not as interesting as some of the fake positive trust you have given yourself?
also, what did you have to give for ocminer to remove his neg?
I'm pretty sure that Lottery Tickets is one of his alts..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lottery-tickets-149949So... when did this cryptsy insider, shitcoin pushing carpet cleaner become a crap cloning dev ? lol
Thanks. We've been around for over 3 years now, so things are going well. Just wanted to jump in to help FTC get around as much as we could.
(After cleaning carpet for several years, I also have hardwood now too lol carpet is the last thing I want to see when I get home)
It definitely is
I'm not ashamed to have run successful companies in multiple industries, it's not an insult to me at all. Unlike most people here, I know the actual value of a dollar thanks to years of hard, physical labor. And just to be clear, I wasn't actually scrubbing rugs, I owned the whole company..
Don't even get me started on Cryptsy.. the whole reason they are mad at me is because of what I've said about how they operate; I really have nothing nice to say about them in the slightest
"It definitely is", what ?
Please do not mistake my over descripitveness for an insult. I respect hard work and the entrepreneurial spirit. Its the ponzi shitcoin pushers that bring out the troll in me.
I'm just trying to figure out if you're like muddafudda (someone who learned how to clone coins by changing the most basic parameters) or one of his candygirls.
I definitely posted TIX, but I did not make it, which is, coincidentally, the last of 'my' coins to make it to your favorite exchange listed above. Mudda's new coin, which is NAMED CON, is now there, so keep me out of that shithole as a comparison, please. I have come a long way in the last few years as far as technical skills and do all coin-related things myself now. Other people put up services, I work on the coins until it either a) no longer needs my support, or b) breaks, and is basically unfixable with newly discovered flaws in the codebase, a la BUCKS. I am not hiding the fact that it was broken at all. They broke it and when I was looking at how to fix it, I found far more serious shit that could be done. I put the decision to swap back to a PPC-based chain I was comfortable with to continue to support it. This vote was unanimously NO, the group set up to make coin decisions decided to find someone else to try fixing it and failed to come up with that person. None of this is a secret
Every one of my coins is very, very different and unique. I very much emphasize everything I do is using specs to stress test the blockchain. NEG, in particular, is extreme in speed and verifying prime numbers to give bonuses. You can hate me all you want, but you will never find me shilling my coins or begging people to buy, I do not care what the price is, I simply worry about performance
To use every idea I have in a single coin and fork the shit out of it once every few months is a fucking insane thing to expect from someone. I lost over 30 BTC on BUCKS (the coine alone, not to mention services, servers, and sites);
I ate the red more than anyone else in the entire world, so I can understand the frustration
In the end, I consider BUCKS technically successful; the entire point is to find flaws with coins and blockchains. It exposed several issues that were previously unknown, and most still are since I'm not going to tell people how to break shit, which is the entire point of testing. PPC-based chains operate much smoother, and I will continue to use those and modify them to be up to par, rather than using the new generation garbage. This is why the guide I posted uses this as the base