Topic: In The Span Of six months what will make you trust a new casino - page 3. (Read 539 times)

Having no scam accusations and a responsive representative here in bitcointalk would certainly gain my respect to these casinos but certainly not trust. Trust is something that I will never really give to any platform at all. And that means I will not leave any money in the platform when it's not really needed. I'd just deposit something when I want to play and get it when I'm done. I'll entrust these guys to run the casino business smoothly, but not 100% with other people's money. There are some established casinos that just went down without any explanation with people's funds, and if that isn't something that one should be wary about, then I don't know what will.

It may sound a little strange but my answer wasn’t listed in the options. I actually think a good celebrity endorsement goes a long way. That’s because with all the laws surrounding casinos and endorsements I would assume that the celebrity’s management team did their homework to make sure the casino was safe and legitimate for users.

It all starts with a very good representative. That is what they are assigned for and to inform the community that they are cooperative and very open to suggestions, details, and improvements and being heard whether you're not so big or big on this community, that's what makes people too attentive with the newly launched casinos. I think reviews and signature campaigns are also helpful because it's about giving them exposure to the community that they are in.

But if it's about trust, it shouldn't just be good reviews but also bad reviews. What they need is an honest reviews from the known people that are on this thing. We've got a few people that are into this matter and they give honest takes from the casinos that they are part of. About no complaints and scam accusations. It is rare to see a casino that don't have these problems. It's always a matter of customer that they will expose some problems that they've faced with these casinos but in the end, they won't be justified and caught lying.

And that's the same position for the newly launched casinos and also for the old ones, so basically as long as there are proofs that they've been wronged or false accused or actually faced a problem that they shouldn't, it's all about black and white proofs, left and right not just about accusations with words without valid proof.

I agree into this one, this is what most people would be looking upon on which if there would be no complaints for a period of time or simply even if they do have experience
some technical issues but they had resolved out immediately then it wont be hard that they will be getting trust soon. If this one is really that connected with some
trust related issue then this is where problem do starts and  sooner or later this site will die or wither away because community is really that highly reactive
when it comes to scam on which same as you said. Once proven then you would be dumped down.

Its a no brainer.
No complaints or scam accusations

If we do able to see a casino which doesnt have any scam accusations or issues when it comes to withdrawals and fairness of the games then we can really say that it is really that something that people would really be trusting it out not for the span of 6 months on which even on a couple of months people would really be having that kind of trust but not on the sense on having that full trust but at least it would really be something progressive. We do know that people here on this forum would really be that always skeptical when it comes to new services or platforms on which it would really be just that normal that they would really be having those hesitations and observations.

When something is really that an odd thing or actions been done then the community would really be easily be able to spot on, on which it would really be just that normal that you would really be that
comments and feedbacks would really be something real time and something that you could be able to read up whether its positive or negative and this is
the beauty on having this forum.

of these options there is no guarantee that the casino will continue to run without problems because some time ago there were casinos that ended up being fraudulent.
but even so, at least 2 of these choices make me a little confident that the casino is worth using because with an active representative we will never be afraid that if a problem occurs we can always solve it through the representative and on the one hand, all of this must be supported by reviews or good reputation from other customers so these two options can provide some confidence but will not deposit large amounts before the casino has been running for a few years.

I'm sure most of the people on this forum will say the same thing because they always prioritize reputation and also responsive representatives in the gambling section. many new gambling companies have active representatives, but after the casino grows bigger, these representatives become lazier and dont seem to want to reply quickly.
what is certain is that as long as the casino reputation is good, it will be worth using for fun.

Launching a review or signature campaign shows that the new casino wants to attract gamblers on Bitcointalk to their casino therefore they won't scam anybody as it'll destroy their reputation on the forum and the managers will guide them so I can trust a casino that have a signature campaign on the forum. From the signature campaign, the casino will be reviewed by many trusted gamblers on the forum and they'll give their review if the casino can be trusted.

Good reviews from sites outside the forum cannot be trusted as they can be fake rating, casino can buy good feedback from the rating site so they can have more players and scam them. If a crypto casino isn't on the forum and very active as well I don't trust them. All crypto casino have to be here so they can communicate to those individuals that use their casino through their announcement thread on the forum.

For new casino to gain trust, here is what it should do:

1) running a signature campaing and competitions are a must. We have already lots of casinos, but in first pages of gambling section are those who spend funds on promotion

2) hire a manager who will be on the forum or telegram. There are never any good when gamblers tall with each other or with wall abou the casino.

3) simply be active and respond to everything on social media. I know it is hard, but each gambler likes individual attention. Even if a casino gives a gambler a like as a respond, it matters a lot.

If casino follow these steps, more likely I would trust it and make a test deposit.

It's a good signal the casino is committed in building their reputation inside the gambling community, investing a budget there. It's not the solely reason why I would trust a recently launched casino, but it would definitely add positive points to final evaluation.

Well, this a tricky point. We can't prevent any casinos from having complaints or scam accusations against them. Even reputable long lasting ones face this issue in a daily basis. What we must pay attention to is if those complaints and accusations can be proved and are legit. If there are robust evidences the casino is operating in a shady way, of course it would be a decisive factor to completely delete the platform from our gambling alternatives. Some people don't take it too seriously, because they think to not be going to become the next victims, but in fact, they can be the next victim of a casino doing selective scam, anyone is prone to. So stay away.

This is another positive point which enters in the same category of review and signature campaign inside bitcointalk forum. Also, it would be very helpful when replying to complainsts and accusations, as mentioned on the previous question. So, issues can be solved and cleared faster, not giving any margins to doubts and mistrust among gamblers.

Reviews are always a must when picking a casino to deposit and play. We have to read opinions and personal experiences of another gamblers to decide if it worths accessing a casino platform or not. However, we have to make sure the review site we are visiting is a reputable one, just like the casino we are looking for... There are some shady reviews websites around which exist just to make income from traffic through ads. These must be avoided, because they don't add anything important and considerable to our knowledge.

This can also be a criteria to be a requirement with review campaigns and signature campaigns where the majority here believe that this casino has done good enough even though this is just a mere advertising marketing on forums

It is also important that there are no complaints or accusations of any kind, because one would think that when there are frequent complaints and accusations that gamblers will usually avoid problematic casinos.

Representatives who provide fast responses are better, when there are cases they can explain and provide solutions to problems more quickly and this is usually what is expected in forums when the casino has a fast response representative

Not too sure, because some of the reviews have high ratings but don't match the existing solutions

I cannot speak on behalf of review campaigns, those do look to be fine but I think it is not as valid as signature ones. However, if we were to talk about signature campaigns, it is not just about making money, it is about the fact that you are not going to find any other marketing that would be as cheap as signature campaign and also get your name heard by the same amount of people.

The people here can be rich crypto investors, not all of us are like that, I am not rich for example, but bitcointalk has a lot of people who have dozens of bitcoin and more, some have hundreds, few even have thousands. So that means, by spending just like 2-3 thousand a week, which should be cheap for someone who wants to build a big casino, you get to market your casino to people with millions of dollars in bitcoin and willing to gamble.

When choosing a service, company or organization to work with, people choose the ones they trust the most. And how does this trust come about?
I would simply say from reputation. If a company or organization can create a good and strong reputation overtime, people will definitely prefer to use them from time to time. therefore I believe if a company can build that in six months especially with positive reviews, fast and reliable transactions, active and responsive customer service they will definitely earn the trust of their user or customers.

No business could ascertain the success in the future as it's a risky venture, they take risk and hope to succeed. Marketing expenses are just funds they have to risk and hope it will result to building a community and attract gamblers to play and hopefully be loyal. Running a casinos nowadays does really requite a lot of funds, that if they want to stay competitive. And this budget for marketing or promotion is not only in a limited period of time as even these successful casinos now are still doing promotion, it seems like it's already part of the business operation, without that, a casino will be dull looking.


It's on how these promotions are being manage, as there are casinos who spend a decent amount of money for promotion and yet they didn't achieve the expected result, so it's also a gamble on their part.

It would appear the casino only haave a few funds for the marketing that's why they are limiting their promotion time to six months. Are they able to ascertain whether the casino will be successful or not after 6 months?

The decline i business is faster than the growth. Due to the competition in online casinos, the marketing of the casino actually shouldn't stop because once they do, the rest of the casinos who are keeping their visibility to the public are the ones going to keep gaining clients. Once Stake halts its campaigns, they will see the effect in less than 3 months.

A very responsive representative is what I like to see. Not that they'll create an ANN Thread and will just leave it behind, it's still nice to see if there's a representative that will constantly communicate with the community with their updates and promotions.

In any business, marketing and customer service is very important, creating an ANN thread is their way to communicate and build a community, so that's what I like to see. If they communite, it means they value the community a lot that they considered one of the reasons for their current success and in the future.

Loyalty is such a bitch. There will be those who will try to take them down but it's all about reputation. Wise members here will not fall for such a trap so I bet they will be protected by gamblers who think they are a good gambling site in the long run.

What they must do?
Keep the reputation high. I've seen gambling sites that have ignored what people will say and I think that's a red flag. They may be cheap players who only play for cents but they must be seen and taken care of or it could ruin everything. What I am saying is, that every gambler should be important to them either they are poor or not because that will tell how much they are caring for every customer in their midst.
There will be gamblers who will fake their identities as cheap players because they are testing the reliability of the gambling sites so everyone should be answered with their queries especially if they are new to the industry.

Launching a review and signature campaign on the forum is a promotional initiative for the site, it doesn’t make me trust the casino. I would be convinced if the casino has a long standing campaign history on the forum because that would mean they have solid reputation around here but for a new casino, no.

In my experience, scam casinos care more about promotions than resolving problems with their reputation. So definitely a casino with zero complaints or scam accusations would be my top pick.. There are many scams casinos online, you can see a lot of threads on scam accusations pertaining to mostly withdrawal problems and so on. As a precaution, it’s important to check for scam accusations on and off the forum.

Would be plausible but that's not really the big deal there, I think the clean slate in terms of reputation is something that will trump that promotion thingy because that means that their gambling operation is running smooth and there's no way that you're going to be experiencing anything bad in there.

If six months after a casino launches its site and doesn't get any complaints or scam accusations from anyone, I think I can start to trust the casino. Maybe I will try to register myself with the casino, but I am not going to deposit any money yet and still want to wait a little longer to see the response from others. If more people are satisfied with the service provided by the casino, perhaps I will deposit a small amount of money to check and test the casino. And if there really are no problems during the trial period, then I will use the casino as a place to gamble. But I also won't deposit a larger amount of money to avoid losing a lot and things I don't want.

Within 6 months is the time for them to be able to develop and feel the competition in the gambling business, of course when there are things that allow for shady or scams, they cannot be seen in just 6 months.
All the casinos that are now shady or scam casinos initially ran well so there was no suspicion that they would become casinos full of manipulation and scams.
Everything will be visible when it takes more than 1 year when they fail to develop rapidly and the profit income is not much greater than the expenses incurred in building and paying all the team.

But there are also casinos that can look good from the start, namely by looking at how the customer service is and how enthusiastic all the customers are, whether there are complaints that result in the casino cheating or not.
Personally, I don't really like using or making new casino my favorite, but when a new casino appears, I always try to play there several times with the aim of testing and adding new experiences.