Topic: Inside-the-Dragons-Den-Bitcoin-Cores-Troll-Army - page 4. (Read 3897 times)

forum is BITCOIN... not CORE talk

bitcoin is more diverse then just core. if you think only core=bitcoin then you have got cabin fever

There are people from both sides that engage in misinformation drives. It is especially in the interest of Bitcoin Unlimited to do this. They bombard the forums with misinformation, get "boots on the street", and then get the Core developers out of the picture.

Now well known BTU shills accuse Bitcoin community in shilling  are you fucking stupid? read the Title of this site - BITCOINtalk not unlimited of other china shit talk

I was talking about dragonsden... There were 21 members (allegedly, I honestly think there were more), but only 1 was a dev.

Of course there is more than 1 dev on the entire Core slack LOL. That is where a lot of development discussion goes down nowadays.

only one core dev in the slack of bitcoin-core...??
though it appears #dragons dn is shut down.. lets see if only 1 core dev uses that slack

hmmm



yep more then one name

Yea... there's only one Core developer in that chatroom.

Anyone remember the r/btc mod who claimed Roger Ver hired a PR firm to astroturf for BU?

https://archive.fo/Prdem

im just waiting for the DCG fund receivers to chime in and say that this virtual 'cabin in the woods' they use is actually used to have serious corporate discussions away from the anti-blockstream people
as their way of admitting such a place exists but not admit the content of what happens within. much like the round table closed door events with their chatham house rules

agreed, 1/3 of a brain.

When I read your Statements , Lauda

I was Shocked


I figured you were at Least a General in Bitcoin Core Troll Army.  

If you need anyone to Vote to up your status in Bitcoin Core Troll Army,
you got my vote for one of their Very Best Core Trolls.
CB got my vote too if he needs it.  

 

Maybe that is the problem , if you only had a complete % of a brain, you be smart enough to know Core is full of shit.

Kind of proves my point a few weeks ago, 


 

lol and spot people like Lauda(was theymos staffer recently) and others who try getting 5 minutes of fame by spell checking a document. just to get their name in the list.
the amount of people with commit 'fame' for spell checking is very much a comedy.

i guess you also missed the parts where to get a 'bip' listed, requires LukeJRs(was gmax)(both blockstream) approval which needs mailinglist approval which are moderated by blockstream whereby they try to get you to have mentioned it in this forums technical discussion section first(gmax/theymos mod) or the irc(blockstream mod) or the reddit(theymos).
all moderated by the same group of people.

All anyone with 1/3 of a brain can do is look at the git commit log of bitcoin-core, and the discussion in the bitcoin-dev mailing list and realize that the core devs are the heros of the bitcoin story (along with Satoshi of course).

i know your angry that you have to kiss corporate ass and give up your morals and personal opinions just to live and keep your income flowing. even having to subsidise your income with the crappy sig-spamming

thus angry that i have made my income personally from being an early adopter. thus i have the freedom to not need to kiss ass and can remain frank about my opinion while travelling around without borders, limits or having a boss to report to

i just hope one day you realise blockstream will move on and you realise this before they do, so that your not wasting your time kissing ass for no reason.

try to in future. when thinking of replying. look in the mirror and think about what hat you are wearing when you reply. and make sure its a
diverse decentralised bitcoin hat... and not a blockstreamist defender hat.

then maybe you can recover some respect. because you wont attain any of the blockstreamist titles of
bitcoin-wizard
bitcoin-dragon
bitcoin-ninja

Saturday night. Before going out I open a thread that has bitcoin core / blockstream / segwit in the title and what do I find you ask? of course, franky1 posting wall of texts. I hope you get paid well man, your thing is ridiculous.

lol Lauda
i know your trying to move up the ranks by getting your spell checking skills notice by blockstream, now that your no longer a forum staff member and looking for a new job.
but your "you're wrong because wrong" arrogant and meaningless and very empty rebuttles are foolishly not winning you favours

many people including myself have tried to ask you to learn c++
many have tried to help you evn by hinting things you could larn about bitcoin without having to know c++.. such as consensus
but a year on all you want to do is defend those in the DCG portfolio such as blockstream.. rather than defend bitcoins original diverse decentralised ethos.

you cannot explain away how the DCG portfolio group made their 'exchange' announcement about how they would handle a controversial fork
you cannot explain the bitcoin slack
you cannot explain the closed door round table meetings
you cannot explain the other stuff going around

so either just come forward and admit you dont care about bitcoins diverse and decentralised ethos and only want t defend the pockets of those VC investors behind blockstream
or
wise up, wake up and start caring about bitcoin.
because im afraid to tell you this. but blockstream are IN DEBT to the tune of $70m and trying to kiss ass with hopes of employment wont work

they are already planning their exit strategy, even one of their founders has jumped out (mattcorallo now with chaincode labs)
and soon enough blockstream will sell out to highest bidder and move onto hyperledger

so if yo care about bitcoin. drop your defensive stance for blockstream and start thinking about bitcoin.
because so far your empty arguments in defending blockstream are becoming more like a comedy event

i would have respect for any of the blockstreamist defenders if they would even dare to rebuttle comments about code issues, beyond just saying "shill, wrong, liar,"

There is no such thing as the "Bitcoin Core Troll Army". My post from another thread:

the craig wright things are distractions.

note that craig write drama always pops up right when there is a round table debate.

late 2015
mid 2016
early 2017

all of which were when there were round table closed door discussions just to avoid people asking about what was actually discussed in these closed door discussions

dont believe me.. ask yourself what has the community learned about the january 2017 round table.. apart from
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-new-satoshi-nakamoto-rumors/

but anything actually bitcoin related was all hush hush

this channel exists and it has as a leader Craig Wright.
For real now. What are you smoking guys? can i have some. because it seems this staff is a non stop trip.

10 blockstream paid devs and 90+ unpaid interns that will blindly follow the paid devs in hopes for an interview and salary in the future

Core devs: 100 people making bitcoin better

jonald whatever: 10000000 posts shitposting and achieving nothing

Here is a better worth reading article:

https://medium.com/@WhalePanda/asicboost-the-reason-why-bitmain-blocked-segwit-901fd346ee9f