Topic: Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020? Thus do we need anonymity? (Read 102759 times)

Yes we need anonymity but in case of legal actions all bank account must be transparent in the face of the law. In our country there was a bank secrecy law that even the banks cannot expose the transactions made by their clients to the government authorities for legal purposes. Big syndicates find this as a haven for their profits since it is hidden by the banks in secrecy thus bank secrecy law must be conditional and will be deemed invalid for the pursuit of legality and truth.

As far as our money is concerned we always need anonymity.

What Pyrrhic satisfaction do you gain from the fact that the thread asks a question about the likelihood of the coming global collapse overshooting into MadMax? A question is not a prediction.

We are definitely heading into a hornet's nest as Kissinger is advising Trump to shift policy towards Russia to drive a wedge between Russia and China and push China's economic rebalancing into a flash crash and destabilize SE Asia:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17603443
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17601898

This is coupled with Armstrong's short dollar vortex theme of international capital flow stampeding into the dollar which is well underway since before 2015.75 and is fomenting phase transition liftoff here in 2017 with ETA no later than 2018.


You've have to come up some excuse as to why I have lab tests and medical documentation of my illness. How do you explain welts that would suddenly appear on the back of my skull after eating which was the autoimmune illness ostensibly brought on by the chronic, disseminated TB infection which had infected also my abdomen and intestine (which is very common in autopsies wherein there is an active TB infection of the lung which I am confirmed to have on an xray and which I have had for many years).

Lying is what you do. I have seen you do it so many times, I wonder how you still have any credibility.

Fuck man, you don't know me if you think I would cry about some non-existent illness. I survived something you can't even begin to fathom. Love to see you suffer TB for several years so you could walk in the shoes of another man who is actually very strong and very much a fighter.

I am not going to waste my time on you. You are scum of the earth as evident by your debating tactics in every exchange I have ever seen you engage (and not only with me).


Well either you are ignorant or you've lied again.

The US Fed had begun raising rates.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/bonds/us-30-year-bonds-the-party-is-over/  <--- from Dec. 6, 2016


Continue lying, but it only causes your credibility to continue to decline with anyone who takes to the time to actually review my record.

I already explained to you above, that the theme and predictions have not been incorrect. You choose to lie and debate disingenuously as you always do when you are incorrect.


You are scum.  I do hope we meet face-to-face one day. You are loud mouth who can talk a bunch of shit from behind a keyboard. Let's see if you can do it to my face.

Title of this thread, created by one of your schizophrenic socks:

Is a Madmax outcome coming before 2020?



Even if for the sake of argument I accede to your twist on Munchhausen syndrome (which I know full well is part of the New Age Hustle Pro Version), you still have to explain why, well over a year after the date you predicted, there is no sign of interest rates having peaked.

You made an incorrect prediction (among many others) and have to own that.

"But Muh Tuberculosis & Delirium" isn't a valid excuse, even if you purport it to be an explanation for your failed doomsday newsletter propheteering.

Your 2015.75 prediction was strictly speaking incorrect on Jan 1 2016, and now (a year later) there's no wiggle room for you left.

Squirm all you like.  Allude to whatever real and imagined maladies afflict you.  You are just another failed doomsday prophet.  And you will still be a failed doomsday prophet in 2021, when we fail to harvest methane from pig farms and fight to the death in Thunderdomes (not saying Tina Turner won't be running things in 2021 though  ).

Stop lying about what is quoted above. I see 2017 in the quote. I don't see anything about 2020 above.

All I see if there is a missing word "after" in between 'peak' and '2015.75', which is everyone knows from reading me I often accidently elide intended words. Just go read a lot of my prose. For cripes sake, I had Tuberculosis for the past several years and delirium. I am allowed to miss type a word. It is clear from the context what I was intending.

First you make specific, falsifiable claims about 2015.75.

When those claims are not borne out by actual events, you move the goalposts to 2017.

And now that it's actually 2017, you're ready to slide them further down the field to 2020.

That's not rational empiricism.  You're "Manipulating Facts to Fit a Theory."

You've abandoned the scientific method and regressed to the superstitious voodoo of primitive witch doctors.

You probably thought Brexit would fail and Hillary would win.

Treasury bonds did not peak in 2015.75.  No amount of spin and poutrage will change that simple fact. 

Treasury bonds did not peak in 2015.75.  YOU.  WERE.  WRONG.

Don't quote me out-of-context:


The transition was delayed into the timeframe presented (although Putin entered the Syrian theater officially on Oct 1, 2015 precisely on schedule so the BIG BANG did start right on time). And yes the Tbonds have finally peaked as the Fed has begun raising rates and the strong dollar vortex is underway with the comicotant rise in the USA stock market and the decline in gold. He even precisely called the deadcat bounce to $1362 for gold and recently the deadcat bounce to $1221.

STFU mofo.

And you are eliding my numerous other predictions and Armstrong's numerous other predictions which were spot on.

True or False:


Here, I'll even spoon-feed you in easy to understand graphical format the required empirical data necessary to determine the accuracy of your prediction.



If you can't evaluate the truth or falsity of your claim, you are not an empiricist and thus should not present yourself as one.

But that shouldn't surprise anyone, because I called you out as a charlatan, numerologist, and eschatologist ages ago.

I learned the New Age Hustle from the very best.  Your sperging doesn't amount to a small black hair growing out of a tiny mole on his ass.

Try harder and do better.  You are boring us.

Except that iCEBREAKER just lied. Armstrong has continued to be correct. Readers can visit the Martin Armstrong thread in the Economics forum for much discussion of the details.

My numerous correct predictions and even the documentation of how I called the bottom of Monero and precisely when to buy before the blast off in price. It is all there in the Martin Armstrong thread.

No doubt iCEBREAKER will continue to lie, because that is what he does.

Another thread of proof to refute his lies about my record on predictions:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/speculation-rule-buy-when-others-are-irrationally-pessimistic-or-too-cautious-1663070

*Le Two Years Later*

So much for Shelby and Martinfoil's "Treasury bonds to peak 2015.75, then we enter the BIG BANG of sovereign debt collapse" predictions.

Over a year later, they look like doom-mongering chumps.

And I've grown rich thanks to Monero.

Too bad all-wise all-knowing Shelby outsmarted himself and didn't get 0.1% of Monero when he had the chance and I strongly recommended he do so.

Shelby is always wrong about everything, and that's OK.  My problem is him still having the unmitigated gall to consider himself an empiricist with predictive skills superior to my own, despite having embraced so many failed models and eschewing so many successful ones.

One thing I don't understand is that if a "madmax outcome" happens, (a complete breakdown of society) then why would one need anonymity? There would be no records or social infrastructure to support it. What you would need is calories, not anonymity.

brought to you by congress and the civilian admin. some paid to see that happens, but no one was forced to accept the briberies... it may seem unfair to the "cops", but you have to understand it's part of the way of life under your watch... shouldn't but what can you do? it ain't the law that stop the bad man from accepting the corruptions, for those offering it's a question of financial survival, otherwise some one else will do it and succeed... (experimental food producing systemic pesticide in the fibers directly and they made it safe, ie legal - a plant of the early hours of the creation, unsafe ie illegal). Political integrity comes from law enforcement (and the pressure of the legion, and when they cross bye bye "cops"), however when the police state emerges, you get the worst, time for the military dictatorship (ain't bad, just a wording for restoring some sanity, but it can too goes out of hand, but food cleanness around the country has always been a priority for said gov, soldiers come from across the land and maybe one day be the supreme soviet ).

what is sad is that most Americans will never realize that they went trough a battlefield, the homefront is so foggy for them, they can't even see the in-motion, who cares, as long as the f.o.g. is before the foes eyes.

edit: what's the role of the fence on the second pic?

What the rest of the USA may be going through from 2017 - 2024. This is how it changes. And nobody anticipates it.

Cross-posting from rpietila's speculation thread...


Nestmann's logic appears to be flawed, because:

http://www.epi.org/publication/retirement-inequality-chartbook/


Governments typically force all retirement funds to invest in sovereign bonds during a sovereign bond or fiscal crisis, e.g. afair Poland and Argentina have already nationalized the pensions.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/09/18/pending-pension-crisis-they-are-only-a-promise/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/09/22/pension-funds-being-taken-to-fund-infrastructure/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/01/29/cycles-obamas-tax-free-bonds/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/12/14/the-three-bombshells-tucked-inside-the-continuing-resolution-to-fund-the-govt/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/693-2/2012-2/obamacare-the-investment-tax/

Armstrong is predicting the European stock markets will peak before the USA does. USA prediction is probably 2017, so it looks like Europe to peak in 2015 (or 2016?). There is a Panic cycle for the German DAX week of April 13, which is also a Long-term and Trading signal (see the computer generated trading model chart).

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2015/02/18/are-we-headed-into-a-european-equity-bubble/

Here is a link to a very important post on the coming Mad Max cycle and shift from West to Asia:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10493898

---

MaidSafe's design concept is nearly useless.

Nothing is going to beat Maidsafe for anonimity when it comes out. Too bad is bubbled as fuck now and can't properly invest.

OMG 70% tax

Where do you live???

And I thought things were bad enough here

I am not thrilled to quote this Graham Summers who I followed in 2012 and managed to lose $75,000, but this article is correct:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-16/end-global-debt-system-approaches

This is what Armstrong's October 2015 Sovereign Debt Big Bang is all about.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2015/02/17/ratio-analysis-the-other-side-of-2015-75/


2016 is when the TBTFs (Too Big To Fail) fail. 

Armstrong spells out exactly why the one world currency must come:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2015/02/15/setting-the-stage-for-the-one-world-currency/

And the video of him predicting the end of the Swiss peg before it was abandoned:

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2015/02/15/berlin-conference-the-swiss-peg-will-go/

More of his predictions alluded to in a trailer to the Forecaster biography:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MP2QaT2A_A