IEO and ICO.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 504
WorkAsPro
December 08, 2019, 04:00:13 AM
IEO is safer than ICO, but until now ICO still has a record of success. in 2017, it was as if most ICOs had success. but that does not apply to the moment, where there are many fraudulent projects in it and trends are shifting towards safer IEO

IEO has always received the attention of investors and many people are starting to look for this form of investment to become richer. I think this trend will continue for a few more years because IEO at big exchanges is always mentioned a lot. Personally, I have spent more than 20% of my current assets investing because I believe that IEO is the only way to make money this time around.

Of course, risks can still occur, but there is no need to wait long because IEO will usually have a specific trading day for everyone.
K4C
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 103
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
December 08, 2019, 03:54:00 AM
It all depends on individuals, different people have their different preference but I think that IEOs are generally safer and since the goaal of most investors are to make profit and make it fast, IEOs are preferred because rpojeccts list their tokens in the exchange where they conduct their sales almost immediately after thee sales, no more having to wait for months and sometimes hearts before the token is listed in an exchange and I am yet to see any IEO listed in a major exchange that gave more than 50% loss after it was listed in an exchange, and losses are generally rare, but that is not the case with ICOs, we have seen losses of -500% immediately it's listed in an exchange.
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 502
December 08, 2019, 03:42:02 AM
The ultimate aim of projects who raise funds via ICO and IEO methods are to raise money to fund their projects and I think projects actually prefers ICOs to IEOs because there would be no middle-man (exchanges) to share the funds with or to give large amounts of their tokens to, additionally during the days of ICOs, projects could raise much more funds via the ICO tokensale method, we used to see hardcaps of $10m and above but with IEOs, their hardcap is much smaller although it's almost guaranteed that they would hit it I'm a short period of time, mostly within seconds of opening the sale.
Pages:
Jump to: