Pages:
Author

Topic: "If you were the President of the DGC Foundation, what would be your next step?" - page 2. (Read 6316 times)

sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250
This DoSing that cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
seems the community round this coin thinks if baritus isn't around all is good, baritus around all is bad..........when seriously people you're flogging a dead horse.

the core of DGC was full of rotten apples, ddos anyone in their way then anyone who said hey this community doesn't roll like that, baritus was probably the best of them.

now you guys are just backstabbing your founder and lead dev just to get another round out of this trash.

move on DGC won't amount to anything.




Good assessment. You thought this out very well when replying.

No one is backstabbing anyone.

Who is this "core full of rotten apples" ?

The foundation team has basically been around since the beginning of Digitalcoin. I'd love to know who you consider a rotten apple.

Also it's very hard to properly follow what you are saying the way you wrote it......I grade your paper a D- for lack of effort.

much higher grade then i rate your coin, or your lame PR.

let me break it down for you;

if your coin rises at any time by any significant amounts I dump it back down.

why? because attacks members of your community did (which may have cost more then the total of you pathetic market cap is).


What the ever living hell are you talking about?

According to my email I just won 1.24 million in Africa. You sent me that email phishing for my bank information. It was you.

Show proof or btfo.

show you proof of what?
sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250
seems the community round this coin thinks if baritus isn't around all is good, baritus around all is bad..........when seriously people you're flogging a dead horse.

the core of DGC was full of rotten apples, ddos anyone in their way then anyone who said hey this community doesn't roll like that, baritus was probably the best of them.

now you guys are just backstabbing your founder and lead dev just to get another round out of this trash.

move on DGC won't amount to anything.




Good assessment. You thought this out very well when replying.

No one is backstabbing anyone.

Who is this "core full of rotten apples" ?

The foundation team has basically been around since the beginning of Digitalcoin. I'd love to know who you consider a rotten apple.

Also it's very hard to properly follow what you are saying the way you wrote it......I grade your paper a D- for lack of effort.

much higher grade then i rate your coin, or your lame PR.

let me break it down for you;

if your coin rises at any time by any significant amounts I dump it back down.

why? because attacks members of your community did (which may have cost more then the total of you pathetic market cap is).


What the ever living hell are you talking about?

According to my email I just won 1.24 million in Africa. You sent me that email phishing for my bank information. It was you.

Show proof or btfo.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
seems the community round this coin thinks if baritus isn't around all is good, baritus around all is bad..........when seriously people you're flogging a dead horse.

the core of DGC was full of rotten apples, ddos anyone in their way then anyone who said hey this community doesn't roll like that, baritus was probably the best of them.

now you guys are just backstabbing your founder and lead dev just to get another round out of this trash.

move on DGC won't amount to anything.




Good assessment. You thought this out very well when replying.

No one is backstabbing anyone.

Who is this "core full of rotten apples" ?

The foundation team has basically been around since the beginning of Digitalcoin. I'd love to know who you consider a rotten apple.

Also it's very hard to properly follow what you are saying the way you wrote it......I grade your paper a D- for lack of effort.

much higher grade then i rate your coin, or your lame PR.

let me break it down for you;

if your coin rises at any time by any significant amounts I dump it back down.

why? because attacks members of your community did (which may have cost more then the total of DGC's pathetic market cap is).
sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250
seems the community round this coin thinks if baritus isn't around all is good, baritus around all is bad..........when seriously people you're flogging a dead horse.

the core of DGC was full of rotten apples, ddos anyone in their way then anyone who said hey this community doesn't roll like that, baritus was probably the best of them.

now you guys are just backstabbing your founder and lead dev just to get another round out of this trash.

move on DGC won't amount to anything.




Good assessment. You thought this out very well when replying.

No one is backstabbing anyone.

Who is this "core full of rotten apples" ?

The foundation team has basically been around since the beginning of Digitalcoin. I'd love to know who you consider a rotten apple.

Also it's very hard to properly follow what you are saying the way you wrote it......I grade your paper a D- for lack of effort.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
seems the community round this coin thinks if baritus isn't around all is good, baritus around all is bad..........when seriously people you're flogging a dead horse.

the core of DGC was full of rotten apples, ddos anyone in their way then anyone who said hey this community doesn't roll like that, baritus was probably the best of them.

now you guys are just backstabbing your founder and lead dev just to get another round out of this trash.

move on DGC won't amount to anything.


hero member
Activity: 1361
Merit: 506
Digitalcoin has a great community including some fantastic devs doing some excellent work. I'm also appreciative for the hard work Kenel is doing as president and its good to see an open and fair minded discussion opened up in this thread.

I'm another person holding a number of CAve shares as well. No idea if I'll see any return from them or not but to be honest I'm just over it and looking to move forward with DGC. Like Ahmed and Kenel have said Baritus is no longer involved and hasn't been around for quite a while. Looking forward to this new direction now with Digitalcoin and hoping it becomes the success it deserves to be in the future.
sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250
If the purpose of this thread was to start another pointless discussion about Baritus, mission accomplished.

If the purpose was to get some ideas rearning what needs done, update your websites.

Day in and day out incredible accomplishments (as many have touched on in this thread) are barely mentioned and don't even make it to the sadly static Digitalcoin and Digitalcoin Foundation websites.

The wiki is very nice thanks to SimonTower, but everything else is really out of date.

http://digitalcoin.co/services.php
http://digitalcoin.foundation/projects/
http://digitalcoin.foundation/news/

This is what people first see when they start looking into Digitalcoin, and it doesn't make for a good first impression.

Also, if you must lock down the forum, you should make it a little more clear what you're asking people to do, and you should remember that most people don't even know what irc is.

TT


My purpose wasn't to derail the thread, I was just genuinely curious as to whether baritus was still on the development team or not. I have not even bothered to do any research into DGC until I happened across this thread and it piqued my curiosity. I don't like to keep all my eggs in one basket so it is nice to check things out.

I appreciate you giving DGC a second look. I sincerely urge everyone to do the same.

Our foundation is very open to ideas from our community. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
If the purpose of this thread was to start another pointless discussion about Baritus, mission accomplished.

If the purpose was to get some ideas rearning what needs done, update your websites.

Day in and day out incredible accomplishments (as many have touched on in this thread) are barely mentioned and don't even make it to the sadly static Digitalcoin and Digitalcoin Foundation websites.

The wiki is very nice thanks to SimonTower, but everything else is really out of date.

http://digitalcoin.co/services.php
http://digitalcoin.foundation/projects/
http://digitalcoin.foundation/news/

This is what people first see when they start looking into Digitalcoin, and it doesn't make for a good first impression.

Also, if you must lock down the forum, you should make it a little more clear what you're asking people to do, and you should remember that most people don't even know what irc is.

TT


My purpose wasn't to derail the thread, I was just genuinely curious as to whether baritus was still on the development team or not. I have not even bothered to do any research into DGC until I happened across this thread and it piqued my curiosity. I don't like to keep all my eggs in one basket so it is nice to check things out.
sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250
If the purpose of this thread was to start another pointless discussion about Baritus, mission accomplished.

If the purpose was to get some ideas rearning what needs done, update your websites.

Day in and day out incredible accomplishments (as many have touched on in this thread) are barely mentioned and don't even make it to the sadly static Digitalcoin and Digitalcoin Foundation websites.

The wiki is very nice thanks to SimonTower, but everything else is really out of date.

http://digitalcoin.co/services.php
http://digitalcoin.foundation/projects/
http://digitalcoin.foundation/news/

This is what people first see when they start looking into Digitalcoin, and it doesn't make for a good first impression.

Also, if you must lock down the forum, you should make it a little more clear what you're asking people to do, and you should remember that most people don't even know what irc is.

TT

Hang onto your fur.....we're going to pop into lightspeed.

All these things are currently under development, one of them will be ready shortly.

hero member
Activity: 500
Merit: 501
http://digitalcoin.org/
If the purpose of this thread was to start another pointless discussion about Baritus, mission accomplished.

If the purpose was to get some ideas rearning what needs done, update your websites.

Day in and day out incredible accomplishments (as many have touched on in this thread) are barely mentioned and don't even make it to the sadly static Digitalcoin and Digitalcoin Foundation websites.

The wiki is very nice thanks to SimonTower, but everything else is really out of date.

http://digitalcoin.co/services.php
http://digitalcoin.foundation/projects/
http://digitalcoin.foundation/news/

This is what people first see when they start looking into Digitalcoin, and it doesn't make for a good first impression.

Also, if you must lock down the forum, you should make it a little more clear what you're asking people to do, and you should remember that most people don't even know what irc is.

TT
hero member
Activity: 729
Merit: 502

I couldn't agree more. I know this will remain a hotly debated subject for some time to come, but the facts are far too compelling. And just way too convenient.



Hotly debated?

Well it seems the tide has changed in the 1.5+ years I have been out of touch here.  Cheesy

cosmoo seems to be his only staunch supporter left. I will drop into irc one afternoon and check out the pulse on your project. DGC was probably the first alt outside of namecoin I ever owned.



it's not that i want to support him, just to me the facts point to him being a lousy entrepreneur, not a scammer. i've lost money to legit scams and the feeling is different here.

i acknowledge i'm a minority and probably won't change anyone's opinion, whatever, we're all entitled to one. i'd just prefer it if the progenitor of the coin we're trying to support wasn't labelled as a criminal. shitty entrepreneur honestly seems more accurate to me and doesn't carry the pure, negative impact trolls like BCX get paid to spread.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000

I couldn't agree more. I know this will remain a hotly debated subject for some time to come, but the facts are far too compelling. And just way too convenient.



Hotly debated?

Well it seems the tide has changed in the 1.5+ years I have been out of touch here.  Cheesy

cosmoo seems to be his only staunch supporter left. I will drop into irc one afternoon and check out the pulse on your project. DGC was probably the first alt outside of namecoin I ever owned.

sr. member
Activity: 578
Merit: 250

I couldn't agree more. I know this will remain a hotly debated subject for some time to come, but the facts are far too compelling. And just way too convenient.



Hotly debated?
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange.

So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story?
~BCX~

Okay, i seem to be the only person who cares about being rational and doesn't think baritus is a scammer (and yes, i lost dgc to cryptoave), SO i think that only adds to the credibility when i say he is NOT involved with DGC development. in fact I pm'd him about a week ago asking him to delete his old github and haven't gotten a reply yet. coming from probably the only person who ever defended him, i'll repeat he hasn't been involved with development whatsoever. DGC v3 is entirely new codebase implemented by Ahmed. so cool your shit bcx.

really, i'd rather the original dev of DGC be known as a poor entrepreneur, rather than an outright scammer. the DGC he solicited for his exchange project came from willing investors, not from rigging the DGC network. if you're gonna spread shit, at least spread accurate shit. also, the amount of DGC he solicited was roughly 550k total, about the same amount dumped, so i don't believe there's any more coins left to dump, as if that even matters since his holdings, along with all other DGC ever distributed, were gained legally. people just want a public figure to roast when their investment in an overhyped environment turns sour. that's all conversations about him have ever been about.

let's just forget about the guy and move on. the DGC network is clean, that is all that ever mattered and is the only thing worth discussing here.

Yea were not going to agree there. Xawksaw, samson, techbytes and kenel helped in the creation of DGC V3. Baritus in my personal opinion is an outright scammer. No one in their right minds would say he isnt. Everyone lost a shit ton of DGC in cryptoave. That money was not gained legally at all. He claimed it was for CryptoAve an exchange that would be launched for DGC which barely stayed online at all. Its a non-existant service. So it is a scam.

Also DGC was not overhyped at all. Infact the money that people gave towards the marketing of cryptoave and DGC. Which never happened. DGC was one of the most under marketed coins at a time that was critical for DGC.

Ahmed

I couldn't agree more. I know this will remain a hotly debated subject for some time to come, but the facts are far too compelling. And just way too convenient.

hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange.

So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story?
~BCX~

Okay, i seem to be the only person who cares about being rational and doesn't think baritus is a scammer (and yes, i lost dgc to cryptoave), SO i think that only adds to the credibility when i say he is NOT involved with DGC development. in fact I pm'd him about a week ago asking him to delete his old github and haven't gotten a reply yet. coming from probably the only person who ever defended him, i'll repeat he hasn't been involved with development whatsoever. DGC v3 is entirely new codebase implemented by Ahmed. so cool your shit bcx.

really, i'd rather the original dev of DGC be known as a poor entrepreneur, rather than an outright scammer. the DGC he solicited for his exchange project came from willing investors, not from rigging the DGC network. if you're gonna spread shit, at least spread accurate shit. also, the amount of DGC he solicited was roughly 550k total, about the same amount dumped, so i don't believe there's any more coins left to dump, as if that even matters since his holdings, along with all other DGC ever distributed, were gained legally. people just want a public figure to roast when their investment in an overhyped environment turns sour. that's all conversations about him have ever been about.

let's just forget about the guy and move on. the DGC network is clean, that is all that ever mattered and is the only thing worth discussing here.

Yea were not going to agree there. Xawksaw, samson, techbytes and kenel helped in the creation of DGC V3. Baritus in my personal opinion is an outright scammer. No one in their right minds would say he isnt. Everyone lost a shit ton of DGC in cryptoave. That money was not gained legally at all. He claimed it was for CryptoAve an exchange that would be launched for DGC which barely stayed online at all. Its a non-existant service. So it is a scam.

Also DGC was not overhyped at all. Infact the money that people gave towards the marketing of cryptoave and DGC. Which never happened. DGC was one of the most under marketed coins at a time that was critical for DGC.

Ahmed
hero member
Activity: 729
Merit: 502
The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange.

So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story?
~BCX~

Okay, i seem to be the only person who cares about being rational and doesn't think baritus is a scammer (and yes, i lost dgc to cryptoave), SO i think that only adds to the credibility when i say he is NOT involved with DGC development. in fact I pm'd him about a week ago asking him to delete his old github and haven't gotten a reply yet. coming from probably the only person who ever defended him, i'll repeat he hasn't been involved with development whatsoever. DGC v3 is entirely new codebase implemented by Ahmed. so cool your shit bcx.

really, i'd rather the original dev of DGC be known as a poor entrepreneur, rather than an outright scammer. the DGC he solicited for his exchange project came from willing investors, not from rigging the DGC network. if you're gonna spread shit, at least spread accurate shit. also, the amount of DGC he solicited was roughly 550k total, about the same amount dumped, so i don't believe there's any more coins left to dump, as if that even matters since his holdings, along with all other DGC ever distributed, were gained legally. people just want a public figure to roast when their investment in an overhyped environment turns sour. that's all conversations about him have ever been about.

let's just forget about the guy and move on. the DGC network is clean, that is all that ever mattered and is the only thing worth discussing here.
hero member
Activity: 800
Merit: 1000
Do you know tenebrix, fairbrix? Tonal bitcoin? those were the starter alts..lack of everything left them dead and buried.

Not too up to date on the alt history are you?

Tenebrix and Fairbrix died because I personally exterminated them along with a few of the other early alts that were pieces of shit. In all fairness TBX and FBX were prototype coins and I was asked by the devs to stress them. They were the forerunners of Litecoin.

Back on topic.

The title of the thread is "If you were the President of the DGC Foundation, what would be your next step"

There seems to be a real concern by people about Baritus still being involved. Count me in as one of those people and as I am sure Ahmed can tell you, having experienced first hand that I can be a significant barrier to any coin I desire to be.

What would convince me is that if kenel or the DGC Foundation publicly and clearly stated that Baritus is not involved in any manner, never will be and more than likely stole the $30K of DGC, I would consider the matter closed. The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange.

So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story?


~BCX~

Baritus wont ever be involved in DGC and its development EVER. (Atleast not while i'm around). My own personal opinion (not from the foundation or kenel) is that baritus most likely dumped the DGC himself rather than an employee. (No exchange operator is dumb enough to leave their wallet unsecured on a device which other people have access to).

now doesn't that just leave yet another with a big stash to dump anytime dgc moves forward?
i'm not that heavily invested in DGC. I own maybe 40k and considering ive stuck with DGC since the beginning. I doubt  i'd ever dump it even if its worthless (You couldnt count the number of worthless coins i hold)
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
now doesn't that just leave yet another with a big stash to dump anytime dgc moves forward?

I don't understand the issue here ?

Are you complaining that some people have lots of coins and might dump them if the price goes up ?

not at all, seeing I'm one of the ones with a large holding that does suppress the price when it goes up.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
Just hopped on here for the first time this year... I'm pleasantly surprised to see that DGC still has a following. Keep at it man!


Welcome back?  Good to see your first post is here with DGC...  Smiley

We are still in irc if you want to swing by.



-tb-
Pages:
Jump to: