Pages:
Author

Topic: is advertising for ICOs unethical? - page 2. (Read 13805 times)

hero member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 582
"CoinPoker.com"
May 04, 2019, 05:58:59 AM
Yes I think this is unethical. You don't have to spend 9M$ for promotion. That is not practical. In my own opinion we don't have any expensive promotions because the best way to market ICO and other crypto is the success of the investors coming from crypto or ICO. When it happen we don't have to pay any advertisement.
ICO made more than $22 billion only in the US in 2018 and a big number of ICO had been scams which mean that people lost their money for a white paper which is simply pathetic. ICO is no longer the point of attraction for the potential investors who are looking from profits by investing in early tokens. They have started targeting IEOs. The only option open to ICO is to promote but I fear if promotion would do any good.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500
May 03, 2019, 10:17:23 PM
I've noticed many ICOs have to spend a lot of money on promotions and advertising.

For example, let's say an ICO raises 10 million dollars but has to spend 9 million on promotion.

Therefore, they only really raised 1 million for the project.

Isn't this unethical?

If you're starting a company and looking for investors the traditional way via stock equity, you would never spend 9 million or even 5 million or even 2 million in order to raise 10 million from investors.

This begs the question, what ratio of promotion cost versus funds raised for ICOs is ethical?

And how do we know if an ICO is using an ethical ratio?



I have not seen a real project pouring 90% of their money into advertising, all of which must pay at least 35% for product development and 10-15% for the team. So at least 50% of the money needed to maintain the project is needed, there are no projects that need a lot of money to advertise as you said.
member
Activity: 700
Merit: 10
May 03, 2019, 09:26:40 PM
I've noticed many ICOs have to spend a lot of money on promotions and advertising.

For example, let's say an ICO raises 10 million dollars but has to spend 9 million on promotion.

Therefore, they only really raised 1 million for the project.

Isn't this unethical?

If you're starting a company and looking for investors the traditional way via stock equity, you would never spend 9 million or even 5 million or even 2 million in order to raise 10 million from investors.

This begs the question, what ratio of promotion cost versus funds raised for ICOs is ethical?

And how do we know if an ICO is using an ethical ratio?



I dont think ICOs have 90% marketing budget for the project. If the project are legit, mostly the budget not more than 10% and big portion for developing the project. I dont think advertising ICOs is unethical because it about to attracting more investor
member
Activity: 602
Merit: 10
May 03, 2019, 08:14:34 PM
Is there so much money needed for promotion? I don't think all projects spend 90% of the money they get just to do promotions because as we know some projects even large projects can succeed only by doing promotions on forums and other platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, Blogspot and Telegram
it does not require large funds but they can still be successful, the main reason is because this forum, this forum is a place for investors so that when someone can take advantage of this forum well he has done the right promotion

Most project allocating token not more than 10% from their total supply. This forum used for new project to promote because crypto investor must be looking on this forum. I think thats why many new ICOs make bounty campaign to promote the project through this forum or social media because its more cheap and more effective
jr. member
Activity: 198
Merit: 2
May 03, 2019, 07:42:41 PM
How come you know about the particular amount spent for advertising, that can be. Promoting projects can be one of the best step to take to earn more money and people to know your business so nothing bad promoting, and those mediums used have no problem at times because he creates them to earn..
jr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 1
May 03, 2019, 07:26:06 PM
There are quite some good number of ICOs that only use their tokens are means of payment to those who advertised for them. Therefore, with that, it is more or less like not spending anything on it or at most, they pay out negligible amount of fund for such purpose. Another cost effective means some of them use is also through bounty campaigns.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 791
Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈
May 03, 2019, 07:12:13 PM
Is there so much money needed for promotion? I don't think all projects spend 90% of the money they get just to do promotions because as we know some projects even large projects can succeed only by doing promotions on forums and other platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, Blogspot and Telegram
it does not require large funds but they can still be successful, the main reason is because this forum, this forum is a place for investors so that when someone can take advantage of this forum well he has done the right promotion
full member
Activity: 706
Merit: 111
May 03, 2019, 06:59:53 PM
I've noticed many ICOs have to spend a lot of money on promotions and advertising.

For example, let's say an ICO raises 10 million dollars but has to spend 9 million on promotion.

Therefore, they only really raised 1 million for the project.

Isn't this unethical?

If you're starting a company and looking for investors the traditional way via stock equity, you would never spend 9 million or even 5 million or even 2 million in order to raise 10 million from investors.

This begs the question, what ratio of promotion cost versus funds raised for ICOs is ethical?

And how do we know if an ICO is using an ethical ratio?




Who is going to spend 9 million on promotion if they only need 10 million to raise?Huh You don't need to spend that much on promotion or advertising.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 10
May 03, 2019, 06:40:57 PM
Advertising engine of progress. The competition in the world of cryptocurrency is very high and in order for as many people as possible to know about your project you need to spend a lot of money on advertising. Without advertising, you will not be able to talk about your project.
newbie
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
May 03, 2019, 06:00:33 PM
Marketing is everywhere in the real world. I don't think advertising for ICOs is unethical per se. It all depends on how it's done. Is it disclosed? Is it for a shit project? Do you believe in it? So many influencers are putting on fake smiles on while they shill projects they do not believe in just to milk their followers’ hard earned money. At GAINS, we only promote projects we believe in. You can talk to us and we're always here to answer. We're here for the long run. At the beginning, we even uploaded our IDs online to show people we can be trusted. We're not random handles with a funny avatar that can hide anywhere in the world. We are real, traceable people. And we are trying to build something great Smiley But that's a lot of ranting. Find the links below if you want to take a look at what we do and join our community!

We also host quizzes in which our members can win hundreds of dollars in tradable tokens ->

🚨 More giveaways coming. And this time, you won't believe it... You'll have an opportunity to win tokens of an IEO! 🚨

👊 This is the first quiz for an IEO in the history of crypto and we are very honored to pioneer it and get to claim this milestone! You know we bring you the best.

🔥🔥 Evedo Quiz on Saturday 4th of May 🔥🔥

ℹ️ Evedo is a blockchain based platform, consisting of B2B & B2C Marketplaces. It unifies all businesses and participants involved in organizing events. Their aim is to build a marketplace and a true ecosystem that will help the $850+ Billion event industry grow by connecting all parties without unnecessary middlemen.

🚀 When you think about how hard it is to organize an event with so many parties involved: ground planning for permits, booking agents, artist management, stage construction, stage lighting, electricity, beverage companies, emergency services and security services just to name a few... Then you begin to understand why Evedo can help smooth out this strenuous process 😉

💰 Research the project and compete to win 1 ETH worth of tokens per question!

✅ There will be between 5 and 8 questions. The best answers will be selected by the team.

🌐 Evedo's website (https://www.evedo.co/) 🌐 

💬 Join their Telegram group (https://t.me/evedoco) to learn more about the project.

🕑 The quiz will start in GAINS Quizzes (https://t.me/GainsQuizzes) Saturday the 4th of May at 18h UTC+2.

😎 Do your research 📚 and see you there for a fun event! May the best win 🏆

🔹Another day, another opportunity to win hundreds of dollars worth of tokens with GAINS.

This is all real, no scam. We've been thriving with our amazing community for nearly a year and a half now. Come check it out.
Main channels:
Telegram Community - https://t.me/GainsChat
Telegram Announcements - https://t.me/GainsANN
Telegram Quizzes - https://t.me/GainsQuizzes
Twitter - https://twitter.com/GainsAssociates
Discord - Discord - https://discord.gg/WebCxR3
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 256
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 03, 2019, 05:32:23 PM
If they really used so much money on advertising is unetchical and also if the project fail is a problem and the team should always think for long time and not put a lot of money on advertising, they should create something new which can make a project be successfull.
Promotion is a must to which there must be mutual development. There are projects that focus completely on promotion without a product and gains a good investment, and finally when launched it goes worth nothing leaving back a loss to all the investors. One such project that I participated and supported is the earth token which had a big hype and finally when listed the price went from $0.05 to $0.00015, no use of holding it anymore.
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 10
Decentralized Continuous Audit& Reporting Protocol
May 03, 2019, 05:26:27 PM
No project will invest all the monies generated from ICO for advertisement. Also I don't think there is ethical and unethical advertisement ratio, it all depends on the team and how far they want things to reach. But I think every expenditure is budgeted for initially so that there is always no doubt in the air.
hero member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 516
May 03, 2019, 05:13:51 PM
If they really used so much money on advertising is unetchical and also if the project fail is a problem and the team should always think for long time and not put a lot of money on advertising, they should create something new which can make a project be successfull.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
May 03, 2019, 01:25:17 PM
Yes I think this is unethical. You don't have to spend 9M$ for promotion. That is not practical. In my own opinion we don't have any expensive promotions because the best way to market ICO and other crypto is the success of the investors coming from crypto or ICO. When it happen we don't have to pay any advertisement.
Of course, if you take into account advertising that is paid for in real and big business, then these are really hundreds of millions of dollars.  But if you take into account the Bounty company, through which hunters advertise certain Eco companies, the prices are almost ridiculous.  It is a pity that recently the ico market of companies has been greatly deceiving Not only the investor, but also the Bounty Hunters.  I think if IEO succeeds in taking root in the cryptocurrency market, then the company's ico market may be in danger of disappearing.
hero member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 582
"CoinPoker.com"
May 03, 2019, 07:13:09 AM
I've noticed many ICOs have to spend a lot of money on promotions and advertising.

For example, let's say an ICO raises 10 million dollars but has to spend 9 million on promotion.

Therefore, they only really raised 1 million for the project.

Isn't this unethical?

If you're starting a company and looking for investors the traditional way via stock equity, you would never spend 9 million or even 5 million or even 2 million in order to raise 10 million from investors.

This begs the question, what ratio of promotion cost versus funds raised for ICOs is ethical?

And how do we know if an ICO is using an ethical ratio?



How can you precisely say that they have been using such an high amount for promotion and advertisement. I don't think that is the case.
Only if the project is scam then they initially tend to spend a lot or they spend just a fraction.
I believe that a project with strong background will never need to advertise and spend millions on it. Look at Tesla who stopped spending millions of dollars on advertisement and instead started improving their infrastructure which paid off. I think that these days, a project with great potential will go for IEO and not for ICO and IEO exchange take care of the advertisement. IEO that have been conducted on Binance Launchpad have achieved the hard cap successfully every time.
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 100
May 03, 2019, 05:42:09 AM
Yes I think this is unethical. You don't have to spend 9M$ for promotion. That is not practical. In my own opinion we don't have any expensive promotions because the best way to market ICO and other crypto is the success of the investors coming from crypto or ICO. When it happen we don't have to pay any advertisement.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 12
May 03, 2019, 04:45:38 AM
That is not our call to make and no matter how much you complained its developers call to make ,they know what's best for there projects either they succeed or not,its just a shame what ICO projects are turning into these days ,they raised all that huge money and in the end for nothing, I guess they are just making themselves rich is all
full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 106
homt.net
May 03, 2019, 04:35:07 AM
I've noticed many ICOs have to spend a lot of money on promotions and advertising.

For example, let's say an ICO raises 10 million dollars but has to spend 9 million on promotion.

Therefore, they only really raised 1 million for the project.

Isn't this unethical?

If you're starting a company and looking for investors the traditional way via stock equity, you would never spend 9 million or even 5 million or even 2 million in order to raise 10 million from investors.

This begs the question, what ratio of promotion cost versus funds raised for ICOs is ethical?

And how do we know if an ICO is using an ethical ratio?


Do you think that they spent such money for advertising? I am not sure about that. Imagine that most of them do not have enough money for development, why then they would spend money for something that is not really necessary? If they have enough money, why they would need money, when they have enough, if you know what I mean.  Grin
full member
Activity: 1386
Merit: 101
ComboLabs
May 03, 2019, 04:29:49 AM
I've noticed many ICOs have to spend a lot of money on promotions and advertising.

For example, let's say an ICO raises 10 million dollars but has to spend 9 million on promotion.

Therefore, they only really raised 1 million for the project.

Isn't this unethical?

If you're starting a company and looking for investors the traditional way via stock equity, you would never spend 9 million or even 5 million or even 2 million in order to raise 10 million from investors.

This begs the question, what ratio of promotion cost versus funds raised for ICOs is ethical?

And how do we know if an ICO is using an ethical ratio?




I just want to know where you gather information like you say?
we know that ico requires and is big for every marketing plan and management.
but I think what you say is not right, because surely the developer has a team to interpret each expenditure and income in a project.
copper member
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
May 03, 2019, 04:16:55 AM
I've noticed many ICOs have to spend a lot of money on promotions and advertising.

For example, let's say an ICO raises 10 million dollars but has to spend 9 million on promotion.

Therefore, they only really raised 1 million for the project.

Isn't this unethical?

If you're starting a company and looking for investors the traditional way via stock equity, you would never spend 9 million or even 5 million or even 2 million in order to raise 10 million from investors.

This begs the question, what ratio of promotion cost versus funds raised for ICOs is ethical?

And how do we know if an ICO is using an ethical ratio?



I guess it is unethical because they should be spending their money raised into their product and not into the advertisements. It is better to have a product working than no product and pure advertisements.
Pages:
Jump to: