Topic: Is Ashish Gulhati, et al., Satoshi Nakamoto? - page 4. (Read 28669 times)
One counter-evidence: Satoshi seemed to be a Windows programmer, rather than a Linux programmer(which I don't think is an identity he needs to hide, after all there too many out there fit this stereotype)
Unless the guy totally matured at some point to become someone capable of doing what Satoshi did then maybe. But with a twitter handle like an4rky I highly doubt it.
A good effort I think. But I highly doubt this guy is Satoshi. He appears to have a totally different personality.
No way in hell would someone like this sit on all those mined coins and not convert a single satoshi into fiat.
No way in hell would someone like this sit on all those mined coins and not convert a single satoshi into fiat.
ROFLMMFAO!!!
Quote
Between sessions at MFC’s...
I wouldn't change a word. I pitty the souls trying to figure out what MFC is/was years from now.
Gammar alert! (minor--one too many spaces, I believe):
Quote
...most elusive man/ collective on...
Ashish is not Satoshi, your very close with Adam Back, he probably knows Satoshi :-)
I've already shown that they've worked on HashCash together.
Ashish would be more versed in the backend of DMT by Grabbe then Adam.
Ashish is not Satoshi, your very close with Adam Back, he probably knows Satoshi :-)
https://twitter.com/adam3us
Satoshi's father was... (purposely didn't include the link, but...)
Quote
Adam Back
@adam3us
cryptographer, privacy enhancing tech, ecash, inventor of hashcash (bitcoin is hashcash extended with inflation control)
Malta · cypherspace.org
@adam3us
cryptographer, privacy enhancing tech, ecash, inventor of hashcash (bitcoin is hashcash extended with inflation control)
Malta · cypherspace.org
Satoshi's father was... (purposely didn't include the link, but...)
Quote
Founding Chair was a prominent development economist with the World Bank and Ministry of Finance, Government of India. He authored many books throughout his career...
I liked better the other Satoshi Nakamoto.You know the mathematician one from some days before.
He was THE S.N.
He was THE S.N.
Meng Weng Wong and I met Richard Stallman when I invited RMS to speak at our University. Professor Stallman turned 60 about a month ago.
Second page of an epic thread.
Second page of an epic thread.
Very nice deductions Phinnaeus 
Stumbled upon it by accident between sessions at MFCs.
Very nice deductions Phinnaeus
Proof that Ashish worked on Hashcash: http://web.archive.org/web/20070111153902/http://www.netropolis.org/hash/blog.cgi/About/CV.html?seemore=y
Quote
Code
Meng Weng Wong's TextAmp
Adam Back's HashCash
Meng Weng Wong's TextAmp
Adam Back's HashCash
Guess who lives in Melbourne, AU, and follows Bitcoin tweeps?
https://twitter.com/an4rky/followers
https://twitter.com/an4rky/followers
Quote
an4rkyabout 7 hours ago
RT @maxkeiser: Bitcoin doesn't support crime, bitcoin was invented in reaction to massive crimes being committed by banks.
RT @maxkeiser: Bitcoin doesn't support crime, bitcoin was invented in reaction to massive crimes being committed by banks.
Quote
an4rkyabout 3 days ago
RT @kyachtic: did you know ... the #libertarian party now accepts #bitcoin?! check it out http://t.co/sJ2Kx4BA0M
RT @kyachtic: did you know ... the #libertarian party now accepts #bitcoin?! check it out http://t.co/sJ2Kx4BA0M
Quote
an4rkyabout 7 hours ago
RT @maxkeiser: Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme. Bitcoin was created to escape the Ponzi scheme that is the US dollar and other fiat (read: Ponzi) currencies.
RT @maxkeiser: Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme. Bitcoin was created to escape the Ponzi scheme that is the US dollar and other fiat (read: Ponzi) currencies.
Quote
RT @perrymetzger: #bitcoin tulip market now at $16.92 or so. Go lemmings go!
Reply Retweet Favorite More
11:20 AM - 4 Jun 11
Reply Retweet Favorite More
11:20 AM - 4 Jun 11
http://netrosnooper.software.informer.com/
http://articles.software.informer.com/earn-a-million-with-bitcoin.html
http://au.linkedin.com/in/agulhati
I'm afraid to connect any more dots, fearing I've discover that Josh Zerlan is Satoshi's PR guy. I've already found one post by Ashish that'll make Josh's vial rants acceptable at the Vatican, namely the cocksucker ones.
Quote
netrosnooper is developed by Netropolis. The most popular version of this product among our users is 2.0. The product will soon be reviewed by our informers.
http://articles.software.informer.com/earn-a-million-with-bitcoin.html
http://au.linkedin.com/in/agulhati
Quote
Ashish Gulhati
Chief Developer at Neomailbox and Owner, Netropolis Technologies
Chief Developer at Neomailbox and Owner, Netropolis Technologies
I'm afraid to connect any more dots, fearing I've discover that Josh Zerlan is Satoshi's PR guy. I've already found one post by Ashish that'll make Josh's vial rants acceptable at the Vatican, namely the cocksucker ones.
And yes, a person with an IQ of 180 would hide in plain sight: au.linkedin.com/in/agulhati
lol@ Google Glass
To show that Ashish was well aware of James Orlin Grabbe's DMT (Digital Monetary Trust), I offer up the following: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/silk-list/message/4857
The link above is dead, but... http://web.archive.org/web/20011201233333/http://www.zolatimes.com/V5.42/operation911.html
About DMT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Orlin_Grabbe#Digital_Monetary_Trust
The ONLY person at Camp LFC at that time (mid to late '99) able to put together the DMT was Ashish.
Quote
You're joking, right?
No. I admit I haven't really been following details of the alleged
evidence being produced in support of the idea that there were human
hijackers on board the plane, but the bits I did hear about - the
miraculous passport discovery, the arabic flight manuals, the
convenient co-incidence of the hijackers' bags not being put on the
flight - was all so obviously fabricated as to be insulting to the
intelligence of those who are expected to buy it.
I've heard of no really good evidence linking Osama to operation 911,
but a small thing like the lack of evidence isn't stopping the US from
bombing the fuck out of Afghanistan. Nor is there any evidence (I know
of) that the alleged terrorists used encryption or steganography to
aid in this operation, but that little detail isn't stopping US
congresscritters from pushing through draconian electronic
surveillance measures.
It's just as obvious that none of this is related to actually
combatting a terrorist threat, but is simply a way to distract
attention from irritating and unpatriotic things like evidence and
logic.
Add to this the fact that the US recently conducted successful tests
of unmanned trans-pacific flight using an aircraft with a wingspan
about the same as that of a 737, and alternate theories don't seem so
far fetched:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V5.42/operation911.html
No. I admit I haven't really been following details of the alleged
evidence being produced in support of the idea that there were human
hijackers on board the plane, but the bits I did hear about - the
miraculous passport discovery, the arabic flight manuals, the
convenient co-incidence of the hijackers' bags not being put on the
flight - was all so obviously fabricated as to be insulting to the
intelligence of those who are expected to buy it.
I've heard of no really good evidence linking Osama to operation 911,
but a small thing like the lack of evidence isn't stopping the US from
bombing the fuck out of Afghanistan. Nor is there any evidence (I know
of) that the alleged terrorists used encryption or steganography to
aid in this operation, but that little detail isn't stopping US
congresscritters from pushing through draconian electronic
surveillance measures.
It's just as obvious that none of this is related to actually
combatting a terrorist threat, but is simply a way to distract
attention from irritating and unpatriotic things like evidence and
logic.
Add to this the fact that the US recently conducted successful tests
of unmanned trans-pacific flight using an aircraft with a wingspan
about the same as that of a 737, and alternate theories don't seem so
far fetched:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V5.42/operation911.html
The link above is dead, but... http://web.archive.org/web/20011201233333/http://www.zolatimes.com/V5.42/operation911.html
About DMT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Orlin_Grabbe#Digital_Monetary_Trust
Quote
In November 1999, a series of articles in the Laissez Faire City Times presented the Digital Monetary Trust project, which was a proposed financial trust providing private, anonymous accounts for individuals and entities within the DMT system, in order to securely store anonymous capital or to make anonymous monetary transactions.
That is, the DMT will be in the business of providing privacy, and doing so in a cryptographical framework which provides a more solid basis for customer anonymity than the traditional ones of (allegedly) tight-lipped bankers or (often-leaky) banking secrecy laws.
—Orlin Grabbe
That is, the DMT will be in the business of providing privacy, and doing so in a cryptographical framework which provides a more solid basis for customer anonymity than the traditional ones of (allegedly) tight-lipped bankers or (often-leaky) banking secrecy laws.
—Orlin Grabbe
The ONLY person at Camp LFC at that time (mid to late '99) able to put together the DMT was Ashish.
http://iearobotics.com/alberto/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=teaching:beatufulcode.pdf
Imagine Ashish walking into Sonny's BFL's facility now seeing the same clusterfuck.
Quote
IN MID-1999 I FLEW TO COSTA RICA TO WORK WITH LAISSEZ FAIRE CITY, a group that was working to create software systems to help usher in a new era of individual sovereignty.
The group at LFC was working primarily to develop a suite of software designed to protect and enhance individual rights in the digital age, including easy-to-use secure email, online dispute mediation services, an online stock exchange, and a private asset trading and banking system. My interest in many of the same technologies had been piqued long ago by the cypherpunks list and Bruce Schneier’s Applied Cryptography (Wiley), and I’d already been working on prototype implementations of some of these systems.
The most fundamental of these were systems to deliver strong and usable communications privacy to just about everybody.
When I stepped into LFC’s sprawling “interim consulate” outside San José, Costa Rica, they had a working prototype of a secure webmail system they called MailVault. It ran on Mac OS 9, used FileMaker as its database, and was written in Frontier. Not at all the mix of technologies you’d want to run a mission-critical communications service on, but that’s what the programmers had produced.
It was no surprise the system crashed early and often, and was extremely fragile. It could hardly support two concurrent users. LFC was facing a credibility crisis with its investors, as their software releases had been delayed many times, and their first beta of MailVault, the flagship product, was no gem. So in the free time left over from my contract network and system administration work at LFC, I started writing a new secure mail system from scratch.
This system is now named Cryptonite and has been in constant off-and-on development
and testing since then, in between other projects.
The first functioning prototype of Cryptonite was licensed to LFC as MailVault beta 2, and was open for testing in September 1999. It was the first OpenPGP-compatible webmail system available for public use and was almost immediately put to the test by LFC’s investors and beta testers. Since that time, Cryptonite has evolved in many ways through interaction with users, the open source community, and the market. While not an open source product itself, it has led to the development of numerous components I decided to release as open source along the way.
The group at LFC was working primarily to develop a suite of software designed to protect and enhance individual rights in the digital age, including easy-to-use secure email, online dispute mediation services, an online stock exchange, and a private asset trading and banking system. My interest in many of the same technologies had been piqued long ago by the cypherpunks list and Bruce Schneier’s Applied Cryptography (Wiley), and I’d already been working on prototype implementations of some of these systems.
The most fundamental of these were systems to deliver strong and usable communications privacy to just about everybody.
When I stepped into LFC’s sprawling “interim consulate” outside San José, Costa Rica, they had a working prototype of a secure webmail system they called MailVault. It ran on Mac OS 9, used FileMaker as its database, and was written in Frontier. Not at all the mix of technologies you’d want to run a mission-critical communications service on, but that’s what the programmers had produced.
It was no surprise the system crashed early and often, and was extremely fragile. It could hardly support two concurrent users. LFC was facing a credibility crisis with its investors, as their software releases had been delayed many times, and their first beta of MailVault, the flagship product, was no gem. So in the free time left over from my contract network and system administration work at LFC, I started writing a new secure mail system from scratch.
This system is now named Cryptonite and has been in constant off-and-on development
and testing since then, in between other projects.
The first functioning prototype of Cryptonite was licensed to LFC as MailVault beta 2, and was open for testing in September 1999. It was the first OpenPGP-compatible webmail system available for public use and was almost immediately put to the test by LFC’s investors and beta testers. Since that time, Cryptonite has evolved in many ways through interaction with users, the open source community, and the market. While not an open source product itself, it has led to the development of numerous components I decided to release as open source along the way.
Imagine Ashish walking into Sonny's BFL's facility now seeing the same clusterfuck.
You don't think that a guy with an IQ of 180 can think that far ahead and plant some false leads? LOL. He's pretty much a perfect fit in every way.
capable yes, but as said, it'd be a sacrilege... aren't you familiar with the FOSS crowd?
Jump to: