I see poverty as the inability to provide what you need. So when people assume that poverty is when you don't have money I don't agree. Now what if you have all you need and you don't require money to buy anything, are you poor? Some people live in communities where everyone lives agrarian life. They have all they need because everything they need to survive is available. Food is on the farm, water available and everybody is happy. Although it was hard during the Covid-19 lockdown many people lived without money. I have also seen many people leaving cities and moving to rural areas to live a natural life.
In summary when you have everything you need to survive and you don't need money, are you poor?
There is some truth to what you say, but still there are other facts that you need to consider. Poverty doesn't always come from lack of money. If there is lack of services, resources, good quality of life, no food, no education, no roof, then yes, even though you have money, you are still living under poverty even though you have money. But the way you wrote, it sounded that money isn't needed as long as we have "everything". Even in agriculture based societies, money still plays a role. Think about the infrastructure that supports the community - clean water systems, electricity to power homes, medical services, transportation, and so on. These things generally require funding to establish and maintain. So, someone must have the "money" to buy those, and provide to the community, no? Even if individuals aren't directly handling money, somewhere along the line, there's a monetary transaction. That might be at a government level, a non-profit, or another organization supporting the infrastructure. So yeah, without "money", you can't actually survive.