Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 7. (Read 234759 times)
What I wonder is if her daughter Chelsea be a candidate in the next two decades.It would be very interesting if she would continue the dynasty.
She isn't trustworthy, she straight up lies to her supporters and changes her stance which is usually negative initially to comfort the masses, its hard to trust her when she has a hard time getting a lot of things right until people correct her.
Plus the fact her campaign is 20% funded by Saudi Arabia and other nations including arms corporations, her being a warmonger and risking nuclear wars had she been elected would've probably been the end of a lot of people.
Plus the fact her campaign is 20% funded by Saudi Arabia and other nations including arms corporations, her being a warmonger and risking nuclear wars had she been elected would've probably been the end of a lot of people.
I believe that the real proportion is much more than 20%. A lot of the American corporations are owned by these Arabs from Qatar and Saudi Arabia (including mainstream media channels and newspapers). Hitlery got a lot of donations through them as well. If we add up these numbers, it will be much above 20%.
Heh I really dont understand this kind of question is Hillary Clinton Trustworty?? Really who likes her I think nobody so it is not neccesary question for me because most pupils here will say no because she dont want and dont know to make peace in world like Donald Trump and she is so bad talker and 100x much worse than Donald Trump and also Donald Trump have really good speaking funny skills which Hillary Clinton dont haveand he earned own money alone and also Hillary Clinton is same kind of people like Barrack Obama but I really dont like that kind of people so I will not never suggest Hillary Clinton only Donald Trump.Donald Trump is best and Vladimir Putin also 
She isn't trustworthy, she straight up lies to her supporters and changes her stance which is usually negative initially to comfort the masses, its hard to trust her when she has a hard time getting a lot of things right until people correct her.
Plus the fact her campaign is 20% funded by Saudi Arabia and other nations including arms corporations, her being a warmonger and risking nuclear wars had she been elected would've probably been the end of a lot of people.
Russia is an aggressor country and if she feels slack attack. Hillary hard, and Russia is afraid of her. In this case, the war would not be accurate. As you said cowardice. Plus the fact her campaign is 20% funded by Saudi Arabia and other nations including arms corporations, her being a warmonger and risking nuclear wars had she been elected would've probably been the end of a lot of people.
She isn't trustworthy, she straight up lies to her supporters and changes her stance which is usually negative initially to comfort the masses, its hard to trust her when she has a hard time getting a lot of things right until people correct her.
Plus the fact her campaign is 20% funded by Saudi Arabia and other nations including arms corporations, her being a warmonger and risking nuclear wars had she been elected would've probably been the end of a lot of people.
Plus the fact her campaign is 20% funded by Saudi Arabia and other nations including arms corporations, her being a warmonger and risking nuclear wars had she been elected would've probably been the end of a lot of people.
Literally speaking NO, because I haven't yet meet her.Besides I'm not into her because her mouth is full of fallacy and she's a woman with no work but to distract the lives of people on her co-people in USA.Trustworthy doesn't fit and exist to her because I feel a bit that she is greedy and ingratefull of everything. so therefore, Hillary Clinton is indeed not trustworthy.
A few hours back, I happened to listen to a speech made by a radical feminist in CNN. She was hoping that Chelsea Clinton would become the first female president of the United States. What sort of rubbish is this? Why do we need anyone from the Clinton crime family in powerful positions again?
Back around the time of the 'moral majority' attacks on the Clintons I myself thought that would be kind of cool to have the Clintons continue to rub their faces in the dirt. It was a result of a variety of things (youthful ignorance, lack of internet, etc) but mostly it was a rejection to people who I thought were scum (like David Brock who, ironically enough, switched sides to became the standard bearer for the Clintonista wing of the Democrats.)
I watched Clinton's performance as senator and by the end of that time I nearly spit on the floor at the mention of her name. What had happened mostly, I think, was the internet. People could make arguments and back them up with hyperlinks, and I could further explore on my own. Also the Clintons actually really are a crime family so as time passes evidence of their criminal activities continues to build. Now we have a giant puss-filled abscess in the Clinton Foundation. Time to lance the thing, and I recommend that everyone put on eye protection and stand well back.
A few hours back, I happened to listen to a speech made by a radical feminist in CNN. She was hoping that Chelsea Clinton would become the first female president of the United States. What sort of rubbish is this? Why do we need anyone from the Clinton crime family in powerful positions again?
Back in 2008 I was much more of a 'progressive' than I am now. Although I did mark his name, I was not voting for Obama (who I knew nothing about) but rather voting against Clinton. Obama has been a loathsome disaster, but for all his faults he has not tried to do Iran. Yet. I did not trust the either McCain or Clinton would not have done the same. McCain because he is a blatant war-monger, and Clinton because she'll do anything the Zionist tell her to as far as I can tell. I wrote someone for 2012, but in retrospect I do wish that Romney had won for a variety of reasons.
Here's another amusing vid about 'Ready for Hillary.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYJ-yfnj-OE
Her reaction about Gaddafi shows me more than anything that she is not a normal human being and not someone we want making decisions about our lives.
Her looks can be deceiving! on a glance at her of course you will trust her because of her images of being a mother, we will think that she can be a good mother of her country. but on the other hand, lets go back to the time of her administration as a first lady. well, we never know the real persona in every politician!
Back in 2008 I was much more of a 'progressive' than I am now. Although I did mark his name, I was not voting for Obama (who I knew nothing about) but rather voting against Clinton. Obama has been a loathsome disaster, but for all his faults he has not tried to do Iran. Yet. I did not trust the either McCain or Clinton would not have done the same. McCain because he is a blatant war-monger, and Clinton because she'll do anything the Zionist tell her to as far as I can tell. I wrote someone for 2012, but in retrospect I do wish that Romney had won for a variety of reasons.
Here's another amusing vid about 'Ready for Hillary.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYJ-yfnj-OE
Her reaction about Gaddafi shows me more than anything that she is not a normal human being and not someone we want making decisions about our lives.
Amazing, isn't it?
On the Real News front, Trump has announced he'll immediately stop supporting rebels in Syria.
He's just stopped a major war.
On the Real News front, Trump has announced he'll immediately stop supporting rebels in Syria.
He's just stopped a major war.
Anyone will be better than Hillary. She was almost certain to start military confrontations with Russia and Iran. I hope that Trump will pursue a less interventionist foreign policy.
So I guess murrica agrees with us. Hitlery Cunton isn't trustworthy.
PS: All you brown and black people have one week to leave before whitie rounds you up and lights up the gas chambers. ROFL
PS: All you brown and black people have one week to leave before whitie rounds you up and lights up the gas chambers. ROFL
Yeah... 88% of the blacks voted for the most rabid warmonger in the world, and mainstream media thinks that it is quite normal. On the other hand, after 65% of the blue collar white males voted for Trump, the liberal journalists are demonizing the group by calling them xenophobes and racists. The MSM has lost all its credibility.
Yep, it's illogical and insane. In this case, the electoral college did exactly what it was designed to do (save the ignorant masses from their own destruction).
Wouldn't it be funny if Trump ended up being a great president and peace maker going on to win a second term in office? LOL
Franklin D. Roosevelt was considered to be too weak and sick to be president. Always sickly and weak, he was the fifth cousin to his wife Eleanor. He was a skirt chaser having multiple extramarital affairs. One affair with Lucy Mercer Rutherfurd lasted almost as long as his marriage. He also had a 20-year affair with his private secretary Marguerite "Missy" LeHand and while president it was believed he had a sexual relationship with Princess Märtha of Sweden whom his son used to call "daddy's girlfriend". He was rumored to be a horrible racist believing emancipation of slaves was a mistake, which at that time was no big deal. He was elected to an unpresidented four terms as president eventually dying in office. He is responsible for taking America out of the Great Depression and winning WWII. Many people would argue that he was the greatest president that will ever be elected to office.
He was also a horrible person, a horrible husband and a racist misogynistic megalomaniac.
Trump could end up being a great president.
So I guess murrica agrees with us. Hitlery Cunton isn't trustworthy.
PS: All you brown and black people have one week to leave before whitie rounds you up and lights up the gas chambers. ROFL
PS: All you brown and black people have one week to leave before whitie rounds you up and lights up the gas chambers. ROFL
Yeah... 88% of the blacks voted for the most rabid warmonger in the world, and mainstream media thinks that it is quite normal. On the other hand, after 65% of the blue collar white males voted for Trump, the liberal journalists are demonizing the group by calling them xenophobes and racists. The MSM has lost all its credibility.
Amazing, isn't it?
On the Real News front, Trump has announced he'll immediately stop supporting rebels in Syria.
He's just stopped a major war.
Now they are signing petitions to get Hillary elected... I try to understand the math of these idiots. They voted for Hillary, everyone knows that... they wanted their vote to count more...so they think their name on a petition will be more valuable than their vote in a voting booth. Interesting.
And I didn't vote for both, but Trump won, they need to deal with it.
And I didn't vote for both, but Trump won, they need to deal with it.
So I guess murrica agrees with us. Hitlery Cunton isn't trustworthy.
PS: All you brown and black people have one week to leave before whitie rounds you up and lights up the gas chambers. ROFL
PS: All you brown and black people have one week to leave before whitie rounds you up and lights up the gas chambers. ROFL
Yeah... 88% of the blacks voted for the most rabid warmonger in the world, and mainstream media thinks that it is quite normal. On the other hand, after 65% of the blue collar white males voted for Trump, the liberal journalists are demonizing the group by calling them xenophobes and racists. The MSM has lost all its credibility.
Politician should not be taken serious about theirs campaign promise s,they will tell people about good manifesto. And when elected they will do like wise
still unprocessed? Ahhh i forget it's public america... I only know corporate America... she would be in jail or in the hudson if she did that inside a competitive org...
Remember the Benghazi attack? Clinton and others overrode the order to send a rescue team because they mistakenly thought the attack was over. The report, as NBC News highlights, also cites several witnesses who explained that the administration failed to act in time in part because they incorrectly thought the attack was over and that it would thus be more prudent to send reinforcements to Tripoli. Remember the 4 americans who died in Libya. Never forget Clinton's carelessness.
Of course Hillary isn't trustworthy. She lost, didn't she?
Jump to: