Other than health insurance is not essential for me because, as long as I'm healthy, I can do many things. Besides, the regulations in insurance are usually unfair, possibly due to the type of insurance we choose or even the monthly bill we pay. And health insurance cannot guarantee someone's perfect health 100%, like in the case of a body part being amputated due to an accident... the insurance cannot provide a natural human limb that functions like the original. Instead, they compensate with cash, which in this context might sound like "selling our body parts for money."
-snip-
Statements like this in my opinion cannot be justified, because after all we don't know it will always be healthy or not.
The economic level also will not guarantee you can bear everything without insurance.
At least you have one insurance that will cover when something happens that you don't want.
I myself have a government-run insurance, and it is very useful for my family.
Regarding the injustice of insurance regulations depends on each insurance policy.
Indeed, there are some insurance that is naughty and does not even give the customer the rights.
But for government insurance I have never complained about unfair rules or about how they are handled, everything is going well.
Any insurance will not guarantee perfect health, there will certainly never be.
It's all been a risk, because to recover 100% it takes a long time like when an accident and there are body parts that have to be amputated, of course that's the procedure and insurance will back up costs for surgery, not give a miracle by regrowing his legs.
If you are more open and see from the positive side, insurance has many benefits for those who cannot afford it.
Especially if you have insurance that is obtained from the government, and it is free, it will provide an opportunity to be treated well when there are sick family members, We cannot just look at one perception.