cryptogay!
I put links of that poll in different threat to find people and opinion!
But you? you are exactly spammer.
cryptohunter(gay) is big spammer.
Topic: IOTA - Permissioned ledger Russian extortion scheme - page 17. (Read 20175 times)
Please stay on topic.
Very well, I created an on-topic discussion:
IOTA - Permissioned ledger Russian extortion scheme
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/iota-permissioned-ledger-russian-extortion-scheme-1414866
You do understand that staying on topic and creating your own topic is not the same...
IMO,
r0ach real goals seems to be about sprouting the nonsense about what is a permission or permission less ledger.
I don't think he is worried about anything else.
+1
Agreed! That's the truth. Therefore he wrote massive amounts of bullshit here.
cryptohunter only you are the spammer. You spaming with your Lisk every thread and propagating your lies about IOTA everywhere, because are you afraid of Iota? You deleted my post in the self-moderated topic. Read it again:
By the way
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2016/03/14/can-bitteasers-blockchain-ad-network-disrupt-pay-per-click-market/#78b8ef064e22
Quote
new technologies will be integrated into the platform, bringing their own unique advantages. One such development is IOTA, an ‘Internet-of-Things’ currency that takes a radically different approach to regular blockchain technology to deliver fee-free transactions as well as unprecedented scalability
Now also Forbes writes about IOTA. Revolutionary ideas of the Iota project becomes known everywhere.
I hope this fact will not make some envious of the IOTA project persons even more sad and serious?
Hello everyone!
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
How can I vote for IOTA - this is the biggest ICO scam.... way worse than the two above.
Also can you stop spamming this on every thread ?
I just want to understand opinion of people, I am not a spammer
You are spamming this on every thread. You are a spammer.
Hello everyone!
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
How can I vote for IOTA - this is the biggest ICO scam.... way worse than the two above.
Also can you stop spamming this on every thread ?
I just want to understand opinion of people, I am not a spammer
Hello everyone!
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
How can I vote for IOTA - this is the biggest ICO scam.... way worse than the two above.
Also can you stop spamming this on every thread ?
Hello everyone!
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
I would like to understand from what side is smelling like a SCAM!!!
Please, do me a favour - make your vote here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1415320
and here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14339500
Thank you for support.
Special Poll:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-is-the-biggest-scam-today-ethereum-or-lisk-1415614
"permissionless" is a fantasy in the real world for any coin.
I assume you are an expert in cryptocoins so I don't ask for a proof.
If you ask, you'll get an awful smelling bowl of reductionism . "Mmmmm, stupidity!"
"permissionless" is a fantasy in the real world for any coin.
I assume you are an expert in cryptocoins so I don't ask for a proof.
Yes, it is true, I can technically "interact" with IOTA on a "permissionless" level, but that interaction has no purpose unless you're first able to acquire the native token of the protocol. It doesn't really matter if you can interact with it in some meaningless way if you're not spending native coins...
50 BTC bet - and I'll show you how to interact with Iota on a "permissionless" level in a meaningful way without spending native tokens.
PS: Someone quote this, please, I feel he will make appearance that he hasn't noticed this post.
"permissionless" is a fantasy in the real world for any coin.
Yours included.,
By the way , exactly how does your coin propagate?
FYI:
Looked at your Thread , you seem to be having issues meeting a release date.
Creepy Feature setting in?
Yes, it is true, I can technically "interact" with IOTA on a "permissionless" level, but that interaction has no purpose unless you're first able to acquire the native token of the protocol. It doesn't really matter if you can interact with it in some meaningless way if you're not spending native coins...
50 BTC bet - and I'll show you how to interact with Iota on a "permissionless" level in a meaningful way without spending native tokens.
PS: Someone quote this, please, I feel he will make appearance that he hasn't noticed this post.
1. Take a general very weak "argument" against ico coins
2. Use it against IOTA only
genious
2. Use it against IOTA only
genious
That's called an extortion scheme, and it's not a permissionless ledger either. The extortion blueprint is:
1) Create PoS or IOTA tokens out of thin air with most or all residing in a genesis block which you control.
2) Attempt to convince or force others to require them for some purpose
3) Since you cornered the market already on day one by design, everyone is now required to go through you and your associates to be extorted at will
That covers the extortion part.
