Topic: Is this a Strategy? Is it a good Strategy? - page 5. (Read 601 times)

Well, in my country, people would say that "in every industry or organisation, there are a lot of unethical things going on." Some times you cannot really tell if it's just some planned troubles for their gains or not, but I still don't believe that all those fights and issues are real; some of them are just orchestrated so they can gain more attention. They could also just pay some bloggers to also publicise some fake content with edited pictures or video. In my opinion, as long as those acts don't harm any individual directly or indirectly, then it's good, but anything that harms or inflicts pain on another is bad strategy; it's only for a selfish interest.


Cheers 🥂, Dr.Bitcoin_Strange 👺👺

In the last year, we have seen a lot of celebrities who have come out on social media to call out their other celebrities and with this eventually, some are proven to be true while others are just to pull a crowd and make people notice them on their page. This year for instance there is a celeb who got married to another wife and has been creating a scene with that though personally I haven't been interested in knowing more

These billionaires and celebrities have inflated egos they always want to be in the lead and they want to be praised in all their works and if someone takes that attention from they are threatened and want to challenge that guy this is what exactly happens to the rumor of Mark Zuckerberg - Elon Musk fist fight, of course, this is good to generate attention for their respective business even though there is no need to do this because they will end up both looks like kids who want attention.

Whether intentionally or orchestrated they are gaining attention but it looks like based on their history against each other, they really hate each other and they want a venue to release that hate.

Not entirely. There could be some benefit if possible but I do believe just like many said already that these are just people who do not have too many people who challenge their ego and that's the only reason. When you are Elon Musk, you have lower level people who criticize you and you have workers who will do what you ask or you fire them so you basically have power over everyone, so when another alpha dog like Mark comes along and risks bruising your ego, you end up locking horns. This is of course nothing, they ain't fighting and won't ever fight and all of this is for just show, there is no way they would, they just want to "look tough" but they will not be fighting, that's not going to happen for sure.

Such news keep the public in expectation and it generate attention which is a marketing strategy on its own. In marketing, you need to get the audience or attention of whoever you are trying to convince and in this case, it worked very well that the public are so eager to see that happen and so they kept talking about them, checking up on their social media handles which automatically increase the numbers of views, likes and also followership. Followership is important for them so whether the news created positive or negative atmosphere for them, it surely had a positive influence on their status.

I don't think it was intentional but since these guys are people that are into attention business, they won't want a good opportunity like this to go to waste, remember that both good and bad press are good for business and they will get free publicity for these because a lot of media will want to cover this. Even the fight might be shown on both Twitter and Facebook if they include it in their agreement

The celebrities doesn’t involve in the fight on the talk related to any arguments The celebrities may interfere in the crypto project after their investments in that project.People with more knowledge will do research and inverse in the crypto project.The beginners of the cryptocurrency community will take a risk and do random investment which is not the essential one.The strategies towards the game is essential one.It also includes the trading and investment in the cryptocurrency as like the real stock market investment.

This is kind of a culture in the entertainment industry, entertainers stage disagreements and fights amongst themselves all the time in order to promote a new song, movie or just to maintain relevance. I don’t pay attention to celebrity beef, it’s all acting to me.

The Elon vs Zuckerberg fight is crazy and is classic example of how much impact these celebrities have, I don’t think there was any seriousness to it at first. Elon is not a trained fighter, if the match holds, it will be the most lousy match of the century.

I knew a couple of such guys. I won't use names, but in the country that I was born, there was a boxer who was bad, so he turned into kickboxing, then MMA and he never did good, kept losing, but people still kept watching his fights because he loved to create drama. He wouldn't shake hands, wouldn't congratulate the winner, would fight dirty in and outside the ring.
People hated him and wanted to see him lose, and that's how he kept making money for years.

IMO this is a good strategy if you are mentally tough and can take the backlash.

Influencers do it daily so I guess it's working. These influencers are banking on attention and they'd do everything to be on the spotlight. Billionaires creating issues to be the talk of the town isn't really anything different, although they already have proven means of making money so there's that. Perhaps, the reason why rich guys do this is because they just don't have anything better to do with their lives. If they wanted attention, they can create news that will not require them to engage in such activities but hey, maybe they really just get bored and wants to fight it out physically?

It's also called business, sometimes they need to create a sensation, sometimes don't. What is clear is that they have a certain way of attracting public attention and this assumption can be considered as a strategic element of their business or career strategy. I think that is relative, and people's views certainly differ depending on what side is seen and is the object of attention. I think it's a classic style and not a professional typr in building a business.

I do not know if this topic going to remain on this thread or will go into an off-topic thread so I would cover my answer as shortly as possible. Which is, yes and no. Sometimes they do that on purpose because they want to shift all eyes on them and want to be in the spotlight. For example, many say when Elon Musk was presenting his new truck (cyber truck I think) and he said the glass is break-proof and when he hit it, the glass broked which many said he did that on purpose because his rivals will spread that news like fire and that's a free publicity shared by those who do not like that idea.

Is it not funny, they play back games on their rivals and haters and lure them into doing actions that become profitable for celebrities and companies? Like the current scenario of a Titanic submarine going into waters for a tour of The Titanic ship's Wreckage and many still saying they did that on purpose *I am nobody here to judge because the loss is real*

And yes it is obviously a good strategy. did you not watch any celebrity video which is full of cringe and hatred for some groups of people to attract their attention so that those people could spread the word even if it is hatred one and spreading their information is all they want and we are doing it intentionally.

It depends on the people involved, a billionaire that makes his money not on social media nor those he need  his image as influence, if such person ever have a public fight is either it's real or he is planning on using the publicity as his new strategy.

I am familiar with celebrities, influencers using this strategy to actually remain relevant in the their craft, does it work? Yes this strategy works very well especially when a musician is about to release a song or album, they use some of this strategy to gain audience.

Your last sentence would have been used in the subject as well. Like if I may restructure the sentence, it will be "If this a Strategy, Is it a good Strategy?". Yes it is a fight to attract fans for fame. If I could remember, in those days for about 20 years back, celebrates (musicians) were shooting themselves to overtake the next person position in the music field. They were envy for one another progress. They are fighting for best name and also to tarnish the other person name/image. Most of them are also fake, the fake ones are always coming from oil companies, they fighit to distract the oil producing communities so they can extract the oil freely when the fight is going on. It is also a tactics oil companies used.

You know what they say “there is no such thing as bad publicity” and while such a fight seems like nothing but a PR stunt, people are still interested on it, after all who does not want to see some billionaires fighting each other? In a way this reminds me of the Trump vs McMahon fight in which they both picked a wrestler to fight as their representatives, if Elon and Zuckerberg actually fought each other then this will be many times larger than that fight.

A publicity stunt is not always the case; some fights are genuine. Many celebrities engage in such behavior to gain the limelight. Sometimes, companies do choose to adopt a negative marketing strategy to gain more audience attention.

If you may wish to know, staying in limelight is what everyone would desire because it keeps you at the top notch of the society and helm of affairs. Many of these bruhaha in the society I believe are just to gain prominence and remain notices in the society. It is most common amongst artist and they are all at it being at the mainstream media for just nothing reasonable. Companies do this as well just to attract the attention of the masses to their product and gain cheap publicity. All these are for business and profit making.
So OP, most of all these rantings with celebrities and companies are just a good business strategy.

Controversy, Seems to be a good allegation against public figures or struggling actors or content creators for the companies in the market also this strategy seems true to conquer the opponent and increase the attraction towards themself. For the billionaires or elite class I don't think so they really need the public attraction.

Well, it is clear from the outcomes after the controversies that they usually create themself for personal gains.

Sometimes we may hear the conflicts between the two well-known parties and this may bring them to the news. We never know if this is being done to gain popularity or if it is just natural. Even we hear some known personality will tweet about the bitcoin price prediction and gain hype. Though their prediction never comes true, yet people listen to them and they are talked about all over the internet.

Sometimes these personalities will publish good or bad news about crypto creating a pump or dump in the market. Elon Musk is a perfect example of this as how he changed his profile photo and/or title to Bitcoin and removed it causing the market to move. These celebrities want to be in the news and they would do all the dirty things to be part of the news. I would not call it a "Good Strategy "

I get the idea that this is because of Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk's potential fight.

If it's mostly hyped on social media, I don't believe that it's a real fight. A beef is just a beef and its purpose is for clout chasing. This is very common these days so, don't believe with anything you see on social media even if gets reported by the media. But you also get to understand if it's an actual thing.

Yes and yes. Negative or positive publicity is still publicity for them. It's just all about of being talked about in the whole town world.