Topic: IOTA - Unmoderated thread - page 54. (Read 70768 times)

For the information of the noobs, naive and uninformed users, the target audience of this blatant scam: IOTA is an illegal financial securities product.
Just like we worked with law enforcement with regards to the Moolah, Bitbay and Banxshare scams (some of those scammers are in jail now), we will do everything we can to provide the authorities with all relevant information regarding this investment fraud and P&D scam. Ignore the IOTA CEO, the IOTA shills and sockpuppets, they are desperate to sell a fraud.

I know, I just wanted to point out that it's strange you haven't been contacted by the fbi, cia and darkwing duck yet.

He hasn't alerted shit, he knows we've done nothing illegal, he's a loser, a bad one.

by the way, when did you inform law enforcement?

I understand you are worried, but calm down Sergey. Enjoy the money for a while you scammed from the idiots by putting your NXT reputation on the line (what a reputation by the way to ride the Bitcoin waves by rolling out a blatant scam like NXT was) and promising an IoT system and an asynchronous microprocessor in which none of them you have any experience.

Do you refer to Darkwing Duck or Batman? If the former then I wouldn't take your words seriously.

Fine public display of your qualities. No wonder your momma basement based business - despite scamming over $ 500K from these wannabe rich idiots - has zero employee and zero sales. Combine this with your pathetic P&D effort at


and you verify that smooth is actually correct: you were selling a coin, an illegal investment product during the ICO instead of selling a software. But that was clear to everyone anyway, no wonder your sockpuppets and shills troll over the place about the wonderful ROI prospect of your scam.
No IoT team, no IoT system nor prospect to deliver the promised 10-15x ROI in the context of a real business process. Your promised 10-15x ROI can be delivered only via a P&D scam - what precisely you do.

You are in a deep trouble son, good luck in explaining this fraud to law enforcements. Hint: don't tell them you were selling software, they are not as stupid as your audience here.
 

Too late.

But then, I'm not fighting trolls here, just pointing out that some people supporting the project are ineffective in terms of communications.

Tangle based consensus is cool, if it works.

The fact that you have posted a meme as a reply should be alarming to you.

Beware that, when fighting trolls, you yourself do not become a troll.  - Friedrich Nietzsche

If we knew then what we know now, we all would, right? Nothing wrong with that.

smooth

If I knew about Nxt much earlier than I would have been with him since the first day.



' It likely fools very not many (though maybe a few do think you are sincere), and certainly not me.'

That is your opinion. Stay with a deprecated things.

Are you genuinely this stupid (single digit IQ) or just trying to save face? The sale is over, nothing we say post it will change anything in terms of law. From day 1 (month prior to sale was even live) we announced the IOTA as SOFTWARE and had Terms and Risk paper that outlined that it is in no way, shape or form an investment. It's software that exist in limited quantity, oracling, data transfer, messaging and additional features is SOFTWARE, the IOTA tokens represent the PoW behind said data. We never ever promised that this software would increase in value and warned that it might depreciate in terms of value.

I can't justify to myself wasting time on useless amalgams of atoms like yourself which serve absolutely no purpose in this universe. Enjoy being a troll

Was Nxt not also pure-ICO? I wasn't paying attention to Nxt when it launched, so maybe I got that wrong.

I asked a question about similarities because distribution methods and behavior of investors and community members could be related. I find the premise interesting. Do you disagree? If you do, that is fair enough, as I said I was just asking a question


^ More evidence of fucktardary in the form of defensiveness and bullshit right there. I already responded that it wasn't clear to me whether those were the same person or two people repeatedly making the same low-content posts using large type that does nothing at all for your credibility.

As for your pumping or anti-speculation, it was clear to me from before the ICO when you were pushing misleadingly exaggerated claims about the potential of the IOT market and IOTA's likely role in it (and I clearly identified such with specific quotes from your own sources) that you were a pumper.

Your supposed "anti-speculator" statements are almost certainly based on a legal strategy to frame your offering as a product and not an investment. It likely fools very not many (though maybe a few do think you are sincere), and certainly not me.

Independent of all this I do not know whether IOTA will be successful in some manner. It may be. The above should not be construed as criticism of the coin nor of its potential for speculation, as it is not intended that way. It could completely fail to live up to the wildly exaggerated pre-ICO claims of iotatoken and still be very successful (or not)!

When I make a specific recommendation positive or negative on a coin, which I do on rare occasion, I'm very clear about it. This is not one.

You are blatantly lying about sock accounts. Prove that I got a single sockaccount here and I'll give you all my BTC. Secondly you claim we are pumping, have you not seen that I am such a anti-pump and dumper that I have even been criticized by my own IOTA crowd for being so anti-speculation? I am saying ALL THE TIME: FUCK speculators, focus on the tech! Yet here you are perpetrating a false narrative, without even knowing jackshit about the project. If I found myself in your position of hating on more successful people than me I would be so embarrassed that my funeral would be imminent.

Further evidence? Yeah pal, but only for those who know nothing about and want not to research about new object but generalizes and not interested in the facts.

If you read iota forum you would have realized that the whole community and especially devs are fighting against pumping. Only troll altcoinUK make pumping and "black promotion" attracting others to understand what is right

Everybody in cryptoanarchy has the right to act in its own methods even if they do not coincide with the everybody's opinion but for impudent lies receive only the same arrogant response. Its my IMHO.

pure-ICO? Nxt? 

Pal ask for advice and do not cry in your good old mining forum (maybe Monero?) when your account based on old blockchain technology is hacked from quantum computer.

I supported many years mining. Now with a total of centralization not more.

^ Further evidence for


Is this an inevitable part of pure-ICO coins which lend themselves to pumping and incentivize people (especially people who are over invested and therefore trading on emotion) to become rabid shills?

Maybe I'm generalizing too much from a single example. Was Nxt like this? (Serious question)

smooth

Who denies the obvious arguments and blatantly inadequately lying and rejects ANY OBVIOUS FACTS deserves as well beat on his trolls snout and not a respect or normal discussion.

With Iota bringing the new innovation Tangle instead of a Blockchain, and you making posts in an Iota thread, I figured you would know about it.

When you look into it, I would like to know you're stance on it is all.

We haven't always agreed, but I do value your opinion. 

I have no opinion on the coin or the tech, I haven't studied it. But the people supporting it on this thread sure look like fucktards, that's for sure. I wouldn't trade based on that though -- do your own homework.