I wasn't talking about limit in tokenomics, but i could make a ton of arguments on the subject of bitcoin being historically strong and this could need a whole another topic and i am not the one having enough inside to write about it.
OK, now I understand what you mean.
and maybe this isn't a topic you specifically address for Bitcoin, but I think this topic is quite interesting.
I could talk about psychological side of markets, PoW biased propaganda for and against of PoW, AML laws etc, but i might do topic for that later. I would need to consult actual experts when even scratching the tech side of it.
So I have to wait patiently for the next discussion, even though I want to convey the other side of market psychology and PoW propaganda.
What I know is that PoW has existed long before bitcoin, this concept was re-applied by Satoshi to prevent counterfeiting of the use of assets, because this is considered very important to protect, for example spending the same asset more than once.
Let's just say that BTC is not out of the woods yet and there are ton of pitfalls that could stop the road to the moon. The argument of pure decentralization as defence is fascinating, but somehow overly mystified imho.
Although gladly assume that. However, my instincts still say no. Because BTC is the path to the community that I have built until now, even though they are not directly involved and know exactly what BTC is?
Confusion is anonymous, it's not actually formed but we know it.