Topic: Is regulation good or bad? - page 22. (Read 30867 times)
I anticipate this is a rule that the admin has considering of ripening... they assume 't needfully create adjustment without a content... their ground zero is to create this assembly greater, adroit from email upright. confidently we desire explain that
I furthermore anticipate that a rule is essential, I just ambition it desire be finished with the counsel of the specialist. Instead each is loss to get complex.
The conception ass BTC is to be decentralised and no administration buoy affect it`s supplying, on the other hand without someregulations we get a mass on crypto marketplace largely on the ICO marketplace. So, adjustment are essential to adroit up the juke and bunco ICOs.
Of line, rule is not the better pick. the sport of cryptography is spread. we assume 't require a administration to cope with cryptography. Cryptography is ripening. those buncos desire be circumscribed close to the marketplace
I anticipate rule desire be great representing forthcoming of crypto, later this rule scammers desire intersect and investment in crypto desire be many safety. On the other hand not everybody desire similar this rule and i anticipate ico desire intersect later we has affix rule.
I think the only advantage to the regulator is that they will clear the market a bit of scam coins and scammers. I really hope so.
The greater population of the world outside there are waiting for crypto to be regulated. A lot of investors out there are waiting to invest in crypto only if this amazing industry is regulated. Nobody wish to be scammed at the long round and depend on somebody to survive so everybody is careful and cautious when it it comes to money. In my very opinion, regulation is good and it will bring a lot of investors and traders into the crypto world. With it, crypto will reach the mass adoption it has been waiting for.
Regulators can take different forms, they can have different consequences, because nobody knows what the regulators will look like in the future, but I think they will be good
and you are a very difficult question because no one knows how things will be with the regulators in the world of cryptocurrency. I believe that they definitely will not interfere when the cryptocurrency is still being introduced into our economy.
I am sure that regulation is very good for cryptocurrency. You stop being a victim of fraudsters. This will give you the opportunity to earn more than without regulators.
Without regulation nothing will gone properly but if it was over regulated also then some problems will be created so how it can be regulated is the matter of success and we can decide it will be bad or good while seeing how it can be regulated.
cryptocurrency has a secret, independent and has high security, so in my opinion the regulation will result in the basic principle of crypto being lost, especially if there is a state monopoly on a token so that it will cause the token value to be lost this, so in my opinion regulation is not needed to date.
No one wish or hope to invest in a scam project, nobody wishes to lose a penny to any project or website. Crypto has still not reach mass adoption because of lack of regulations, many investors out there are cautious anf never wish to invest in crypto because they could be scammed anytime. For crypto to reach mass adoption which is good, crypto must be regulated.
regulation will have a positive effect on the development of cryptography in general. This does not mean that you have to advertise your income, which means that you will be more protected
In my view, regulation will be good for Crypto industry. As we can now see that many Govt are looking for ways to regulate the industry.
Regulation will be a good thing in the long run. It will build trust for the industry among the masses thereby resulting in mass adoption. With regulation, people will feel more comfortable and have a sense of security to invest in crypto.
I don't believe that regulation means we have to declare our portfolio. Just as nobody cares to know exactly how much you own in the bank.
Regulation will also help in curbing the possibility of using crypto to launder money and place a check and balance in ICO which will make it very difficult for scam ICOs to operate.
I say regulation will in the end be a good thing for crypto..
What's your view about it?
Regulation will be a good thing in the long run. It will build trust for the industry among the masses thereby resulting in mass adoption. With regulation, people will feel more comfortable and have a sense of security to invest in crypto.
I don't believe that regulation means we have to declare our portfolio. Just as nobody cares to know exactly how much you own in the bank.
Regulation will also help in curbing the possibility of using crypto to launder money and place a check and balance in ICO which will make it very difficult for scam ICOs to operate.
I say regulation will in the end be a good thing for crypto..
What's your view about it?
It's changeable for some situation you can't choose one way in trading if you choose you can't be in for long time.
I can't stand regulation, that's why I am in crypto currency and it is really something opposite to traditional bank system and regulation. Don't ruin this crypto paradise!
Many people are still wondering why crypto has still not reach mass adoption. The answer to this question is clearly stated which is, "regulation" . A lot of investors out there are looking for ways to invest their source of income but are still afraid of losing huge sum of monies. For crypto to reach mass adoption, there should be regulations and I think this is good.
of course it's good. and it will be good not only for large investors, but also for ordinary people who will trust more to cryptocurrency
Close to control the crypto business, the crypto currentness desire miss its substance. This buoy come about slowly. What desire we move as a effect? Contained centralised utilization, utility exploitation blockchain?
Cryptocurrency rule is never potential. Humans are aloof symptom their age thought almost control cryptocurrency. They should aloof admit and study to adjust to the apply of cryptocurrencies.
Many people are still wondering why crypto has still not reach mass adoption. The answer to this question is clearly stated which is, "regulation" . A lot of investors out there are looking for ways to invest their source of income but are still afraid of losing huge sum of monies. For crypto to reach mass adoption, there should be regulations and I think this is good.
Jump to: