Might be a stupid theory but hear me out on this, we have the gamblers that bet on 1 million, half of them lose, half of them win,
From what I have read for many years, most people have lost at gambling compared to the people who have won. see this article for example:
Assuming rich people have more to lose and their share of the losses is bigger
Those who lose the most are poor people. Think about this scenario:
A person works in a company, earns $1000 in salary, at the end of the month pays all the bills and keeps $200, takes $50 and puts it in the bank. Every month this person saves 50$ in the bank, takes the 150$ and divides it for all the things related to the fun they want to do. This person plays with 50$ every month, once a week with 12.5$. There is $500 in that person's bank account
another person owns 5 companies, makes profits of $100,000 a day, makes profits of $3 million a month and when she pays all her bills she has $2 million, her bank account has more than $300 million . This person plays in casinos every day with 1000$ and loses every day, this person travels constantly, this person eats very well, this person is having fun every day.
Look, the poor person who earns $1000 a month, plays only once a week and has little money, works hard every day, has little time to have fun and at the end of the month his bank account goes up a little, but look In the case of the rich man, he has 5 companies, he gambles every day, he loses every day, he has fun every day and at the end of the month his bank account goes up a lot. rich always earn more
is this a form of wealth redistribution?
No, no chance of that being possible