For me I think ieos are doing the respective task expected of it.
From binance to other exchanges we have seen project attain softcap and also 3x their ieo price after listing.
So far, ieo has been a good source and option of crowdfunding
Topic: IEOS are no different from ICO tricks; just an upgrade (Read 11713 times)
IEO is quite different from ICOs cause the exchange will help raise funds for the project for even a shorter while. ICOs can run for weeks or even months while some IEOs lasts for few minutes or so. Some Projects meets hardcap within few minutes in top ranking exchanges after launing IEO.
it is true that ICO and IEO are the same as Innitialing Coin which only distinguishes the person or company that handles it.
if the IEO will be handled by an exchange and ICO directly from the owner that allows fraud.
it just using different scheme in crowdfunding.the differences only on exchanges that held crowdfunding.in IEO, developers team directly sell their tokens/coins in market so exchanges as if as escrow in this part.if the IEO will be handled by an exchange and ICO directly from the owner that allows fraud.
An IEO is just safer for the investors because they can dump their coins immediately after the IEO offering. For a regular ICO it can take ages and usually it just ends up on a low volume exchange at best, or in many cases on forkdelta with no buy orders
I also think there is no such thing as the IEO and ICO. Indeed, only different ways of selling. All the same, it needs a certain process. Maybe IEO has a little more profit because they are after sales, of course, very fast for listings in the market. Maybe that's what distinguishes the IEO and ICO.
You view's for you.. Personally from this end, I can see a huge difference between IEO and ICO. For instance, most projects that conduct IEOS on several exchanges often times list right away on the designated exchange (s) used during IEO, offering every investors to start trading right away. some ICOs till date never got to the listing stage before they went on dead slumber which they may never eake up from.
I do not agree. They are different from each other, ICOs had its time and from those times we all know how investors were treated; that is most investors do not even get their tokens owing to the way the ICO was arranged. Even some after ICO still go ahead to swap giving unnecessary excuses. The last but not the least is, most ICOs scammed a lot of investors.
But today, taking a glance at IEOs, as you are investing you are getting your token ASAP (trading) thus no room for unforeseen circumstances or scam.
In my own opinion, IEOs are better as it will reduce the rate of fraudulent activities in terms of public sale offerings.
But today, taking a glance at IEOs, as you are investing you are getting your token ASAP (trading) thus no room for unforeseen circumstances or scam.
In my own opinion, IEOs are better as it will reduce the rate of fraudulent activities in terms of public sale offerings.
No I think they really different from each other. In ICOs we just research about the team and make our investments, who then delivers or exit scam. While in IEOs the exchange makes the research to authenticate the team and what they are offering before accepting them, so investors just invest at ease.
I think we're most get it wrong is by assuming that once a major exchange promotes an IEO then they will make huge profits, while forgetting there are market factors which also affects IEOs.
I think we're most get it wrong is by assuming that once a major exchange promotes an IEO then they will make huge profits, while forgetting there are market factors which also affects IEOs.
IEOs are quite different from ICOs . The project get to sold on an exchange which gives the project a bigger chance, let's look at binance launchpad for instance, project who launches on binance have an high rate of being successful, but ICOs ends up not listing to an exchange or even end up having a shitty prices.
I do not think that holding IEOs will not give 100 percent guarantee that a project will be listed on exchanges thereafter. One thing is that it will only increase changes of exchange listing. There are reports that those projects launching IEOs are still running away scamming investors or are being dumped for want of enough funds to continue the project. So IEOs are relatively good than ICOs.
IEO is a new trend, but I only really believe in IEOs on big exchange like Binance, Houbi, and small exchange. IEOs are not really successful, even the Bittrex IEOs are considered to be failures.
it is true that ICO and IEO are the same as Innitialing Coin which only distinguishes the person or company that handles it.
if the IEO will be handled by an exchange and ICO directly from the owner that allows fraud.
it just using different scheme in crowdfunding.the differences only on exchanges that held crowdfunding.in IEO, developers team directly sell their tokens/coins in market so exchanges as if as escrow in this part. if the IEO will be handled by an exchange and ICO directly from the owner that allows fraud.
it is true that ICO and IEO are the same as Innitialing Coin which only distinguishes the person or company that handles it.
if the IEO will be handled by an exchange and ICO directly from the owner that allows fraud.
if the IEO will be handled by an exchange and ICO directly from the owner that allows fraud.
People should know that there will be scam IEOs as well ,there will be projects using IEO to lure victims and that projects IEO might never happen,my advice is for all investors to do better research of any project before investing
If the IEOs are scam, exchangers should be responsible to their members. Exchangers should be know about the project or developers team and project roadmap. I am believe exchanger will carefully before held IEOs on their platform
People should know that there will be scam IEOs as well ,there will be projects using IEO to lure victims and that projects IEO might never happen,my advice is for all investors to do better research of any project before investing
You know, it is even easier to attract people to IEo, people don't even analyze it, they invest in each project, because of IEO tendency.
That's why you should be careful
At least, you don't need to worry that tokens you buy is listed on exchange site or not? The IEOs token always have value. If you have enough smart, good TA you always make profit whatever the IEOs project success or not. That's why you should be careful
Let me start by saying both are different.
Secondly, can you compare Binance with Latoken? I guess not. Then what's the reason? In my own opinion, everyone has seen the potential of Binance team and their aim of making sure they offer amazing services while improving everyday. How about Latoken? Can such be said about the team.
IEOs might have a huge chance of selling out on major exchanges because they have what it takes to promote such IEOs. Also, a successful IEOs doesn't mean a successful project on the long run, so we should always endeavour to make our research first.
Secondly, can you compare Binance with Latoken? I guess not. Then what's the reason? In my own opinion, everyone has seen the potential of Binance team and their aim of making sure they offer amazing services while improving everyday. How about Latoken? Can such be said about the team.
IEOs might have a huge chance of selling out on major exchanges because they have what it takes to promote such IEOs. Also, a successful IEOs doesn't mean a successful project on the long run, so we should always endeavour to make our research first.
You know, it is even easier to attract people to IEo, people don't even analyze it, they invest in each project, because of IEO tendency.
That's why you should be careful
That's why you should be careful
IEOs are indeed an upgrade version of ICOs but there is some amount of differences between ICOs and IEOs. with IEOs, a third party is involve in the sales of the coins or tokens and this third party is given the total control over the amount of tokens or coins to be sold during the crowdfund. This means that the third party ensures that the project is not a scam to just steal money from investors. This is the major significant difference of IEOs from ICOs.
No they are indeed different. In IEOs, investors or users don't pay directly to the team as the exchange takes care of everything.
But one thing is worthy of recognition, which is; that a major exchange is promoting an IEO do not mean it might last long term or that the team is capable of offering all within the whitepaper. This aspect of due diligence is left to the investors.
But one thing is worthy of recognition, which is; that a major exchange is promoting an IEO do not mean it might last long term or that the team is capable of offering all within the whitepaper. This aspect of due diligence is left to the investors.
Jump to: