Damn, too bad about BitFunder. Amazing how not one but two major disruptions have now occurred during this IPVO!
Then again, after BTC-TC shuttered (presumably from SEC pressure) it seemed pretty within the realm of possibility that other exchanges would try to distance themselves from US customers. One would hope that TAT and cryptocyprus have held this in the back of their minds as well and have been at least thinking about different contingency plans if the need should arise.
Lots of NEOBEE panic selling right now on BitFunder, likely due to US customers quickly divesting. But this seems very premature. I hope TAT and/or cryptocyprus can tell us soon how they plan to proceed, I will look forward to their announcement. In the meantime, we can start discussing about the merits various contingency plans.
As I see it, converting BitFunder shares to Havelock shares for US persons (or just persons who wish to retain more anonymity), or migrating old BTC-TC shares to Havelock for these persons, seems somewhat unwise perhaps. Who's to say that Havelock won't be the next exchange to require that their customers prove they are not American? Perhaps there just isn't a safe haven right now. If migrating to Havelock *is* what TAT/cryptocyprus recommend for US persons or anonymity-conscious persons who don't wish to divest, perhaps the 1 BTC exchange transfer fee could at least be reduced or eliminated temporarily as these are unique circumstances.
Maybe the best solution right now would be to let people convert to direct shares though. I think this is a good solution for US persons or anonymity-conscious persons who think they'd like to hold onto shares more long-term. Direct shares do have the disadvantage of lower liquidity (as it's more cumbersome to sell them), but I think the direct shares probably can just be a holding pattern for now. In time, it should be possible to migrate these shares to newer, and better securities exchange systems when they are developed (like a distributed, coloured coin-based platform, for instance).
How about it, TAT and cryptocyprus? Can direct shares be another option for now? Anyone with shares on BitFunder would simply need to sign a message using their public BTC address in order to demonstrate ownership.
I guess on the positive side, all these troublesome developments are occurring before dividends have started to roll in. That would probably complicate matters a lot more. Let's hope we can arrive at a more permanent solution for share issuing before all the real fun begins.