Topic: In The Span Of six months what will make you trust a new casino - page 5. (Read 537 times)

The points you mentioned are consistent with each other to create my perception that the new casino platform is credible.
About positive reviews on websites, can you trust them 100%? of course not right.
Therefore, to determine whether it is good or not, we also have to look at other factors that are interconnected.

But if asked to choose one, the most important point for me is a fast response from a representative, not a template answer that we often encounter on gambling sites usually.

I agree, an active representation here to handle issues and critic will help for credibility. And in my eyes, if some established members write a positive review (i.e. Efialtis with BTCGOSU), than it further helps to increase the trust in a new casino as it is based on their own opinion and not biased (or paid by the casino).

I very much rely on the good reviews from trusted members in the Bitcointalk community. If a casino does not have a good reputation here, then I will not even look into it. It is just too risky. And casino review sites are absolutely not trustworthy in my personal opinion, since many of the reviews can be easily faked by some anonymous "reviewers". Also a good community management shows that the casino is trying to communicate with their members.

But if the casino has even one justified scam accusation, which is unresolved, then I will also avoid that casino.

I chose a responsive representative, getting complaints and scam accusations is inevitable at some point and having a responsive representative will be a great way to address those issues. I want to see a representative who properly handles and acknowledges issues that might be presented to them. 

good reviews from casino review sites and launching a review and signature campaign is not really a great way to base someone's trust in a casino.

In my case it depends on 2 scenarios. in scenario 1, if I am a participant in the casino's subscription campaign, I will have to trust the casino during the period in which I am part of the casino's subscription campaign, after that I would just spend playing with little money until the casino has more time operating, even if it had been running for 2 years, I wouldn't put a lot of money into the new casino if I had a lot of money. As I always follow my responsible gaming rules, I am always very careful not to use too many casinos, I only use a few casinos so that I am not putting money in that I cannot afford to lose. Now in scenario 2 where I have never seen the casino before and never participated in the casino's subscription campaign, I keep doing research on the internet to see the casino's reputation

and in the research I do, I look for negative comments about the casino and I'm not interested in the positive comments about the casino, because most of the time the positive comments are fake and don't reflect reality, when I see that the casino has a lot of negative comments and I see that in this forum there are accusations of scams, so I use the casino and I prefer to continue using the old casino which is more reliable. The truth is that using a new casino is not easy, and the person needs to be very cautious and not put too much money into the new casino, I always give exe advice, but I'm always shocked when someone comes to this forum to complain about a new casino and I see that this person deposited a lot of money, I'm wondering what kind of courage this could be

The most acceptable phenomenon in the forum was the trusted background of the owners and bankroll never being the trusted gambling site.If the gambling site had the funds for the gambling advertising like review and signature campaign,it mean that the gambling site would have enough funds to handle such campaign.So the gambling site will have the funds for the players who have win the game in their gambling site.This was the basic reason why many trusted gambling site hosting the signature and review campaigns in the forum.It also help to the visibility of the game signature in the forum,this help the gambler to use of that gambling site.

In my personal case it would take both a very engaging and participating representative here in the forum, who takes special attention on solving any doubt or problem any User and gambler could have about the casino, it would also would convince me not to see any scam acusation or massive serious problems being reported about this casino here in this forum.

The reviews of a casino in any centralized webpage, where comments and posts are regulated, opens the window for manipulation to happen.
A casino launching a campaign of signatures her does not immediately equals to a better reputation, actually there have been shady services here which have tried to fool newcomers using signature campaigns and similar devices.

Some reviews here in Bitcointalk coming from reasonable members are more worth it that any Trustpilot-like webpage could offer to us. Though, I understand there are better webpages which do not allow shilling and completely dedicated to casinos.

My vote goes to having a representative because all it takes is one bad experience from a user to start a scam accusation and they could shed some light on those accusations and even fix them. This doesn't mean i'll immediately trust any new casino once they have a representative. It still depends on how well they can deal with different cases because i've seen others that started with a representative or community manager and still fail to increase their reputation. With a representative, the players get a bit of reliability knowing there's someone they can reach out to and forward their problem.

Definitely complains are part of development because at the end what really matters is how best the casino is able to meet up with the demands of their clients and comolans are like feedbacks because it can also be a way for the casino to keep improving their feature and fixed bugs and also to explain some other features to their customers.

Although complains is different from accusation or scam act which are left unresolved by the casino which will give them a bad image in the end,  but if the casino can manage those accusations and get issues resolved it goes a long way to provingprove community of reputable there are at the end of the day.

Launching a new signature campaign is for advertisement, thus it will not be a good criterion to trust a casino. And some casinos have performed below expectations after launching a long-term campaign. Casino reviews are not always reliable because anybody or institution can review casinos.
My first choice will be fewer complains and fewer scam accusations. I said less because it is not possible for a casino operate for six months without complaints or scam accusations. This is when my next choice will fall which is responsive representative. How they handle these complains and accusations will determine the level of my trust in them.

there had been platforms launching campaigns in the forum that turned out to be scams which this option is not to guarantee the casino is trustworthy. they may not have had the intention before but when the business didn't go well. but i don't know if a casino can determine the success of the casino after launching it after 6 months, it could be a premature decision.

there is no way to tell whether a casino is a scam or not we only know it is a scam when they have done it already. they'd have that burden as long as they operate.

Launching a review and signature campaign is not a metric to say if that site is trustworthy or not. Well, the rest of those choices can be but not that one. It happens in the forum already and many of them turn to a scam after receiving and hearing complaints about it. Besides, the review and signature campaign serves as market promotion to gain popularity and to let the community know about this project, scammers can do that. Even having no complaints and a responsive support system, these things still never give us assurance which is why we have to act cautiously. Well, at least having things gives us some hope and fate. Reputation really matters...

This will depend on how you will be benefiting or utilizing the casino because they're not going to have the same answers depending on your purpose. Say for example you're planning to use their casino and you will be playing there then it's in your best interest to know if they're not involved in any scam accusations or any hot issue that are damaging to their reputation, sure it might be a problem if you're watching out for them to launch a signature campaign but that can't be that important at all because 1xbit still found some success doing a campaign here. But since it's all about trust, I don't think it's going to be worth your salt to think that the casino launching a campaign and immediately gain the trust of people, look at 1xbit again.

For me one of the most important aspects of trusting a casino is interacting with the community in meaningful ways, so running interactive promotions that are lead by experienced community members us important.

But more than anything else, I want a proper implementation of provably fair games. You don't really have to trust the fairness of a casino if you can verify it yourself. As kf trusting a casino with bigger deposits it's good to have some time pass without accusations and resolutions to any issues that might arise.

a valid complaint can be seen if the complainant has all his proofs relating to the said complaint. if not, some are just ruining the reputation of the casino. i've seen that several times here in the forum. if the complaint is not valid, then, should not count for the negative points of the casino.

i am also in this option, if there is no to little number of valid complaints, then i guess, i would go for this casino. other factors are just secondary, and if those other factors are satisfied by the casino, it can gain positive results for the casino itself. this is why i can say the poll results for now is what the general sentiments on this query.

Having a signature campaign here with huge marketing funds as well as having an active representative here makes me easily trust a certain casino. This is what I do when I discover coins.game casino which is so far a very good casino due to its rewards. I never encounter major issue on this casino due to their helpful support.


I doubt this will be helpful as solely reference when playing since the casino is just new and I’m sure even the review site is just tested it few time before they publish review. You need something that will assure you that they will not run like marketing funds that show how serious they are on their business.

There is no way a casino will have no complains and good reviews can be bought for the marketing of the casino. What I think should be considered the most is how long the casino has been in the business and is still responsible for making people earn on their platform.

The longer the casino operates and has solved complains, I think it can be trusted. But there must be truth to the casino the is promoting here in bitcointalk. The community appreciates more to those casinos who are also joining the community since this is almost like a partnership with the crypto community.

Talking about complaints and accusations, of course there is always a complaint at the end, because no casino can guarantee that it will always provide good and excellent service without any interruptions. To be precise, they only try to provide the best service, so that their visitors can remain loyal and loyal to visit the casino. And speaking of accusations, currently online gambling is quite popular and has a lot of fans, and the increasing number of gambling sites from day to day makes business competition in the world of gambling very tight. so accusations of fraud leveled at one particular casino are normal. But even so, this greatly affects the reputation of a casino.

And I can trust that the casino is really safe to visit, when the reviews on the casino look pretty good, because good reviews can, in a small way, convince someone to trust that casino. But to ensure this, we have to actually visit the casino. and after that we give an assessment about whether the casino is good or not.

What I mean is a valid scam complaint we all know there are cheaters, opportunists, and blackmailers especially for new casinos if they can address the complaint right away and prove that the accusation is not a valid one, just created to extort or cast doubts on the casino, then the complaints will backfire against the complainant.
The community is wise enough to see who's telling the truth we have seen some instances where the complainants are just making it out to look a new casino bad.

I voted for "no complaints or scam accusations", why? these are some of my reasons.

1. running a signature campaign is not the first time to do by casino, because I believe that before a company decides to hold a signature campaign, there must be an announcement first. From this announcement, even though there are only a few members, there will definitely be those who try to register and provide reviews.

2. If there are several complaints from this review, then it is possible that the CS quality is less responsive. allegations of scam, clearly this could be the start of a negative image for the casino. Therefore, seeing that there are no excessive complaints and is free from accusations of being a scam, then I will be sure that this casino is safe to try.

3. Being unresponsive in forums and live chat certainly indicates a lack of professionalism in solving problems. but the first time, complain is important to know how they are solved every complains.

4. Reviews from external websites can be fake reviews, maybe because they are paid to give positive reviews. reviews from forum members who have tried and not complained can be more valid.