Those who are saying it's a scam, would you want your investment to be vulnerable to cyber attack? They are doing this to ensure security for our investment. Besides this we investors usually invest in the company and their products. So we should give the company enough time, freedom and our support to make the projects come to life.
Let me start by saying that I don't think ETN is a scam. But I DO think it's been so poorly managed that it's heading towards shitcoin territory for many. So many ETN believers are using this argument quoted above, rinse, repeat. well DUH, no one wants their investments to be vulnerable to cyber attacks.
But isn't this something that a team with this much experience should have anticipated BEFORE setting the launch date? Shouldn't they have tested and retested their system before shilling their product to record numbers of newcomers to the crypto scene? The 'official' line is that they shut down access to all the wallets because some of the investors - not all, some - had vulnerabilities with their passwords. Isn't this something they should have anticipated, since they marketed to newcomers to the scene?
Here is the FIRST line of their FAQ:
What is the purpose with this coin / what is so special about it?- It targets the masses, the people without knowledge of Cryptocurrency, now finally have a shot at obtaining one, without having to worry about wallets, mining rigs or setting up your computer with technical know-how just to mine, and keep the coins.
Guess what. They botched the launch, and now people DO have to worry about wallets and mining rigs and the technical shit, just to get a piece of the action. They botched the launch
to their target audience Also, for a company that's lauded for being so transparent or accessible, I find their marketing team very poor with follow-through. One update every few days isn't enough. They should be acknowledging that people are rightly unhappy with how this is turning out, and they should be making concrete steps to rectify that. Like institute a buy-back of the coins sold during the ICO for members of the community who want out. Or promise a bonus 'thank you for waiting' number of ETNs credited to each wallet. If they are confident the coin won't crash upon release, then they have nothing to lose by offering something like that.
Well put - mirrors pretty much how I am feeling.
As to the investors, well they are definitely this strongly, it's like Stockhold Syndrome to an extent - you see it all too often with Kickstarter/IndieGoGo too; if they admit they made a bad play then they cast doubt on themselves, and it's human nature to avoid that.
I also think their marketing team are a joke, it's just waffle on social media - it doesn't really tell you anything about anything.
However, I don't agree with handing out more tokens, that will only devalue things further. I also don't agree with having a massive pre-launch and then failing to do the most basic thing of protecting yourself from attack. And who exactly is claiming responsibility for this attack? Do we even know it occurred or is this more 'buying time' - sorry to be the cynic, but I feel as though the claim of an attack and the subsequent FUD is usually enough to give people breathing space while they assess options.
I will be genuinely interested if they reach their 1st-2nd week of December launch for the ICO wallets and the actual wallet app and then what happens after that. And also to add that 6 weeks in crypto time is eternity, in 6 weeks BTC has gone from nearly 5k at it's lowest to touching on 10k USD.