and here they are folks, arguing over made up scenarios and fake or poorly thought out statistics blatantly designed to help one side or the other.
Way to piss off both myrkul and augustocroppo
When I see complete stupidity I can't help myself, it's just too easy
I'm not pro guns. I'm anti-gun control. I'm just pointing out that these things are tools. Guns are rarely used to shoot someone. Much more often, they are used to prevent crime. This doesn't make the news, though, because it's much less exciting than when a gun is used to commit a crime. Often, a gun doesn't even need to be fired to be used in defense, and even more often, it doesn't even need to be drawn. Criminals avoid armed citizens. That's a
fact. If guns are made illegal,
by definition, only criminals will have guns.
The gun control argument isn't anti-guns, As has been pointed out, they'll need guns to take them from the average Joe. They just want the guns concentrated in the hands of government agents. I even heard one proponent say that "Government employees don't go on rampages with their guns." Which is patently false. Even discounting the "going postal" phenomenon, there is a specific group of government employees whose
job it is to go on murderous rampages with their guns. At the moment, they are being
primarily used overseas, but historically, once the citizenry is disarmed at home, this group is turned upon them: