Spam attacks only help iota dont they now? The more spam the faster it goes you said.
We talk about different spam attacks.
Please refer where in the whitepaper network bound PoW is described or link to source code.
Why should I bother to explain it to you?
Maybe its not another of your fuckups like hashing function Curl which had to be replaced by sha3. Kthxbai.
Can't recall fuckups related to Curl, do you mean planned migration to Kerl before deploying final Curl? You probably do, you should improve your reading skills.
Disregard the fact when you lower PoW to miniscule levels, it opens for attack from GPUs or better, even if its network bound. 
Not sure if you lie or you just don't understand what you are talking about. Probably the both.
So retarded, PoW for security and hidden fees, yet low enough to work on IoT, even if with custom chip/asic/coprocessor it just means a single PC CPU or GPU can outcompete thousanda or millions of IoT devices. Power disparity.
Not sure if you lie or you just don't understand what you are talking about. Probably the both.
No wonder Iota only works with a centralized Coordinator node.
Centralized? Hehe, your words can't change the real state of things, you live in a world where magery doesn't exist.
Byteball does not have PoW at all.
This should be changed ASAP. Once someone figures out how I halted Byteball mainnet confirmations for several hours all Byteball holders will see purchase power of their GBs approaching zero.
