Nakedness is somewhat popular in my local when someone can't handle the heat of being drunk.
There are reasons why patrollers or the casino management aren't too strict imposing penalties to these people. It's because they can potentially lose a client and if that guy is known to be a big time gambler to them, they will just let it pass and call that a day.
Yes, just reminded me a few days ago about a story, I personally didn't witnessed it. But I have a buddy who is somewhat close to a whales in land based casinos. It's not about nakedness or something. But one thing you says about losing a potential client. And so this big whales can command the casino itself if he wanted to ban someone. The story goes that this whales bet a huge amount in a baccarat game and someone goes on and bet against him with just like less than $100 and this guy won. The big whales was so mad that he ask the casino to ban this guy for good. Again, this is just a story that circulated, I was not there, but I know that this high rollers and big whales can do that because the casinos doesn't want to lose their big clients.
If that person was a VIP member of a casino and went crazy like that guy, it was likely the casino would just let it slide. Casinos certainly don't want to lose VIP members who often spend large sums of money gambling and will choose to do nothing. And if it's true that the man was drugged until he was unconscious and did that, it would be embarrassing for the man. And he could have held the casino accountable because someone drugged him. And when a person is drugged, he doesn't know what he's done, and perhaps that's what happened to that guy. But we don't know what the next story will be.
Well, A VIP member of a casino that behaved the way that guy behaved, i trust will be given just same treatment as the guy was given initially, that is, having security men take him away from the public there, the only thing i believe is that the casino might not press charges against him, and for this particular incident, we were not told whether the casino pressed charges against the dude or not.
And talking about being drugged, due to how everything happened or played out, I don't think the dude have any right to press charges against the casino even though he was drugged in the casino, according to the story, the casino didn't give him a drink, and no body in the casino gave him drink, what the story told us is that, the dude took a leftover drink belonging to some one who already left the casino, and drank, and some minutes after drinking, he started misbehaving, that is clearly not the fault of the casino, why would he want to hold the casino accountable for such when it is not the casino or any present customer in the casino that gave him what he drank?