IEO vs ICO my opinion, tell me yours - page 7.

AirdropNotifyer

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 30

Quote from: Trela on December 10, 2019, 12:47:20 AM

I am sure that IEO and ICO are the same. Since 2018, when the ICO movement has lost momentum, the market has gradually become quiet and unattractive as before. Therefore, IEO was born to solve liquidity and attract investors back, but its nature is still ICO + a bit of privacy and security (but I don't think so Grin

).

A little more information: IEO is still being abused by HYIP and Ponzi groups in my country. I do not know whether other countries have this kind of situation. But according to what I have seen in my country, IEO is not a safe investment form like what others have promoted.

Exactly ! We can't believe on ICO/IEO we have to do research from our side,

AirdropNotifyer

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 30

Well.
i believe we have to do research properly whether it's IEO or ICO,
i have a question for: IEO is Scam free? if it's held on Binance?

i suggest you to do proper Research Before investing in any project,

Trela

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1001

The Decentralized TCP/IP Internet Protocol

I am sure that IEO and ICO are the same. Since 2018, when the ICO movement has lost momentum, the market has gradually become quiet and unattractive as before. Therefore, IEO was born to solve liquidity and attract investors back, but its nature is still ICO + a bit of privacy and security (but I don't think so Grin

).

A little more information: IEO is still being abused by HYIP and Ponzi groups in my country. I do not know whether other countries have this kind of situation. But according to what I have seen in my country, IEO is not a safe investment form like what others have promoted.

Henrytrust

copper member

Activity: 238

Merit: 1

IEO and ICO have their strength and weekness. IEO gives so much power to the exchange no doubt, who also charge the project exorbitantly and doesn't guarantee that the IEO tokens would be purchased. The issue of IEO arose as a result of the distrust which dominated the cryptocurrency space owing to the increase in scam projects.

Endikadija

hero member

Activity: 1458

Merit: 509

Quote from: awik p on December 08, 2019, 02:19:01 AM

IEO is safer than ICO, but until now ICO still has a record of success. in 2017, it was as if most ICOs had success. but that does not apply to the moment, where there are many fraudulent projects in it and trends are shifting towards safer IEO

It's a little bit safe than ICO but this time IEO goes to the same conclusion as ico caused by so many crap exchange sites are launching the scam IEO and so many investors have been getting scammed by the scam IEO with a lot of pre-mined coin. Both are going to the same thing that ICO and IEO can't 100% be trusted again.

Itsmylife

sr. member

Activity: 1002

Merit: 250

I find that all IEO projects have been lauched on major exchanges like Houbi, Binance have brought returns to investors (not buyers or owners, who buy when they open their asset trading), but not with ICO projects. In 2018, we could see a lot of ICO projects being turned into scams after reaching the hard cap, which makes investors afraid of investing and IEO is the key to solving this problem.
So to me, IEO is the best solution to choose investment right now.

Firefoxx

copper member

Activity: 280

Merit: 5

Both are almost samething both I prefer IEO to a certain level though especially on some Exchanges but generally ICO and IEO are same set of people and should be monitored because they have done more harm than good.

fuer44

sr. member

Activity: 1652

Merit: 262

SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM

the number of scam ico indications makes investor confidence decreases. ieo came up with a new idea, in my opinion it's good to fix it all. because if it continues to survive like this, it is not impossible ico will be increasingly lost and the difficulty of getting a market in crypto because without the funds, they might not be able to run the project. any situation that should occur in the crypto market should not be a reason and a hindrance for the team to make tokens have value and are profitable.

setialovers

member

Activity: 812

Merit: 11

Quote from: pcfli on December 09, 2019, 07:25:57 PM

IEOs are way forward for more investors and I doubt anyone will prefer to invest in the ICOs anymore. The good projects also try to avoid the ICOs and they choose to invest in the IEO on bigger exchanges. That is a more reliable way of making money through token sales.

Investors will prefer the IEO held by large exchangers because of the price history after the initial listing. IEO might be a good alternative in the sale of tokens but it is not guaranteed that the price will go up after the initial listing because many IEOs are offered by small exchangers, the price drops below the IEO price

yoshiokanetsuna

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

I think there's bad and there's great ICOs and IEOs. For example MintFlint is an ICO that just secured a listing on Atomars. It is an exchange that has been known for fast listing, secured trading platform, and they only list the best projects. MintFlint has a real use-case and has association with matic. Check out its app.

pcfli

legendary

Activity: 1006

Merit: 1000

SafeHaven.Finance

IEOs are way forward for more investors and I doubt anyone will prefer to invest in the ICOs anymore. The good projects also try to avoid the ICOs and they choose to invest in the IEO on bigger exchanges. That is a more reliable way of making money through token sales.

biddicoin

sr. member

Activity: 1077

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: pant-79 on December 08, 2019, 04:42:02 AM

The ultimate aim of projects who raise funds via ICO and IEO methods are to raise money to fund their projects and I think projects actually prefers ICOs to IEOs because there would be no middle-man (exchanges) to share the funds with or to give large amounts of their tokens to,

middle-man is needed to reduce scam fund raising. on the other hand, it costs more. but I think it is no problem at all

Quote

additionally during the days of ICOs, projects could raise much more funds via the ICO tokensale method, we used to see hardcaps of $10m and above but with IEOs, their hardcap is much smaller although it's almost guaranteed that they would hit it I'm a short period of time, mostly within seconds of opening the sale.

that's good for IEO, we can know that IEO aims to NOT get funding as much as possible.
IEO has clear calculation how much money needed, and set with it.

jameshugo17

full member

Activity: 721

Merit: 100

IEO is very popular lately. Imagine an altcoin because it was released with IEO. This altcoin is born inside the Exchange. In this case, the process starts immediately. People prefer IEOs because of this convenience. Is it easy to join IEO? No, there are many difficulties.

Kevondo

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 251

Quote from: shaheer001 on December 08, 2019, 05:20:52 AM

Thanks for the very rich post and detail analysis about ICO and IEO in my opinion now either it is ICO or IEO the investors only take part in a project which is already stable or supported by another big project. and all other projects never get the support or interest by investors due to large number of scam projects from in IEO and ICO.

ICOs are no more the part of game. They have become the major way for scammers to fool people. With IEOs, things get a bit better when these projects are listed by famous exchanges. Still, there are chances of failure but these don't have scam issue. The safest and most beneficial coins are the one that have been here since the beginning and which actually laid foundation of crypto currency world so naturally they become the first choice.

Nivia1st

full member

Activity: 821

Merit: 100

Volare.network

Quote from: awik p on December 08, 2019, 02:19:01 AM

IEO is safer than ICO, but until now ICO still has a record of success. in 2017, it was as if most ICOs had success. but that does not apply to the moment, where there are many fraudulent projects in it and trends are shifting towards safer IEO

IEO is not really safe, scams can still take investor money with the help of bad exchanges. so nothing is safe, if we want to invest in new projects. I think both of them look the same because long before IEO was popular, the initial sale of tokens on exchanges was already there when ICO was still popular and LAtoken was one of those exchanges.

RussiaUkraineTranslation

jr. member

Activity: 224

Merit: 1

IEOs are better than ICOs because the exchange vets the project. Exchange tokens like bnb and ecxx are an even better investment imo.

shaheer001

full member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 100

Thanks for the very rich post and detail analysis about ICO and IEO in my opinion now either it is ICO or IEO the investors only take part in a project which is already stable or supported by another big project. and all other projects never get the support or interest by investors due to large number of scam projects from in IEO and ICO.

alan2here

hero member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 504

WorkAsPro

Quote from: awik p on December 08, 2019, 02:19:01 AM

IEO is safer than ICO, but until now ICO still has a record of success. in 2017, it was as if most ICOs had success. but that does not apply to the moment, where there are many fraudulent projects in it and trends are shifting towards safer IEO

IEO has always received the attention of investors and many people are starting to look for this form of investment to become richer. I think this trend will continue for a few more years because IEO at big exchanges is always mentioned a lot. Personally, I have spent more than 20% of my current assets investing because I believe that IEO is the only way to make money this time around.

Of course, risks can still occur, but there is no need to wait long because IEO will usually have a specific trading day for everyone.

K4C

full member

Activity: 448

Merit: 103

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

It all depends on individuals, different people have their different preference but I think that IEOs are generally safer and since the goaal of most investors are to make profit and make it fast, IEOs are preferred because rpojeccts list their tokens in the exchange where they conduct their sales almost immediately after thee sales, no more having to wait for months and sometimes hearts before the token is listed in an exchange and I am yet to see any IEO listed in a major exchange that gave more than 50% loss after it was listed in an exchange, and losses are generally rare, but that is not the case with ICOs, we have seen losses of -500% immediately it's listed in an exchange.

pant-79

hero member

Activity: 994

Merit: 502

The ultimate aim of projects who raise funds via ICO and IEO methods are to raise money to fund their projects and I think projects actually prefers ICOs to IEOs because there would be no middle-man (exchanges) to share the funds with or to give large amounts of their tokens to, additionally during the days of ICOs, projects could raise much more funds via the ICO tokensale method, we used to see hardcaps of $10m and above but with IEOs, their hardcap is much smaller although it's almost guaranteed that they would hit it I'm a short period of time, mostly within seconds of opening the sale.

Topic: IEO vs ICO my opinion, tell me yours - page 7. (Read 5118 times)