Turns out in war the most difficult exercise is to guess what the enemy will do next or what is it up to.
What's US idea about supporting ISIS? Could be many things... or just a bunch of retards who jumped of the handle.
What's US idea about supporting ISIS? Could be many things... or just a bunch of retards who jumped of the handle.
This is nonsense. Many times, a country might support insurgents who turn out to be different than what was perceived, or who morph into something different than what they originally were. This is nothing new.
To reverse reality and project the US helping the diabolical ISIS from the beginning is a stretch. I dislike Obama and think he is incompetant, but this is too much.
Unfortunately. It is not nonsense. Obama is a puppet. He has about as much power as a gnat when it come to the Military Industrial Complex and the Global Corporate Fascist Financial Dictatorship.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI
Evidence to back the claims made in video: http://scgnews.com/the-covert-origins-of-isis
You've taken a spin on events that suits your preconceptions, and stand on those grounds. But those are not the only interpretations of cause and effect.
100% true and verifiable. You are not salvageable. You are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. You are in love with your captors.
It's not that you don't have some facts that are "verifiable."
It's that in attempting to actually understand history, even the best efforts often err. But this is particularly pronounced when dealing with short time frames like 1-10 years.
The attributions of cause and effect are flawed. Describing events is relatively easy. Attributing cause and effect is something different.
Remember all the spin that "Katrina was caused by Bush?" (through some intricate chain of logic relating to Bush being Anti-Kyoto or such).
)
