Most telegram groups are useless, people asking the same questions not even bothered to look at the pinned message. Most common question is When moon? Is it moon? C'mon "coin_name" do something, When lambo? and stickers with Pepe the frog. Sometimes posting dancing people when slight price increase.
The only one I stay beside bounty and airdrop ones is Nexus coin group. Very mature community and people are helpful. Unfortunately, main support is on Slack, which I hate for vulnerability to spam. Telegram is a great platform, but most groups are toxic and immature.
Topic: Is Telegram the new measure of ICO success? - page 48. (Read 5484 times)
I think its a factor for the ICO success because you have many followers who is interested in your project/ICO. This is the way were the investors and supporters can interact with the developer and this is also the way to know fresh news about what is happening in your ICO.
Telegram also provides very handy bot services, which allow to automate registration, verification and other actions for ICO participants.
This really helps to manage ICO process.
This really helps to manage ICO process.
In my opinion, Telegram is just one more tool and platform for the promotion and advertising. It doesn't give me more trust or reliability in the project. I see it as good PR and social media strategy, but not a guarantee of a project success.
I do not think the telegram is a tool to help the ICO project succeed. Telegram is an anonymous indirect exchange tool and the group manager of the project will have to answer all the questions of the group members.Spam components will be kicked out of the group. So there will be no advertisement here.
I think facebook and twitter are two social networking sites promoting the best ICO projects. I have found some very great projects promoted on facebook.
Now Telegram must always be active so investors can ask and wait for important announcements. In this case the project must always respond to all investors' fears to make their ICO a big success.
In my opinion, Telegram is just one more tool and platform for the promotion and advertising. It doesn't give me more trust or reliability in the project. I see it as good PR and social media strategy, but not a guarantee of a project success.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
In my own opinion, telegram is one of the reason why there are a lot of ico's that is being successful today and the value of their payouts as well is also a decent amount after the sale so sometimes i prefer to join campaign with telegram because most of the investors are focusing on a legit ico.
I don't think so because most telegram ICO brings people into their telegram channel using airdrop to bring them in. they are not there for the seek of the project but to get airdrop. So you see telegram I dont think it should be used to measure ICO success
I don't see Telegram as the new solution for the community become in most of cases trolls will appear , chaos will start and from there is gonna be a mess. It's very essential to have stricted rulles on telegram so in this way you can have a nice and unite community. I think this is a rule that most of the ICO's and projects should have it implemented.
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
Telegram is one of the way to remove duplicate accounts in the ico and most of the participants are choosing to join a campaign that has a telegram involved because it has a higher rate of success more than other campaign.
Yes, i think it is one of the criteria for measuring successful ICOs. By observation, majority of successful ICOs most time had huge number of participants or community. Even the ICO project teams have discovered this and that is why try as much as possible to boost their communities.
The thing I like about telegram is the live chatting no matter how many people in the group. It was set simple and easy to understand the command. It is simply interaction using message and images. For me, that is why more people is into telegram but to answer the question, telegram is one of the medium for the success of an ICO. Is it be new or not, as long as telegram wont prohibit ads it will be a good social media and promoting products and services.
With about 100 million active users Telegram is definitely top social space to advertise ICOs.
Really big ICO communities, like Envion for example, reached 40K people in Telegram.
It's extremely important for any ICO to create and manage it's own Announcements and Chat channels.
Really big ICO communities, like Envion for example, reached 40K people in Telegram.
It's extremely important for any ICO to create and manage it's own Announcements and Chat channels.
Bounty campaings of every project say that to join their telegram is a must due to this trende. The most success projects do an airdrop first to get as much telegram members as possible before token sale start. So yes, today telegram group is absoulte mesure of success 
I think telegram can't measure of ICO success. I think many people who invest in ICO is one of measure to know that the ICO success 
Been seeing projects' Telegram groups blow up and I think that's an attribute of success. Personally, when I find a project, I do judge them by their social media presence. How active a telegram channel does say a lot with their demand.
With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I think they use telegram to reach their investor and all supporters and I think its good because in telegram all the question and discussion you want to know about the project they answer in telegram. So I think telegram is the new measures of the successful of ICO or project. With the rise of groups exceeding Telegram's 50k member cap...what do you guys think?
Article: https://news.bitcoin.com/telegram-followers-the-new-metric-for-cryptocurrency-success/
I think so, because of the smartphone number you can really say that there are that many people around...
Telegram reached the most number of people when it comes to campaigns because it is easy to join and you will do nothing.
I think that is not the cause of success.
I think it is the social media that gives success to most bounties because it is their form of advertisement.
It is where they become popular.
I think that is not the cause of success.
I think it is the social media that gives success to most bounties because it is their form of advertisement.
It is where they become popular.
This is just another social media platform that can connect with investors and other merchants. One of the many criteria to consider for finding a good and successful ICO is knowing the power of its own social community as more and more members of the community become ICO's success.
Well Refereum has 100k users and was the main reason why Telegram had to up the group limits. So I guess the question is: Is Refereum the best ICO ever launched? Short answer..no.
Plus, many telegram groups build their user base from scam airdrops and contests and then change the name of the Group after, so numbers can be very deceiving. Just saying...
On the other hand, Polymath had capped at 50k users when that was the limit and they didn't even have an ICO and their launch was pretty epic so far if you base success off token price.
I'm not sure about all of telegram users are real humans. Sometimes the telegram can be manipulated to reach a lot of attention from the crypto users after seeing about a telegram group with a lot of people already joined in it. Plus, many telegram groups build their user base from scam airdrops and contests and then change the name of the Group after, so numbers can be very deceiving. Just saying...
On the other hand, Polymath had capped at 50k users when that was the limit and they didn't even have an ICO and their launch was pretty epic so far if you base success off token price.
I seem some icos that reached more than 50k users in the telegram too but i can take an example for that. Gonetwork is having so many people in telegram group but not all of them are a real person. This can't be a good measure to define how good ico itself.
Jump to: