I think everyone needs to realize that when starting a business, each member is usually doing the work of many. The ideas of perfect foresight and endless resources are fantasies.
Let's cut some slack here. That doesn't mean remove criticisms, just be realistic.
It's very easy to critique when you're on the sidelines.
Topic: [IPVO] [Multiple Exchanges] Neo & Bee - LMB Holdings - page 151. (Read 658701 times)
To be fair, they made no such statement.
actually, they did:
The reasoning behind using a platform and not direct handling of shares for ourselves is down to the man hours required to operate on such a basis, we are operating in the real world, we have multiple aspects of the business that need constant oversight and attention, for myself to assign someone for the task is achievable however it comes at a cost to the business, we as a business do not specialize in the trading of shares or have a platform capable of doing so (at the moment) so the best solution is to operate using the platforms available to us. Do things need to change surrounding these platforms? YES they do, whilst we are investigating the matter in great detail we cannot provide a solution overnight.
if you dont like how neo operates, you could always go away
or, you could allow criticism and alternative opinions.Cryptocircus already stated that the allocation of resources required to implement and maintain direct shares is not something they wish to do. Just buy the shares back and cancel the IPO.
To be fair, they made no such statement. I had quoted the statement from TAT's comment, which was probably describing their position at the time, and the sentiment has shifted since then. I respect the efforts of all parties involved here, and think we should wait for the solution before criticizing it. A buyback won't happen unless the project itself is cancelled, so the rant is pointless anyway.
man, these early flippers. be a man take a hit and bail out I’ll catch you at 0.0015
Your delusional outburst offers nothing to the predicament shareholders find themselves in. Please save your comments for the playground.
Insulting people and bitching around solves nothing, this is their business I'm sure they're working the best they can for it to succeed.
yep. applies to other issuers and in general - everybody btw.
not AM. They have a direct share system in place for this exact situation.
If Havelock went down, I'm sure they would likely go that route. Right now with Havelock, they can plan ahead. Successful businesses don't usually make fast and drastic changes.
no, they should plan a contingency, and that should have been done BEFORE btct went down. Successful businesses don't wait to make plans AFTER something bad happens.if ur such a specialist, start your own btc biz and show everyone how to do it
judging is ez, doing is what matters
if you dont like how neo operates, you could always go away
yep. applies to other issuers and in general - everybody btw.
not AM. They have a direct share system in place for this exact situation.
If Havelock went down, I'm sure they would likely go that route. Right now with Havelock, they can plan ahead. Successful businesses don't usually make fast and drastic changes.
no, they should plan a contingency, and that should have been done BEFORE btct went down. Successful businesses don't wait to make plans AFTER something bad happens. i know this is hard for some of you turds but dont be daft
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
Cryptocircus already stated that the allocation of resources required to implement and maintain direct shares is not something they wish to do. Just buy the shares back and cancel the IPO.
buy back shares? get a clue
this isnt friggin walmart
you bought a stake and you bought the risks and rollercoaster rides that come with it
they should buy back your shares for original price when they are worth double next year
how bout that?
Your delusional outburst offers nothing to the predicament shareholders find themselves in. Please save your comments for the playground.
hey that was MY point about you, no fair
i know this is hard for some of you turds but dont be daft
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
Cryptocircus already stated that the allocation of resources required to implement and maintain direct shares is not something they wish to do. Just buy the shares back and cancel the IPO.
buy back shares? get a clue
this isnt friggin walmart
you bought a stake and you bought the risks and rollercoaster rides that come with it
they should buy back your shares for original price when they are worth double next year
how bout that?
Your delusional outburst offers nothing to the predicament shareholders find themselves in. Please save your comments for the playground.
i know this is hard for some of you turds but dont be daft
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
Cryptocircus already stated that the allocation of resources required to implement and maintain direct shares is not something they wish to do. Just buy the shares back and cancel the IPO.
buy back shares? get a clue
this isnt friggin walmart
you bought a stake and you bought the risks and rollercoaster rides that come with it
they should buy back your shares for original price when they are worth double next year
how bout that?
i know this is hard for some of you turds but dont be daft
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
Cryptocircus already stated that the allocation of resources required to implement and maintain direct shares is not something they wish to do. Just buy the shares back and cancel the IPO.
If Havelock went down, I'm sure they would likely go that route. Right now with Havelock, they can plan ahead. Successful businesses don't usually make fast and drastic changes.
i know this is hard for some of you turds but dont be daft
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
Cryptocircus already stated that the allocation of resources required to implement and maintain direct shares is not something they wish to do. Just buy the shares back and cancel the IPO.
i know this is hard for some of you turds but dont be daft
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
theres no planning needed for direct shares - they just convert your data into a spreadsheet and\or collect more info. thats it
stop insulting people and acting like children
and now you wanna call Ken a genius? hilarious
Not so. Ken at ACtM saw this coming and has created 2 sites to handle exchange of shares should BF go down. So why didn't these pros see this coming?
um. did not knew about Ken's solution. wise move indeed.
despite this Ken is hit with all that clutter too, just has some solution already, more or less (i haven't checked yet his site).
besides it seems not very convenient to handle different securities on different places, as of "investors view".
and nobody is perfect, right? Ken has his own disadvantages, exactly as everybody else.
some have right now, some later (and some in the past)
For such a 'mature' BTC operation, they seem to have been blindsided by an obvious upcoming issue.
So why didn't these pros see this coming?
I personally find this labeling interesting.
...they seem to have been blindsided by an obvious upcoming issue.
yep. applies to other issuers and in general - everybody btw.
Not so. Ken at ACtM saw this coming and has created 2 sites to handle exchange of shares should BF go down. So why didn't these pros see this coming?
I agree. Do you have a system in place for direct shares?
The reasoning behind using a platform and not direct handling of shares for ourselves is down to the man hours required to operate on such a basis, we are operating in the real world, we have multiple aspects of the business that need constant oversight and attention, for myself to assign someone for the task is achievable however it comes at a cost to the business, we as a business do not specialize in the trading of shares or have a platform capable of doing so (at the moment) so the best solution is to operate using the platforms available to us. Do things need to change surrounding these platforms? YES they do, whilst we are investigating the matter in great detail we cannot provide a solution overnight.
so, basically, they failed to plan.
basically humans are animals too
...they seem to have been blindsided by an obvious upcoming issue.
yep. applies to other issuers and in general - everybody btw.
I agree. Do you have a system in place for direct shares?
The reasoning behind using a platform and not direct handling of shares for ourselves is down to the man hours required to operate on such a basis, we are operating in the real world, we have multiple aspects of the business that need constant oversight and attention, for myself to assign someone for the task is achievable however it comes at a cost to the business, we as a business do not specialize in the trading of shares or have a platform capable of doing so (at the moment) so the best solution is to operate using the platforms available to us. Do things need to change surrounding these platforms? YES they do, whilst we are investigating the matter in great detail we cannot provide a solution overnight.
so, basically, they failed to plan.
Exactly, a buy back looks to be the only option if they do not wish to handle direct shares. For such a 'mature' BTC operation, they seem to have been blindsided by an obvious upcoming issue.
I agree. Do you have a system in place for direct shares?
The reasoning behind using a platform and not direct handling of shares for ourselves is down to the man hours required to operate on such a basis, we are operating in the real world, we have multiple aspects of the business that need constant oversight and attention, for myself to assign someone for the task is achievable however it comes at a cost to the business, we as a business do not specialize in the trading of shares or have a platform capable of doing so (at the moment) so the best solution is to operate using the platforms available to us. Do things need to change surrounding these platforms? YES they do, whilst we are investigating the matter in great detail we cannot provide a solution overnight.
so, basically, they failed to plan.
Jump to: