Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 13. (Read 234759 times)

Unprecedented $1 Million Bounty For Hillary Clinton Medical Records


http://truepundit.com/true-pundit-unprecedented-1-million-bounty-for-hillary-clinton-medical-records/

I'm afraid this is the end of American democracy as we know it. There was no real choice and it's not a coincidence that it's Hillary or the end of civilization as we know it. It was planned, they promised her the presidency and they delivered

 
I think so 

Is smoking meth good for your teeth? 

A shit sandwich is a shit sandwhich, if im forced to eat it, i want to be entertained. Trump is a shit show id watch lol

to quote somethign i read on here before , "Shes a smaller bite of a shit sandwhich than trump is

There is no difference between them in the end. They are both just doing anything to get into Office. After watching a few Hillary documentaries I understood that the she is no different from any male politicans.

Well clearly with grammar like that your an immigrant, so it wouldn't be in your favor if trump wins but I here you brother . Iam trus hilary too!

i don't care about say much people bad about hilary clinton
iam trus hilary and i hope win in election US president

not really, but shes better than trump (her secret partner)

Hilary for prison 2016

I was just reading a bit about Clinton's tax returns which were just released.  To be honest, I figured that Clinton had already released her tax returns since there was so much about bloviating in the media about Trump's failure to do so.  I should have known better.

The word is that the Clintons were somewhat generous with respect to 'charitable donations', but the catch is that something like 95% of their 'giving' was to the 'Clinton Family Foundation'.  That is different from "William J. Clinton Foundation (Now known as the Clinton Foundation)", but the 'family foundation' which has not released their tax info this year has in years past donated to the 'Clinton Foundation'.  If people find this confusing it is probably not an accident.


If I were advising Trump, here would be several suggestions:

 - Make a joke about Clinton's 'charity' by counting out some money from one pocket and putting it in the other.

 - Call special attention to the recent Judicial Watch FOIA e-mails which make it abundantly clear that at least one of these foundations was a blatant pay-to-play influence peddling sham which leveraged Hillary's role as secretary of state.  God only knows what go on in the others.


With respect to Trump's own taxes:

 - Remind people that he is still under audit by Obama's IRS.  As many of Obama's political adversaries are personally aware, Obama's IRS is absolutely corrupt.  So much so that Lois Lerner had to 'lose' her e-mails just as did secretary Clinton, the EPA, etc, etc.

 - State that it is a joy to see how much his non-release is getting under the skin of the Dems that he is in no hurry.

She is as good or bad as Obama or Bill, she just is not as good as Bernie would have actually been.
But our question this year isnt whos the best man/women for the job its whos the smallest bite of shit sandwhich?

clearly Hillary is the smallest bite of shit sandwhich

I like the 'Hillary for Prision' meme well enough, but I like the new one just as well.  It's a little more humane and probably nearly as applicable.

Some very powerful words all true.

Lesson: Clinton has inherited the Republican money base, which means she is the candidate of the “bipartisan” moneyed classes, period.

She is the candidate of the imperial war machine, whose operatives have flocked to her corner in dread of Trump’s willingness to make “deals” with the Russians and Chinese. She is the candidate of multinational corporations, which are perfectly confident she is lying about her stance on TPP and other trade deals. And she is the candidate of the CIA and its fellow global outlaws, who will thrive as never before with a president in the White House who cackles “We came, we saw, he died” when the leader of an African country is murdered by Islamic jihadists supported by the United States.

“The Clinton ticket will outspend Trump by five to one, by far the widest margin in modern U.S. election history.”

The pestilence raging in Hillary’s Big Tent will inevitably lead to the death of millions, especially in Africa – and possibly of life on Earth.

The demons swarming in her entourage are real, proven evils – as is she. On foreign policy, Trump’s stated positions are far less aggressive -- yet, the “doomsday” scenario is successfully spun around his candidacy, not hers.

This is partly because Trump’s raging and racist white American nationalism makes him seem like the “type” that would nuke on impulse, despite his rather consistent calls for less confrontation in the world -- and even as Clinton promises to engage in new heights of provocation.

However, the main reason the smell of Armageddon clings to Trump’s candidacy, is that the corporate news media, as a sector, has coalesced behind Clinton (whose husband multiplied corporate media wealth with the Telecommunications Act of 1996). They, too, have squeezed into the Big Tent.

http://blackagendareport.com/hillary_big_nasty_tent

For politicians, trust them at your own peril because thats who they are. That trust is not found in their morality books because they will continue to betray that trust. Even the nomination she has secured, do one know the number of people she has betrayed to get that. In essence I would rather trust someone else or myself than any politician... MY opinion though...

She's not trustworthy, especially if you own something she's going to socialize it.

http://www.narrowpathnetwork.com/debt/hillary-clinton-the-coming-forced-socialism/

All Presidential politicians will inevitably be seen as untrustworthy somewhere in their journey.  It's not a platform that is kind to nuance.
A lot of people equate "trustworthiness" with stubbornness. We believe that if a person commits to courses of action, then they are probably reliable in some way. Hillary Clinton has committed to courses of action in the public eye many times, perhaps most notably when her husband's betrayal was made public, and she decided to stay in the marriage. We can rationally infer from actions like this that she is highly capable of being trustworthy.
 
The first paragraph still applies, though. Every politician will have their words and actions misconstrued intentionally by those attempting to malign them. Candidates will also change positions temporarily in order to garner votes. We know this, and it's not individual to Hillary Clinton. It's universal.

Hillary is experienced in selling out government for her own good, not that i try to defend Trump here. Iam glad that i never had to choose between plague and cholera