1) Create PoS or IOTA tokens out of thin air with most or all residing in a genesis block which you control.
2) Attempt to convince or force others to require them for some purpose
3) Since you cornered the market already on day one by design, everyone is now required to go through you and your associates to be extorted at will
That covers the extortion part.
I was thinking extortion is when someone forces you to do something. Nobody forced me to buy tokens, I took the risk myself.
Classic 
So you wanna buy some IOTA?
So your MO is jumping to wrong conclusions based on little to no information--makes perfect sense now.
Accurate Conclusions, and that is why it takes 3 or more of you to try and cover it up.
FYI:
My MO is shining Logic on that Lying Theory you guys keep putting out to try and create good PR for a failing PoW system.
Dude's a loon. He's arguing since basically everything could become permissioned in his imagination (you parents decided to keep you therefore your living is permissioned--at least this seems where his reductionism will get him), therefore a system that is a one-step permissioned system is as good a system as any other.
I imagine this is how he would defend a murder client. "You could die if a plane hits you, an ebola virus gets hold of you, a giraffe could stomp you to death, basically something will kill you, so what difference is that from what my client did? It was going to happen sooner or later anyway."
I imagine this is how he would defend a murder client. "You could die if a plane hits you, an ebola virus gets hold of you, a giraffe could stomp you to death, basically something will kill you, so what difference is that from what my client did? It was going to happen sooner or later anyway."
Says the star wars reject, (Did I strike a nerve with the single comment)
you just PO, cause I proved your theory invalid and you need people to believe PoW is better , when it's not.
Would not defend a murder client , if I knew he was guilty, morals would prevent that in my case, but since you see the world that way , it tells me money is too much in your motivation.
So your MO is jumping to wrong conclusions based on little to no information--makes perfect sense now.
Dude's a loon. He's arguing since basically everything could become permissioned in his imagination (you parents decided to keep you therefore your living is permissioned--at least this seems where his reductionism will get him), therefore a system that is a one-step permissioned system is as good a system as any other.
I imagine this is how he would defend a murder client. "You could die if a plane hits you, an ebola virus gets hold of you, a giraffe could stomp you to death, basically something will kill you, so what difference is that from what my client did? It was going to happen sooner or later anyway."
I imagine this is how he would defend a murder client. "You could die if a plane hits you, an ebola virus gets hold of you, a giraffe could stomp you to death, basically something will kill you, so what difference is that from what my client did? It was going to happen sooner or later anyway."
Says the star wars reject, (Did I strike a nerve with the single comment)
you just PO, cause I proved your theory invalid and you need people to believe PoW is better , when it's not.
Would not defend a murder client , if I knew he was guilty, morals would prevent that in my case, but since you see the world that way , it tells me money is too much in your motivation.
FYI:
Quote
everything could become permissioned
What you fail to understand is it is not a could become permissioned, but most everything is already permissioned due to requiring FIAT for the service.Generalized Permission or Specific Permission is still Permission.
Your Payment of FIAT to your Electricity , ISP , ASICS Reseller Provider, is why they granted you Permission to use their Services or buy their goods.
Don't send them their FIAT and watch how quickly they revoke their permission to use their systems, which you need to mine BTC.
Your Permission Less MYTH is Busted!
Is it ironic to anyone else that this guy is hyping up some PoS coin called Zeitcoin, which is an interest based, rich get richer system as the cure for all of societies monetary problems? That coin, if I'm not mistaken, was actually based on that "Zeitgeist movement" thing. Some viral internet video most people have seen which had some viable points, then they released a second followup video expousing hardcore socialism as the solution to everything. Most people here are not socialists, but if you are one, proof of stake is the exact opposite of that. It's more like a share cropper system where everyone else who is not rich is your bitch.
Dude's a loon. He's arguing since basically everything could become permissioned in his imagination (you parents decided to keep you therefore your living is permissioned--at least this seems where his reductionism will get him), therefore a system that is a one-step permissioned system is as good a system as any other.
I imagine this is how he would defend a murder client. "You could die if a plane hits you, an ebola virus gets hold of you, a giraffe could stomp you to death, basically something will kill you, so what difference is that from what my client did? It was going to happen sooner or later anyway."
Jump to: