Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 52. (Read 5484 times)
Hello! Pavel Durov is awesome! I'd like to take a part in his ICO but I am sure that will over very fast with hard cap! Interesting thing he will make any bounty campaign? Very interesting fact is that 90% Russian people don't know about it and don't use it because they have Viber and Skype. Actually I tried to propose Telegram to my friends they have no any idea what is this and why they need install this! I think this is necessary making amazing huge PR!
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Not really. Even a telegram channel with 30.000 member can be the result of a scam ICO. With some good tricks you can easily fool a lot of people.
Undoubtedly Telegram will be most successful ICO ever started before.
Economists even dispute what will be better for Telegram ICO or classic IPO on stockmarket . On what market Telegram will collect funds more.
Economists even dispute what will be better for Telegram ICO or classic IPO on stockmarket . On what market Telegram will collect funds more.
I do not think so, some can have big number due to bounty campaign! Not the true value of the ICO. Do you research!
Yes, using telegram to communicate with the project team is very convenient. Almost all projects use the telegram without fail and this is correct. This greatly simplifies everything.
the community activity is an important factor to be a successful ico, and telegram is one of the community, slack and twitter are also important to judge the community, cause some projects dont build a telegram group
Yes, you are right for that, the more who join the telegram campaign the better, because I think the ico project telegram program more and more visible to Bitcoin users and ico it will be successful in the future.
Messenger telegrams have become one of the most popular applications for people involved in crypto currency. This application has only twitter in the competition. In my opinion, with the advent of the telegram application, it is much more convenient to work on the crypto-currency market. The upcoming ICO telegram will probably become one of the most successful.
it's not the standard, just a company who is popular and anything they will produce will be somewhat popular or very popular
the community activity is an important factor to be a successful ico, and telegram is one of the community, slack and twitter are also important to judge the community, cause some projects dont build a telegram group
its depend how active dev are answering all investors question. it also depend how active is the group. the team project also must be very active to give a new info about their project in telegram and to make sure telegram didnt died just like that. this also giving the good look to the investors of how serious are their with their project up.
Or they could be busier focusing on actual development.
That's why I don't really think an active Telegram is a good measure of ICO success. Don't get me wrong, it's really helpful and says a lot about the company but still, a working product, for example, would be a better indicator.
its depend how active dev are answering all investors question. it also depend how active is the group. the team project also must be very active to give a new info about their project in telegram and to make sure telegram didnt died just like that. this also giving the good look to the investors of how serious are their with their project up.
Yes it is a good platgorm to measure the success of an ICO. with ttelegram you can get an update to what is happening to the ICO by communicating with other people who also joined the ICO. Plus it can reach many investors that can make the ICO succeed.
Not totally but Yes it is one of the great tool to measure of ICO success becuase telaegram is one of the best engine in social media to huge the target people and a lot of interested people or investors looking on it and joining telegram to get daily updated informaton in regards with the project.
The number of members working on the Telegram of a project is an important criterion for evaluating the community and their interest in the project. I usually trust more with projects that have a membership of over 5k and are active. Communities are good at deciding the success of each project, so having a large community on Telegram will make the project easy to succeed.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I totally agree with you, I judge an upcoming ICO/project by looking at their social media presence too and if their telegram channel is very active they got a better chance in going big.
No matter how good a product is, if nobody knows it exist it will never catch on in my opinion.
No, but it can be one one of the tool measure to make their ico success, because there are lot of social bounty campaign to make the ico become successful in the end. But most of the time telegram was also one of getting information update about the project if the ico is in good progress.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I totally agree with you, I judge an upcoming ICO/project by looking at their social media presence too and if their telegram channel is very active they got a better chance in going big.
No matter how good a product is, if nobody knows it exist it will never catch on in my opinion.
Polymath's telegram groups are some of my favorite groups just because of how active they are on there. Gives me a lot of confidence about them.
no, telegram is just a referecnce method for us to measure an ICO, there are many ways to measure an ICO but telegram would be the easiest to see how big the community and what the community talk about ICOs, so don't just take informations from only Telegram, we must take informations from many sources.
Most investors always evaluate from the telegram as this is the information channel about the project. If the project has a large number of members, then surely this project is a lot of people are interested and can help us have a good view of the project.
The number of telegram followers is not the best measure for evaluating a project.
Jump to: