Topic: Islamic law is adopted by British legal chiefs - page 5. (Read 4383 times)

I am not. It is a short thread. You'll see who would want that change by scrolling back... up.

Even though I do not agree with it I kinda maybe sightly relatively understand the logic behind it, men, versus women in transfer of money (did I say i don't really get it but...) presented by you.

The part I truly don't understand is why this belief regarding the transfer of belongings also is the law regarding being a witness? I could be wrong but in SOME (maybe not all) islamist countries, the testimony of a woman is half as valid as the testimony of a men, when both were witness of the same case (crime, hit and run, etc, etc). I could be wrong and that could simply be an internet urban legend of course... Hopefully you will educate me on that subject.

That is another thing about bitcoin not being halal compliant, nor christian laws compliant, nor kosher compliant. Because we want bitcoin to be truly universal everyone can do what they please with their belief system, but some so called professional anarchist on this thread would love of having this NOT to be the case 

She is no half of human being.But in Islamic Society it is responsibility of male to look after all his family financial needs.Females just have to look after children.So man inherit double that of a woman.

Seriously, does your head even parse what you write before you hit "post"? Or do you honestly believe that's what I wrote?

Maybe the descendants of my Scot ancestors are smart people, eh, what?

My $.02.

The British politicians think otherwise. And they have a solid reason too. Islam is the fastest growing religion in England. And it is considered to be one of the factors behind the possible secession of Scotland.

Has no one figured out that all religions are bad?

My $.02.

Being a Muslim is not "belonging to a race". Don't you know that? My Muslim brother can have blue eyes, dark skin, red hair, fair skin, just like my Christian brother or my Buddhist brother. How can I be a racist in that case?

If I see Catholics and Protestants killing each other, going to war with each other, bombing each other, saying what I witness is madness and insane would define me as a racist and a "christianophobe"?

Can a sharia law bitcoin compliant be pro gay marriage? I believe marriage is between a man and a woman. The great thing about bitcoin is I cannot stop somebody else to use his bitcoins to fight me and my belief. What would happen if bitcoin was to become sharia law compliant? Would you change the code to block wallets that support causes that would not be compatible with your belief system? How can you be a "professional anarchist" and believe bitcoin needs to be sharia compliant at the same time? It is incompatible and everyone reading this thread understands this. I want to understand. You are of course free to call me all the names in the world if you cannot explains that obvious paradox.

So far you've used the islamophobic strawman, the racist strawman... What else are you going to use against me? I can share my amazon stock with you if necessary as I get them wholesale

So...I'm guessing you get them wholesale then.

If you're happy with racism, if you're happy being an Islamophobe, nothing I can say will change that. I was just pointing out that if it's perfectly acceptable to write "legal chiefs adopt Islamic law" when some existing law happens to be compatible with Shariah, then it is just as acceptable (or in my mind, stupid) to say "Satoshi adopts Islamic law" when Bitcoin also happens to be compatible with Shariah.

Not answering a muppet's question about how it would be important for a "Professional Anarchist" like yourself to fight for the right of bitcoin to be sharia's compliant is not in itself proof of being an Amazon Prime super user?

Anarchism
[...]
Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be immoral, or alternatively as opposing authority in the conduct of human relations. Proponents of anarchism (known as "anarchists") advocate stateless societies based on what sometimes is defined like non-hierarchical organizations, and in another times is defined like voluntary associations.

Sharia
[...]
Sharia deals with many topics addressed by secular law, including crime, politics, and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting. Though interpretations of sharia vary between cultures, in its strictest and most historically coherent definition it is considered the infallible law of God—as opposed to the human interpretation of the laws (fiqh).However, historically, much of Sharia has been implemented in its strictest understanding.

Bitcoin
[...]
The bitcoin system is not controlled by a single entity, like a central bank, which has led the US Treasury to call bitcoin a decentralized currency


Why would anyone, muppet or otherwise care what bitcoin should be sharia law compliant or not? Is Allah Satoshi Nakamoto?
In a decentralized system, where should I point my prayer rug toward? Can a bitcoin wallet become infidel? 

I liked that amazon strawman joke. DJ PHATWA was in da House! 

MIT License. Attribution required.

LOL nearly squirted. I'm going to use that.

Do you get your straw men off Amazon? Or do you buy wholesale?

Anyone who would post an anti-Islamic article from the Torygraph which replaces "guidance issued on using existing legislation to cater for British Muslims" with "Islamic law is adopted by British legal chiefs", punctuating it with a photo of a blood soaked Michael Adebolajo and the text "UK's Capitulation?" is most definitely, a muppet. And that's being slightly disrespectful to muppets.
 

So anyone who would not believe in what you believe exactly, in that case a religion giving its blessing to a bunch of codes... is an idiotic muppet?
Wouldn't that type mindset be making a lot of Bitcoin and Anarchists idiotic muppets too? 

http://dailyanarchist.com/2013/01/30/is-bitcoin-sharia-compliant/

It comes down to Islamic definitions of what money is. It turns out that Bitcoin is more aligned with Islamic notions of money than fiat.

Edit: Now you can post that "Satoshi adopts Islamic Law" and post scary videos. Muppet.

Of course I've seen it. Why else would I reference it, but why do you feel the need to apologise for the beliefs of morons. What does it have to do with you?

If I surveyed the population of mathematicians, I would find a disproportionately high number of people who were attracted to difficult intellectual problems.
If I surveyed the population of nurses, I would find a disproportionately high number of people who were attracted to caring for their fellow humans.
If I surveyed the population of garderners, I would find a disproportionately high number of people who wanted to work outside.
If I surveyed the population of people who trully believe bitcoin being sharia laws compliant, I would find a disproportionately high number of people who wanted to call the OP's post idiotic

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6336233

How can Math be Sharia Laws compliant, laws based on a religious belief?

+1 for muslamic ray guns

I feel the need to apologise to Muslims everywhere, on behalf of the British people, for the EDL.

I'm assuming you have seen the video? If not, search for Muslamic Ray Guns on YouTube.