Topic: [IPVO] [Multiple Exchanges] Neo & Bee - LMB Holdings - page 52. (Read 658701 times)

They did indicate that the fee might not apply for smaller shareholders (less then 1000 shares)

Yup.  Got it.  Thanks.  You have a nice day now... 

The fee is 0.2btc.

 

Thanks... really, though, you need and we all need to stop acting like dicks. 

 

The information is badly written.  I thought the fee was .2.   Whatever.  But the 1 BTC fee is never explained well. 

So, shit on your customers and again make the BTC scene one less bit professional. 

 

The only "jibe" was at Arwell for inciting people by leaving details out of his quote. The rest of my comment is short, not out of disrespect, but because emotion has no place in this kind of thing.

It's important to me that people perform due diligence as best they can, but it is not important to me to value likability above that. I've done my best to develop a reputation by being one of the only rocks in the storm during BTCT and Bitfunder's closings, representing on the ASICMINER board, using XBOND to help fund projects like Neo while rendering bondholders whole, pushing Havelock to improve standards and protocols, and reliably providing what I've offered to provide.

I don't want anyone to trust me because I say what they want to hear, or because I speak in ways people are most comfortable with. Trust is earned, not proclaimed.

Your additional question again shows you did not read up, so I continue to have reason to be concerned.

"There is no minimum quantity for transfers, but any transfer order must pay the current service fee. (2/1/2014: Fee is currently 0.2btc, and may never exceed 1.0btc)"

To reword it, any transfer of shares from Havelock to LMB currently requires a 0.2btc service fee. The quantity of shares transferred is not a factor, only the quantity of requests.

Why is there a fee? Because there are notable monthly fees to have a listing on Havelock and transfers are an optional service that carries a burden of time, responsibility and risk. Also note that whenever a shareholder has been stuck or stranded, I provided free accommodations in the past. I know we are in a culture of advertising-supported free services, but that is unhealthy, and this is not one of them.

For those wondering:

http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/thick+as+thieves

While I agree with you about the TAT tag (why should any of us trust a guy with "thieves" in their name? ) I think all this situation required was that you did a bit of reading instead of cluttering the thread... with regards to the work TAT does, I and many others think it's invaluable and if you don't like it, don't buy into it. If you are going to play the game of telling people what their job is, yours, sir, is due dilligence as pointed out above

I am not writing about share price often, but ...



0.006 Ahoy !  

The current transfer fee is 0.2BTC.

Thanks... and that little jibe at the end about my misunderstanding of the exchange fees was just what I would expect from an amateur.  Any hope... really, man.  You're the poor joe who's running around doing IPO's with a tag like 'Thick as Thieves.'  Jeez...  It's your job to answer questions politely.  And really, if I want to transfer 100 shares to direct - how much will it cost me?  .2 BTC?  1 BTC? 

It's amazing any of us are even solvent at this point.  

I find it unsettling that they will not be given the time to get the business up and running and prove that they actually can make a profit first.
It has been three days since they opened their first branch, let's not forget that.

This would not have been possible without the IPO investors either.

lol, jerk!

Thanks.

Arwell's quote inexplicably excludes the current transfer fee of 0.2btc (1btc is the max price, created when bitcoin was worth much less).

In addition to any backups Havelock does internally, the full shareholder list is sent to each issuer twice per day.

I suggest reading the entire Havelock description AND the entire LMB prospectus before buying.

All your questions have been addressed and answered numerous times in the past. And most are answered in the documents I noted.

Also read this thread from the beginning, etc.

This is due diligence, and you must do it to have any hope of understanding what this is.

I, for one, would like an explanation for the extremely large 'service fee.'  1 BTC?  

Also, I'd like some explanation of the Havelock backup procedure.  Burnside said that BTCT emailed friedcat every 12 hours, the email address and a BTC address of every Asicminer shareholder.

Something like that would be very comforting.  The community is butt-sore!  

Should you be investing if you are unwilling or unable to do simple research?

TAT is 100% trustworthy.

And what was the fee for transfer.
Is this real? "There is no minimum quantity for transfers, but any transfer order must pay a 1.0 Bitcoin service
fee" 1BTC service fee?

you don't have to trust it, only tat can actually transfer the shares.
The only thing you are risking is for someone to know your email address 

anyway I used this method to transfer my shares from bitfunder and btct   to Havelock
and I will use it again to move them to LMB-holdings  (I am hodling these stocks)

I would really like this, and asked about it some time ago:


To which Danny "answered" (he's very good at this political speak, making you believe he has answered your question, when he has infact not)


EDIT: I DO find it amusing and unsettling that they still haven't hired a full-time bitcoin core developer, being that every bit of profit they'll ever make wouldn't have been possible without those developers

Sorry for asking... but can i trust a gmail adress?